Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Structure of the social network and its influence on transmission dynamics in a honeybee colony

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Infectious processes in a social group are driven by a network of contacts that is generally structured by the organization arising from behavioral and spatial heterogeneities within the group. Although theoretical models of transmission dynamics have placed an overwhelming emphasis on the importance of understanding the network structure in a social group, empirical data regarding such contact structures are rare. In this paper, I analyze the network structure and the correlated transmission dynamics within a honeybee colony as determined by food transfer interactions and the changes produced in it by an experimental manipulation. The study demonstrates that widespread transmission in the colony is correlated to a lower clustering coefficient and higher robustness of the social network. I also show that the social network in the colony is determined by the spatial distribution of various age classes, and the resulting organizational structure provides some amount of immunity to the young individuals. The results of this study demonstrates how, using the honeybee colony as a model system, concepts in network theory can be combined with those in behavioral ecology to gain a better understanding of social transmission processes, especially those related to disease dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási A (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406:378–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RM, May RM (1992) Infectious disease of humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson PE, Jensen HJ (2005) Network properties, species abundance and evolution in a model of evolutionary ecology. J Theor Biol 232:551–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy M, Barrat A, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2005) Dynamical patterns of epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks. J Theor Biol 235:275–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS (2003) Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 59:147–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2002) Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12917–12922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH (2003) Social insect networks. Science 301:1867–1870

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell BT, Dobson A (1995) Ecology of infectious diseases in natural populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars TJ, Donnelly CA, Ferguson NM (2004) Spatial heterogeneity and the persistence of infectious diseases. J Theor Biol 229:349–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordán F, Scheuring I (2002) Searching for keystones in ecological networks. Oikos 99:607–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling MJ (1999) The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:859–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeling M (2005) The implications of network structure for epidemic dynamics. Theor Popul Biol 67:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Croft DP, James R (2007) Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May RM (2006) Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends Ecol Evol 21:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mollison D, Isham V, Grenfell B (1994) Epidemics: models and data. J R Stat Soc A 157:115–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya JM, Sole RV (2002) Small world patterns in food webs. J Theor Biol 214:405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naug D, Camazine S (2002) The role of colony organization in pathogen transmission in social insects. J Theor Biol 215:427–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naug D, Smith BH (2007) Experimentally induced change in infectious period affects transmission dynamics in a social group. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2003) Properties of highly clustered networks. Phys Rev E 68:026121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E 70:056131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Read JM, Keeling MJ (2003) Disease evolution on networks: the role of contact structure. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saramäki J, Kaski K (2005) Modelling development of epidemics with dynamic small-world networks. J Theor Biol 234:413–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofts C (1993) Algorithms for task allocation in ants (a study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55:891–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdasca J, Telo da Gama MM, Nunesa A, Bernardinoa NR, Pacheco JM, Gomes MC (2005) Recurrent epidemics in small world networks. J Theor Biol 233:553–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation, USA. I thank Ann Gibbs and Robert Wildermuth for help with the video data, H.S. Arathi for extensive discussions, and two anonymous referees for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhruba Naug.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Krause

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Naug, D. Structure of the social network and its influence on transmission dynamics in a honeybee colony. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 1719–1725 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0600-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0600-x

Keywords

Navigation