Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus after tumour resection with polypropylene mesh

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications of endoprosthesis-PPP mesh composite reconstruction after bone tumour resection of the proximal humerus.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 18 patients treated in our department with endoprosthesis-PPP mesh composite reconstruction after bone tumour resection of the proximal humerus between March 2005 and October 2010. Sixteen patients (16/18) were followed up for 56 months (range, 30–96 months). The pre- and post-operative pain severity was assessed according to a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The clinical results of functional improvement were assessed by Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score at the time of final follow-up. Moreover, we also analysed complications associated with the reconstruction procedure.

Results

Most patients experienced some alleviation of pain two weeks after the reconstruction surgery. The mean MSTS upper extremity functional outcome score at the time of final follow-up was 20 (66.7 %, range, 16–27). Mean shoulder abduction was 36° (range, 18–125°) and mean shoulder flexion was 39° (range, 21–120°). Local recurrence occurred in only one patient (6.25 %), aseptic prosthesis loosening occurred in one patient (6.25 %) and anterior subluxation occurred in one patient (6.25 %).

Conclusions

The capsule reconstruction on the basis of PPP mesh can significantly reduce the recurrence rate of glenohumeral joint instability, which may offer an alternative for the capsule reconstruction after bone tumour resection of the proximal humerus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell RS (2003) Treatment of axial skeleton bone metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:198–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma S, Turcotte RE, Isler MH, Wong C (2007) Experience with cemented large segment endoprostheses for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 459:54–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dieckmann R, Liem D, Gosheger G, Henrichs MP, Höll S, Hardes J, Streitbürger A (2013) Evaluation of a reconstruction reverse shoulder for tumor surgery and tribological comparison with an anatomical shoulder arthroplasty. Int Orthop 37:451–456

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeGroot H, Donati D, Di Liddo M, Gozzi E, Mercuri M (2004) The use of cement in osteoarticular allografts for proximal humeral bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 427:190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodl RW, Gosheger G, Gebert C, Lindner N, Ozaki T, Winkelman W (2002) Reconstruction of the proximal humerus after wide resection of tumors. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84:1004–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Squire G, Grundy TJ, Ferran NA, Harper WM, Ashford RU (2013) Long-term survival of proximal humerus allografts for reconstruction following resection of malignant bone tumours. Acta Orthop Belg 79:260–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdeen A, Hoang BH, Athanasian EA, Morris CD, Boland PJ, Healey JH (2009) Allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal part of the humerus: functional outcome and survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2406–2415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Streitbuerger A, Henrichs M, Gosheger G, Ahrens H, Nottrott M, Guder W, Dieckmann R, Hardes J (2014) Improvement of the shoulder function after large segment resection of the proximal humerus with the use of an inverse tumour prosthesis. Int Orthop [Epub ahead of print]

  9. Kiss J, Sztrinkai G, Antal I, Kiss J, Szendroi M (2007) Functional result and quality of life after shoulder girdle resections in musculoskeletal tumors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:273–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Linberg BE (1999) Interscapulo-thoracic resection for malignant tumors of the shoulder joint region. Clin Orthop Relat Res 358:3–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Onoda S, Sakuraba M, Asano T, Miyamoto S, Beppu Y, Chuman H, Kawai A, Nakatani F, Kimata Y (2011) Use of vascularized free fibular head grafts for upper limb oncologic reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1244–1253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amin SN, Ebeid WA (2002) Shoulder reconstruction after tumor resection by pedicled scapular crest graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 397:133–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD, Taminiau AH (2011) Proximal humerus reconstruction after tumour resection: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction. Int Orthop 35:1375–1380

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Potter BK, Adams SC, Pitcher JD Jr, Malinin TI, Temple HT (2009) Proximal humerus reconstructions for tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1035–1041

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar D, Grimer RJ, Abudu A, Carter SR, Tillman RM (2003) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85:717–722

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Rödl R, Hoffmann C, Bürger H, Winkelmann W (2001) Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:264–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marulanda GA, Henderson E, Cheong D, Letson GD (2010) Proximal and total humerus reconstruction with the use of an aortograft mesh. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2896–2903

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roth CC, Holley TD, Winters JC (2006) Winters, synthetic slings: which material, which approach. Curr Opin Urol 16:234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Niknejad K, Plzak LS 3rd, Staskin DR, Loughlin KR (2002) Autologous and synthetic urethral slings for female incontinence. Urol Clin N Am 29:597–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bingener J, Kazantsev GB, Chopra S, Schwesinger WH (2004) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with polypropylene mesh: a study using abdominal ultrasound. JSLS 82:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  21. Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA (1980) A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153:106–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aliabadi-Wahle S, Cnota MA, Choe EU, Jacob JT, Flint LM, Ferrara JJ (1998) Efficacy of a novel synthetic material to close exposed fascial defects. South Med J 91:733–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Neer CS 2nd, McIlveen SJ (1988) Humeral head replacement with reconstruction of the tuberosities and the cuff in 4-fragment displaced fractures. Current results and technics. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 74:31–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Glanzmann MC, Goldhahn J, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR (2010) Deltoid flap reconstruction for massive rotator cuff tears: mid- and long-term functional and structural results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19:439–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang X, Tare RS, Partridge KA, Roach HI, Clarke NM, Howdle SM, Shakesheff KM, Oreffo RO (2003) Induction of human osteoprogenitor chemotaxis, proliferation, differentiation, and bone formation by osteoblast stimulating factor-1/pleiotrophin: osteoconductive biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Bone Miner Res 18:47–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Freels DB, Kilpatrick S, Gordon ES, Ward WG (2002) Animal model for evaluation of soft tissue ingrowth into various types of porous coating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 397:315–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Runne WC, van Sambeek KJ, Stierum JL, van Tongerloo RB (1989) Femoral endoprosthesis fixation with a soft, flexible low modulus stem coating. Four to six year clinical results. Orthopedics 12:529–535

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wittig JC, Bickels J, Kellar-Graney KL, Kim FH, Malawer MM (2002) Osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus: long-term results with limb-sparing surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 397:156–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kitagawa Y, Thai DM, Choong PF (2007) Reconstructions of the shoulder following tumour resection. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 15:201–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bos G, Sim F, Pritchard D, Shives T, Rock M, Askew L, Chao E (1987) Prosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 224:178–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross AC, Wilson JN, Scales JT (1987) Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:656–661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ioannou M, Papanastassiou J, Athanassiou AE, Ziras N, Kottakis S, Demertzis N (2009) Surgical options in cases of tumorous destruction of the proximal humerus: twenty-one patients followed from 4-9 years. J BUON 14:57–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scotti C, Camnasio F, Peretti GM, Fontana F, Fraschini G (2008) Modular prostheses in the treatment of proximal humerus metastases: review of 40 cases. J Orthop Traumatol 9:5–10

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zengwu Shao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Wu, Q., Liu, J. et al. Endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus after tumour resection with polypropylene mesh. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 501–506 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2597-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2597-2

Keywords

Navigation