Skip to main content
Log in

Multimodal nerve monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy identifies surgical steps associated with risk of injury

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sciatic nerve palsy after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a serious complication. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a multimodal sciatic monitoring technique allows for identification of surgical steps that place the sciatic nerve at risk.

Methods

Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), and spontaneous electromyography (EMG) were monitored in a consecutive series of 34 patients (40 hips) who underwent PAO for the treatment of symptomatic hip dysplasia between January 2012 and November 2014. There were 29 females (85%) and five males (15%) with an average age of 19 years (range, 12–36 years) at the time of surgery.

Results

We detected eight temporary sciatic nerve monitoring alerts in six patients (incidence of 15%). The events included decrease in amplitude of the TcMEPs related to the position of the hip during incomplete ischium osteotomy and placement of a retractor in the sciatic notch during the posterior column osteotomy (N = 3), generalized bilateral decrease in TcMEPs during fragment manipulation and fixation in association with acute blood loss (N = 2), and a change in SSEPs during a superior pubic osteotomy and supra-acetabular osteotomy (N = 1). At the end of the procedure, TcMEPs and SSEPs were at baseline and there was no abnormal pattern on EMG in all patients. Post-operatively, at two, six, 12 weeks, and six and 12 months, no motor weakness or sensory deficits were noted.

Conclusion

Multimodal neuromonitoring allowed for identification of intra-operative steps and maneuvers that potentially place the sciatic nerve at higher risk of injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW (1988) A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:26–36

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biedermann R, Donnan L, Gabriel A, Wachter R, Krismer M, Behensky H (2008) Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy. Int Orthop 32(5):611–617. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0372-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Curry MC, Schoenecker PL (2007) Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia associated with major aspherical femoral head deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(7):1417–1423. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clohisy JC, Schutz AL, St John L, Schoenecker PL, Wright RW (2009) Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(8):2041–2052. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0842-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Crockarell J Jr, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ (1999) Early experience and results with the periacetabular osteotomy. The Mayo Clinic experience Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davey JP, Santore RF (1999) Complications of periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peters CL, Erickson JA, Hines JL (2006) Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(9):1920–1926. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00515

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaltz I, Baca G, Kim YJ, Schoenecker P, Trousdale R, Sierra R, Sucato D, Sink E, Beaule P, Millis MB, Podeszwa D, Clohisy JC (2014) Complications associated with the periacetabular osteotomy: a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(23):1967–1974. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.00113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sierra RJ, Beaule P, Zaltz I, Millis MB, Clohisy JC, Trousdale RT, group A (2012) Prevention of nerve injury after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(8):2209–2219. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2409-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Haidukewych GJ, Scaduto J, Herscovici D Jr, Sanders RW, DiPasquale T (2002) Iatrogenic nerve injury in acetabular fracture surgery: a comparison of monitored and unmonitored procedures. J Orthop Trauma 16(5):297–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Helfet DL, Anand N, Malkani AL, Heise C, Quinn TJ, Green DS, Burga S (1997) Intraoperative monitoring of motor pathways during operative fixation of acute acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11(1):2–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown DM, McGinnis WC, Mesghali H (2002) Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring during revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fee D, Sabet A (2008) Monitoring during total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative monitoring of neural function. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  14. Sutter M, Hersche O, Leunig M, Guggi T, Dvorak J, Eggspuehler A (2012) Use of multimodal intra-operative monitoring in averting nerve injury during complex hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(2):179–184. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.28019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vitale MG, Skaggs DL, Pace GI, Wright ML, Matsumoto H, Anderson RCE, Brockmeyer DL, Dormans JP, Emans JB, Erickson MA, Flynn JM, Glotzbecker MP, Ibrahim KN, Lewis SJ, Luhmann SJ, Mendiratta A, Richards BS III, Sanders JO, Shah SA, Smith JT, Song KM, Sponseller PD, Sucato DJ, Roye DP, Lenke LG (2014) Best practices in intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine deformity surgery: development of an intraoperative checklist to optimize response. Spine Deformity 2(5):333–339. doi:10.1016/j.jspd.2014.05.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pring ME, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Harper CM (2002) Intraoperative electromyographic monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 400:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Toleikis JR, American Society of Neurophysiological M (2005) Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 19(3):241–258. doi:10.1007/s10877-005-4397-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Francis L, Mohamed M, Patino M, McAuliffe J (2012) Intraoperative neuromonitoring in pediatric surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin 50(4):130–143. doi:10.1097/AIA.0b013e31826f32ae

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sloan TB, Toleikis JR, Toleikis SC, Koht A (2015) Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3% desflurane. J Clin Monit Comput 29(1):77–85. doi:10.1007/s10877-014-9571-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matheney T, Kim YJ, Zurakowski D, Matero C, Millis M (2010) Intermediate to long-term results following the bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(Suppl 1 Pt 2):115–129. doi:10.2106/JBJS.J.00646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Macdonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C, American Society of Neurophysiological M (2013) Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring—a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol: Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 124(12):2291–2316. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson KR, Vasconez HC (1995) Nerve transection without neurotonic discharges during intraoperative electromyographic monitoring. Muscle Nerve 18(2):236–238. doi:10.1002/mus.880180215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewallen DG (1998) Neurovascular injury associated with hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 47:275–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ogata K, Naito M (1986) Blood flow of peripheral nerve effects of dissection, stretching and compression. J Hand Surg 11(1):10–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalhor M, Gharehdaghi J, Schoeniger R, Ganz R (2015) Reducing the risk of nerve injury during Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: a cadaveric study. Bone Joint J 97-B(5):636–641. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.35084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo N. Novais.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No source of funding was used in this study. Eduardo Novais, Travis Heare, Lauryn Kestel, Patricia Oliver, Willy Boucharel, Jason Koerner, and Kim Strupp declare they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novais, E.N., Heare, T., Kestel, L. et al. Multimodal nerve monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy identifies surgical steps associated with risk of injury. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1543–1551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3394-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3394-x

Keywords

Navigation