Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does electromagnetic-manual guided distal locking influence rotational alignment in antegrade femoral nailing?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine whether distal locking using an electromagnetic-manual guided distal locking decreases the malrotation rate in femur fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

Methods

A total of 113 adult patients having unilateral femoral shaft fractures treated using IM nails were evaluated regarding demographic features, injury mechanism, fracture type, interval between trauma and nailing, operation time and number of image intensifier shots during the operation at least one year after nailing. Patients were divided into two groups according to distal locking technique. All patients had also undergone clinical examination for lower extremity alignment and range of motion and filled out the SF-36 questionnaire and undergone ultrasound measurement of femoral anteversion angles to reveal any rotational femoral malalignment.

Results

Group 1 consisted of 47 patients (41.6 %) with electromagnetic-manual targeting guided distal locking and group 2 consisted of 66 patients (58.4 %) with free-hand distal locking. Both groups were statistically similar regarding demographic features, injury mechanism, fracture type, interval between trauma and nailing, clinical examination and SF-36 results. Operation time and number of image intensifier shots were significantly less in group 1. No statistically significant difference was found between the femoral anteversion angles of injured and uninjured sides of the patients in both groups.

Conclusions

Although there is no significant effect on malrotation, previously known advantages lead us to state that electromagnetic-manual guided distal interlocking is an advantageous treatment option in femoral shaft fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaarsma RL, Pakvis DFM, Verdonschot N, Biert J, van Kampen A (2004) Rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18(7):403–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Riehl JT, Widmaier JC (2009) Techniques of obtaining and maintaining reduction during nailing of femur fractures. Orthopedics 32(8):581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaarsma RL, van Kempen A (2004) Rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86-B:1100–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gugala Z, Qaisi YT, Hipp JA, Lindsey RW (2011) Long-term functional implications of the iatrogenic rotational malalignment of healed diaphyseal femur fractures following intramedullary nailing. Injury 26:274–277

    Google Scholar 

  5. Strecker W, Keppler P, Gebhard F, Kinzl L (1997) Length and torsion of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79-B:1019–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gugenheim JJ, Probe RA, Brinker MR (2004) The effects of femoral shaft malrotation on lower extremity anatomy. J Orthop Trauma 18:658–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bretin P, O’Loughlin PF, Suero EM, Kendoff D, Ostermeier S, Hüfner T (2011) Influence of femoral malrotation on knee joint alignment and intra-articular contact pressures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1115–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaarsma RL, Ongkiehong BF, Grüneberg C, Verdonschot N, Duysens J, van Kampen A (2004) Compensation for rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures. An analysis by plantar pressure measurements during gait. Injury 35(12):1270–1278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tönnis D, Heinecke A (1991) Diminished femoral antetorsion syndrome: a cause of pain and osteoarthritis. J Pediatr Orthop 11:419–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krettek C (2007) Intramedullary nailing. In: Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG (eds) AO Principles of Fracture Management, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 257–287

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krettek C, Miclau T, Grün O, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H (1998) Intraoperative control of axes, rotation and length in femoral and tibial fractures. Injury 29(Suppl 3):C29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Madan S, Blakeway C (2002) Radiation exposure to surgeon and patient in intramedullary nailing of the lower limb. Injury 33(8):723–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gardner MJ, Citak M, Kendoff D, Krettek C, Hüfner T (2008) Femoral fracture malrotation caused by freehand versus navigated distal interlocking. Injury 39:176–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grewal I, Carter P (2012) Focus on: distal locking of intramedullary nails. http://www.boneandjoint.org.uk/sites/default/files/Focus%20On%20Distal%20locking%20of%20intramedullary%20nails.pdf. Accessed 03 October 2014

  15. Marsh JL, Slongo TF, Agel J et al (2007) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. J Orthop Trauma 21(10 Suppl):S1–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty five open fractures of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(4):453–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pinar R (2005) Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14(1):259–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Terjesen T, Anda S, Svenningsen S (1990) Femoral anteversion in adolescents and adults measured by ultrasound. Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:274–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindsey JD, Krieg JC (2011) Femoral malrotation following intramedullary nail fixation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19:17–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bishop JA, Rodriguez EK (2010) Closed intramedullary nailing of the femur in the lateral decubitus position. J Trauma 68(1):231–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liodakis E, Kenawey M, Petri M, Zümrüt A, Hawi N, Krettek C et al (2011) Factors influencing neck anteversion during femoral nailing: A retrospective analysis of 220 torsion-difference CTs. Injury 42:1342–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karaman O, Ayhan E, Kesmezacar H, Seker A, Unlu MC, Aydingoz O (2014) Rotational malalignment after closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures and its influence on daily life. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(7):1243–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kulig K, Harper-Hanigan K, Souza RB, Powers CM (2010) Measurement of femoral torsion by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: Concurrent validity. Phys Ther 90(11):1641–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stathopoulos I, Karampinas P, Evangelopoulos DS, Lampropoulou-Adamidou K, Vlamis J (2013) Radiation-free distal locking of intramedullary nails: Evaluation of a new electromagnetic computer-assisted guidance system. Injury 44:872–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kendoff D, Citak M, Gardner MJ, Gösling T, Krettek C, Hüfner T (2007) Navigated femoral nailing using noninvasive registration of the contralateral intact femur to restore anteversion. Technique and clinical use. J Orthop Trauma 21(10):725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Negrin LL, Vilmos V (2013) Is a magnetic-manual targeting device an appealing alternative for distal locking of tibial intramedullary nails? Arch Trauma Res 2(1):16–20

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Uruc V, Ozden R, Dogramaci Y, Kalaci A, Dikmen B, Yildiz OS et al (2013) The comparison of free-hand fluoroscopic guidance and electromagnetic navigation for distal locking of intramedullary implants. Injury 44:863–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the expertise of Professor Necdet Sut for his assistance on statistical analysis of the study. The authors also acknowledge Mr. Peter Breitling, the author and copyright holder of Clinometer for iPhone, for his permission to use the App in the study.

Conflicts of interest

All named authors of the study hereby declare that they have no conflicting interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mert Ciftdemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ciftdemir, M., Tuncel, S.A., Ozcan, M. et al. Does electromagnetic-manual guided distal locking influence rotational alignment in antegrade femoral nailing?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 507–512 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2626-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2626-1

Keywords

Navigation