Skip to main content
Log in

Tactile learning in resin foraging honeybees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Honeybees harvest and use plant resins in a mixture called propolis to seal cracks and smooth surfaces in the nest architecture. Resins in the nest may be important in maintaining a healthy colony due to their antimicrobial properties. This study had two main objectives: (1) Provide initial insight on the learning capabilities of resin foraging honeybees; (2) analyze the sensitivity of resin foraging honeybees to tactile stimuli to elucidate its possible role as a mechanism behind resin foraging. The first objective provides insight into the phenotype of these bees as compared to other forager types, while the second creates a starting point for further work on behavioral mechanisms of resin foraging. Using tactile proboscis extension response conditioning, we found that resin foragers learned to associate two different tactile stimuli, the presence of a gap between two plates and a rough sandpaper surface, with a sucrose reward significantly better than pollen foragers. The results of differential tactile conditioning exhibited no significant difference in the ability of resin foragers to discriminate between smooth and rough surfaces as compared to pollen foragers. We also determined that the sucrose response thresholds (SRTs) of returning resin foragers were lower compared to returning pollen foragers, but both resin foragers and pollen foragers learned a floral odor equally well. This is the first study to examine SRTs and conditioning to tactile and olfactory stimuli with resin foraging honeybees. The results provide new information and identify areas for future research on resin collectors, an understudied foraging phenotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bastos EMAF, Simone M, Jorge DM, Soares AES, Spivak M (2008) In vitro study of the antimicrobial activity of Brazilian and Minnesota, USA propolis against Paenibacillus larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 97:273–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollazzi M, Roces F (2007) To build or not to build: circulating dry air organizes collective building for climate control in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex ambiguus. Anim Behav 74:1349–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderone NW, Johnson BR (2002) The within-nest behaviour of honeybee pollen foragers in colonies with a high or low need for pollen. Anim Behav 63:749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane E (1990) Bees and beekeeping. Cornell Univ, Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • de Brito SG, Ortigão-Farias JR, Gauthier M, Liu F, Giurfa M (2007) Taste perception in honeybees: just a taste of honey? Arthropod-Plant Inte 1:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing HA (1992) Hole repair and the influence of learning on nest repair in the paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Insect Behav 5:459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing HA (1994) Information analysis by the paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus, during nest construction (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Insect Soc 41:361–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing HA, Jeanne RL (1990) The regulation of complex behaviour in the paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Anim Behav 39:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner-Levy T, Smith BH, Shafir S (2009) The effect of foraging specialization on various learning tasks in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erber J, Pribbenow B (2001) Antennal movements in the honeybee: How complex tasks are solved by a simple neuronal system. In: Cruse H et al (eds) Prerational intelligence: adaptive behavior and intelligent systems without symbols and logic, vol 1. Kluwer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber J, Kierzek S, Sander E, Grandy K (1998) Tactile learning in the honeybee. J Comp Physiol 228 A 183:737–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garedrew A, Lamprecht I, Schmolz E, Schricker B (2002) The varroacidal action of propolis: a laboratory assay. Apidologie 33:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode K, Huber Z, Mesce KA, Spivak M (2006) Hygienic behavior of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) is independent of sucrose responsiveness and foraging ontogeny. Horm Behav 49:391–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M (2007) Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well. J Comp Physiol A 193:801–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartz SM, Ben-Shahar Y, Tyler M (2001) Logistic growth curve analysis in associative learning data. Anim Cogn 4:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howse PE (1966) Air movement and termite behaviour. Nature 210:967–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2008) Global information sampling in the honeybee. Naturwissenschaften 95:523–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RJ (1980) Gallery construction by Nasutitermes costalis: polyethism and the behavior of individuals. Insect Soc 27:5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Lane MA (1985) Flower petal microtexture is a tactile cue for bees. Proc Nat Acad Sci 82:4750–4752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SH, Bardunias P, Yang RL (2008) Behavioral response of termites to tunnel surface irregularity. Behav Process 78:397–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterman R, Smith BH, Spivak M (2000) Brood odor discrimination abilities in hygienic honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) using proboscis extension reflex conditioning. J Insect Behav 13:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterman R, Ross R, Mesce K, Spivak M (2001) Olfactory and behavioral response thresholds to odors of diseased brood differ between hygienic and non-hygienic honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 187:441–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer W (1956) “Propolis bees” and their activities. Bee World 37:25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura J, Seeley TD (2006) The functional organization of resin work in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page RE Jr, Erber J (2001) Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor. Naturwissenschaften 89:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page RE Jr, Erber J, Fondrk MK (1998) The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 182:489–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T, Page RE Jr (1999) The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 185:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T, Waddington KD, Page Jr RE (2001) Modulation of sucrose response thresholds in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.): influence of genotype, feeding, and foraging experience

  • Roubik DW (1989) Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roussel E, Carcaud J, Sandoz JC, Giurfa M (2009) Reappraising social insect behavior through aversive responsiveness and learning. PLoS ONE 4:e4197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner R, Erber J, Page RE Jr (1999) Tactile learning and the individual evaluation of the reward in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 185:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner R, Page RE Jr, Erber J (2001) The effects of genotype, foraging role, and sucrose responsiveness on the tactile learning performance of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Neurobiol Learn Mem 76:138–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner R, Barnert M, Erber J (2003) Variation in water and sucrose responsiveness during the foraging season affects proboscis extension learning in honey bees. Apidologie 34:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner R, Page RE Jr, Erber J (2004) Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 35:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner R, Kuritz-Kaiser A, Menzel R, Erber J (2005) Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees. Learn Mem 12:626–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Morse RA (1976) The nest of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Soc 23:495–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simone-Finstrom M, Spivak M (2010) Propolis and bee health: the natural history and significance of resin use by honey bees. Apidologie. doi:10.1051/apido/2010016

  • Simone M, Evans JD, Spivak M (2009) Resin collection and social immunity in honey bees. Evolution 63:3016–3022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart AM (1967) Alarm, defense and construction behavior relationships in termites (Isoptera). Science 156:1123–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by a grant from the National Science Foundation (IOS-0717530) to M. Spivak and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship awarded to M. Simone-Finstrom. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on this manuscript.

Ethical standards

The authors declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of the United States, where they were performed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Simone-Finstrom.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Giurfa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simone-Finstrom, M., Gardner, J. & Spivak, M. Tactile learning in resin foraging honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 1609–1617 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0974-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0974-4

Keywords

Navigation