Skip to main content
Log in

C-reactive protein may misdiagnose prosthetic joint infections, particularly chronic and low-grade infections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Periprosthetic tissue cultures, sonication and synovial fluid cultures remain the gold standard for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis. However, some 15–20% culture-negative PJI are still reported. Therefore, there is the need for other diagnostic criteria. One point of concern relative to the different definitions of PJI is as to the inclusion of the c-reactive protein (CRP) and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as diagnostic criteria for PJI despite them being non-specific inflammatory blood tests.

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to determine the relevance of CRP and the ESR in the diagnosis of PJI.

Methods

All PJI with positive cultures over a two-year period in two hospitals were reviewed. The main variables of the present study were the type of prosthesis and the CRP level. More information was recorded in those patients with normal CRP: radiographs, physical examination records and the ESR.

Results

Seventy-three patients were included in study. Pre-operative CRP levels were normal (lower than 0.8 mg/dl) in 23 patients, representing 32% of all PJI with positive cultures. Low virulence micro-organisms, 12 coagulase-negative staphylococci and four P. acnes, grew in most of them. They represented 70% of all PJI with normal CRP levels. In addition, 17 patients (23% of all PJI with positive cultures) had a normal ESR, a normal physical examination (they only presented with pain) and no clear loosening was observed in the radiographs.

Conclusions

Per the American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines or the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), 23% of the patients in the present study with PJI would never have been identified. Blood inflammatory markers such as the CRP level and ESR may not be accurate as diagnostic tools in PJI, particularly to identify low-grade and chronic PJI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351:1645–1654. doi:10.1056/NEJMra040181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Portillo ME, Salvado M, Trampuz A et al (2015) Improved diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infection by inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 53:1622–1627. doi:10.1128/JCM.03683-14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR et al (2004) Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med 117:556–562. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G et al (2010) Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2102–2109. doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.01199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmerli W (2014) Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infection. J Intern Med 276:111–119. doi:10.1111/joim.12233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR et al (2013) Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56:1–10. doi:10.1093/cid/cis966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Minassian AM, Newnham R, Kalimeris E et al (2014) Use of an automated blood culture system (BD BACTEC) for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: easy and fast. BMC Infect Dis 14:233. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Portillo ME, Salvado M, Alier A et al (2014) Advantages of sonication fluid culture for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J Infect 69:35–41. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2014.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Puig-Verdie L, Alentorn-Geli E, Gonzalez-Cuevas A et al (2013) Implant sonication increases the diagnostic accuracy of infection in patients with delayed, but not early, orthopaedic implant failure. Bone Joint J 95–B:244–249. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borens O, Corvec S, Trampuz A (2012) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections. Hip Int 22(Suppl 8):S9–S14. doi:10.5301/HIP.2012.9565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the musculoskeletal infection society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2992–2994. doi:10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Della Valle C, Parvizi J, Bauer TW et al (2011) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1355–1357. doi:10.2106/JBJS.9314ebo

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad SS, Shaker A, Saffarini M et al (2016) Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4230-y

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alijanipour P, Bakhshi H, Parvizi J (2013) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the threshold for serological markers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3186–3195. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3070-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsen Ko L, Parvizi J (2016) Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection: novel developments. Orthop Clin N Am 47:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Piper KE, Fernandez-Sampedro M, Steckelberg KE et al (2010) C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and orthopedic implant infection. PLoS One 5:e9358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009358

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Renz N, Muller M, Perka C, Trampuz A (2016) Implant-associated infections – diagnostics. Chirurg. doi:10.1007/s00104-016-0234-x

    Google Scholar 

  18. Renz N, Cabric S, Janz V, Trampuz A (2015) Sonication in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: significance and practical implementation. Orthopade 44:942–945. doi:10.1007/s00132-015-3192-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ et al (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357:654–663. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perez-Prieto D, Portillo ME, Puig-Verdie L et al (2016) Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthetic joint infections: not a concern for intraoperative cultures. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 86:442–445. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.09.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deirmengian CA, Citrano PA, Gulati S et al (2016) The c-reactive protein may not detect infections caused by less-virulent organisms. J Arthroplasty 31(9 Suppl):152–155. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.060

  22. McArthur BA, Abdel MP, Taunton MJ et al (2015) Seronegative infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic infections with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and c-reactive protein level. Bone Joint J 97–B:939–944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Portillo ME, Corvec S, Borens O, Trampuz A (2013) Propionibacterium acnes: an underestimated pathogen in implant-associated infections. Biomed Res Int 2013:804391. doi:10.1155/2013/804391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Koh IJ, Cho W-S, Choi NY et al (2015) How accurate are orthopedic surgeons in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty?: A multicenter study. Knee 22:180–185. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF (2013) Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 95–B:1450–1452. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Frangiamore SJ, Siqueira MBP, Saleh A et al (2016) Synovial cytokines and the MSIS criteria are not useful for determining infection resolution after periprosthetic joint infection explantation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:1630–1639. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4710-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr. Eric L Goode for his help with English correction and style.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Pérez-Prieto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Funding

There is no funding source.

Ethical approval

This is a retrospective observational study without intervention in humans or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Prieto, D., Portillo, M.E., Puig-Verdié, L. et al. C-reactive protein may misdiagnose prosthetic joint infections, particularly chronic and low-grade infections. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1315–1319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3430-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3430-5

Keywords

Navigation