Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Variation in practice preferences in management of open injuries of extremities—an international survey by SICOT research academy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Open fractures are challenging injuries and there is a lot of variation in practice preferences which may reflect the wide variations in outcome in different units across the world. A survey was done amongst the international community of SICOT membership to document the practice preferences and variations.

Methods

An online questionnaire containing 23 questions which were sub-divided into three sections covering the various aspects of open injury management was sent by email to orthopaedic trauma surgeons across the world. A total of 358 responses were evaluated and presented in this manuscript.

Results

The SICOT study confirmed wide variation in practice protocols. About 94.7 % of orthopaedic surgeons around the world use the Gustillo Anderson scoring system for assessment of open injury and 50.6 % of surgeons prefer lavage in operation theatre. For lavage, 84.6 % of surgeons preferred normal saline and for antibiotic prophylaxis, 48.3 % used a combination of second generation cephalosporin, metronidazole and an aminoglycoside for a minimum of three to five days. In 88 % of patients, orthopaedic surgeons performed the initial debridement and 69.2 % surgeons aimed for debridement within six hours. Regarding wound management, 43.9 % units preferred and were capable of soft tissue cover within 72 hours and about 26.3 % surgeons combined definitive fixation along with plastic procedure.

Conclusion

Our study documented wide variations in practice preferences across the world and showed that information and awareness about current guidelines and practices will help many to update themselves in terms of basic questions about open fracture care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. British Orthopaedic Association And British Association Of Plastic Surgeons (2009) Management of severe open lower limb fractures. 14-15

  2. Orr HW (1942) The Orr method for wounds and compound fractures. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 118(11):917. doi:10.1001/jama.1942.02830110059024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim PH, Leopold SS (2012) In brief: Gustilo-Anderson classification. [corrected]. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(11):3270–3274. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2376-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (2011) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Jt Surg 58(4):453–458

  5. Gustilo RB, Mendoza RM, Williams DN (1984) Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J Trauma 24(8):742–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nanchahal J, Nayagam S, Khan U et al (2009) Standards for the management of open fractures of the lower limb. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London

  7. Trauma JO (2010) A new classification scheme for open fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(8):457–464. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c7cb6b

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan SP, Pugliano V (2014) Controversies in initial management of open fractures. Scand J Surg 103(2):132–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ali AM, McMaster JM, Atkins B, Cogswell LK (2011) Compliance with BOA/BAPRAS standards for the management of open fractures of the lower limb (September 2009) in a specialist centre. Inj Extra 42(9):129–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Obremskey WT, Molina C, Collinge C et al (2014) Current practice in the management of open fractures among orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Part A: initial management. A Survey of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons. J Orthop Trauma doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000033

  11. Freitas AD, Franzon O (2010) Lactate as predictor of mortality in polytrauma. Arq Bras Cir Dig 28(3):163–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nanchahal J, Nayagam S, Khan U et al (2009) Standards for the management of open fractures of the lower limb. 66(1)

  13. Brumback RJ, Jones AL (1994) Interobserver agreement in the classification of open fractures of the tibia. The results of a survey of two hundred and forty-five orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(8):1162–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horn BD, Rettig ME (1993) Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures. J Orthop Trauma 7(4):357–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Halawi MJ, Morwood MP (2015) Acute management of open fractures: an evidence-based review. Orthopedics 38(11)

  16. Helfet DL, Howey T, Sanders R, Johansen K. Limb salvage versus amputation (1990) Preliminary results of the mangled extremity severity score. Clin Orthop Relat Res (256):80-86

  17. Kumar MK, Badole C, Patond K (2007) Salvage versus amputation: utility of mangled extremity severity score in severely injured lower limbs. Indian J Orthop 41(3):183–187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fodor L, Sobec R, Sita-Alb L, Fodor M, Ciuce C (2012) Mangled lower extremity: can we trust the amputation scores? Int J Burns Trauma 2(1):51–58

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shanmuganathan R (2008) The utility of scores in the decision to salvage or amputation in severely injured limbs. Indian J Orthop 42(4):368–376

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Togawa S, Yamami N, Nakayama H, Mano Y, Ikegami K, Ozeki S (2005) The validity of the mangled extremity severity score in the assessment of upper limb injuries. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87(11):1516–1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajasekaran S (2005) Ganga hospital open injury severity score—a score to prognosticate limb salvage and outcome measures in Type IIIb open tibial fractures. Indian J Orthop 39(1):4

  22. Rajasekaran S, Naresh Babu J, Dheenadhayalan J et al (2006) A score for predicting salvage and outcome in Gustilo type-IIIA and type-IIIB open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88(10):1351–1360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rajasekaran S, Sabapathy SR (2007) A philosophy of care of open injuries based on the Ganga hospital score. Injury 38(2):137–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rajasekaran S, Dheenadhayalan J, Babu JN, Sundararajan SR, Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR (2009) Immediate primary skin closure in type-III A and B open fractures: results after a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91(2):217–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rajasekaran S, Sabapathy SR, Dheenadhayalan J et al (2015) Ganga hospital open injury score in management of open injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 41(1):3–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Langer V (2014). Management of major limb injuries. Sci World J doi:10.1155/2014/640430

  27. Madhuchandra P, Rafi M, Devadoss S, Devadoss A (2015) Predictability of salvage and outcome of Gustilo and Anderson type-IIIA and type-IIIB open tibial fractures using Ganga Hospital Scoring system. Injury 46(2):282–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Agel J, Evans AR, Marsh JL, Decoster TA, Lundy DW, Kellam JF, Jones CB, Desilva GL (2013) The OTA open fracture classification: a study of reliability and agreement. J Orthop Trauma 27(7):379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guyette F, Suffoletto B, Castillo J-L, Quintero J, Callaway C, Puyana J-C (2011) Prehospital serum lactate as a predictor of outcomes in trauma patients: a retrospective observational study. J Trauma 70(4):782–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Krishna U, Joshi SP, Modh M (2009) An evaluation of serial blood lactate measurement as an early predictor of shock and its outcome in patients of trauma or sepsis. Indian J Crit Care Med 13(2):66–73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Régnier M-A, Raux M, Le Manach Y et al (2012) Prognostic significance of blood lactate and lactate clearance in trauma patients. Anesthesiology 117(6):1276–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Grey B, Rodseth RN, Muckart DJJ (2013) Early fracture stabilisation in the presence of subclinical hypoperfusion. Injury 44(2):217–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vallier HA, Wang X, Moore TA, Wilber JH, Como JJ (2013) Timing of orthopaedic surgery in multiple trauma patients: development of a protocol for early appropriate care. J Orthop Trauma 27(10):543–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Odom SR, Howell MD, Silva GS et al (2013) Lactate clearance as a predictor of mortality in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(4):999–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Billeter A, Turina M, Seifert B, Mica L, Stocker R, Keel M (2009) Early serum procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and 24-hour lactate clearance: useful indicators of septic infections in severely traumatized patients. World J Surg 33(3):558–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anglen JO (2016) Wound irrigation in musculoskeletal injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 9(4):219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Crowley DJ, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2007) Irrigation of the wounds in open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89(5):580–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Petrisor B, Jeray K, Schemitsch E et al (2008) Fluid lavage in patients with open fracture wounds (FLOW): an international survey of 984 surgeons. BMC Musculoskelet Disord doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-7

  39. Anglen JO (2005) Comparison of soap and antibiotic solutions for irrigation of lower-limb open fracture wounds. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1415–1422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fluid lavage of open wounds (FLOW) (2010) design and rationale for a large, multicenter collaborative 2 x 3 factorial trial of irrigating pressures and solutions in patients with open fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11(1):85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bhandari M, Jeray KJ, Petrisor BA et al (2015) A trial of wound irrigation in the initial management of open fracture wounds. N Engl J Med 373(27):2629–2641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee EW, Dirschl DR, Duff G, Dahners LE, Miclau T (2002). High-pressure pulsatile lavage irrigation of fresh intraarticular fractures: effectiveness at removing particulate matter from bone. J Orthop Trauma 16(3):162-5

  43. Adili A, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH (2002) The biomechanical effect of high-pressure irrigation on diaphyseal fracture healing in vivo. J Orthop Trauma 16(6):413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hassinger SM, Harding G, Wongworawat MD (2005) High-pressure pulsatile lavage propagates bacteria into soft tissue. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boyd JI, Wongworawat MD (2004) High-pressure pulsatile lavage causes soft tissue damage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenberg K (2016) Very low pressure and saline for open fracture wound irrigation. Am J Nurs 116(3):59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hannigan GD, Pulos N, Grice EA, Mehta S (2015) Current concepts and ongoing research in the prevention and treatment of open fracture infections. Adv Wound Care 4(1):59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Melvin JS, Dombroski DG, Torbert JT, Kovach SJ, Esterhai JL, Mehta S (2010) Open tibial shaft fractures: I. Evaluation and initial wound management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(1):10–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pollak AN (2010) The relationship between time to surgical débridement and incidence of infection after open high-energy lower extremity trauma. J Bone Jt Surg 92(1):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schenker ML (2012) Does timing to operative debridement affect infectious complications in open long-bone fractures? J Emerg Med 43(4):767

    Google Scholar 

  51. Calhoun JH (2012) Optimal timing of operative debridement: a known unknown. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):2–3

    Google Scholar 

  52. Werner CML, Pierpont Y, Pollak AN (2008) The urgency of surgical débridement in the management of open fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16(7):369–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Valenziano CP, Chattar-Cora D, O’Neill A, Hubli EH, Cudjoe EA (2002) Efficacy of primary wound cultures in long bone open extremity fractures: are they of any value? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122(5):259–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gosselin RA, Roberts I, Gillespie WJ (2009) Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD003764

  55. Hauser CJ, Adams CA, Eachempati SR (2006) Surgical Infection Society guideline: prophylactic antibiotic use in open fractures: an evidence-based guideline. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 7(4):379–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hoff WS, Bonadies JA, Cachecho R, Dorlac WC (2011) East Practice Management Guidelines Work Group: update to practice management guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use in open fractures. J Trauma 70(3):751–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Cross WW, Swiontkowski MF (2008) Treatment principles in the management of open fractures. Indian J Orthop 42(4):377–386

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Zalavras CG, Patzakis MJ, Holtom P (2004). Local antibiotic therapy in the treatment of open fractures and osteomyelitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (427):86-93

  59. Rajasekaran S, Giannoudis PV (2012) Open injuries of the lower extremity: issues and unknown frontiers. Injury 43(11):1783–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Evans AR (2016) The treatment of open fractures. Oper Tech Orthop 26(1):34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Godina M (1987) The tailored latissimus dorsi free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 80(2):304–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Godina M (1986) Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg 78(3):285–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Godina M, Arnez ZM, Lister GD (1991) Preferential use of the posterior approach to blood vessels of the lower leg in microvascular surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 88(2):287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of spine surgery, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam road, Coimbatore, India

    Arun Kamal, Raja Bhaskara Kanakeshwar, Ashok Shyam, Dheenadayalan Jayaramaraju, Devendra Agraharam, Ramesh Perumal & Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran

  2. Department of Orthopaedics & Spine surgery, Ganga Hospital, Mettuplayam road, Coimbatore, India

    Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran

Authors
  1. Arun Kamal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raja Bhaskara Kanakeshwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashok Shyam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dheenadayalan Jayaramaraju
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Devendra Agraharam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ramesh Perumal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical considerations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

Ganga Orthopaedic Research & Education Foundation, Coimbatore.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 362 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamal, A., Kanakeshwar, R.B., Shyam, A. et al. Variation in practice preferences in management of open injuries of extremities—an international survey by SICOT research academy. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 3–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3311-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3311-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation