Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The impact factors (IF) of orthopaedic journals is an important component in determining the future of orthopaedic research funding. We aim to characterise the trend in journal IF over the last decade and draw comparisons with other surgical specialties.

Methods

We conducted an analysis of impact factors from Journal Citation Reports between 2000 and 2010.

Results

Between 2000 and 2010 the number of orthopaedic journals increased from 24 to 41, more than any other surgical specialty and the mean IF increased from 0.842 to 1.400. Journals printed in the English language had a significantly higher IF in the year 2010 (1.64 vs. 0.33, p = 0.01) than those printed in other languages. English language journals published in the US had significantly higher mean 2010 IF (1.932 vs. 1.243, p = 0.025) than those published in Europe, and this had changed compared with 2000 mean IF (0.978 Vs. 0.704, p = 0.360). Orthopaedics was ranked sixth out of 11 surgical subspecialties in 2000 but dropped to seventh out of 11 in 2010.

Conclusions

The quality of orthopaedic journals has significantly increased over the last decade and this has been accompanied by a rise in mean IF. It is important that orthopaedics continues to improve the quality of research, which may help orthopaedic researchers secure funding in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Christenson JA, Sigelman L (1985) Accrediting knowledge: journal stature and citation impact in social science. Soc Sci Q 66(4):964–975

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garfield E (1955) Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 122(3159):108–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomson Reuters (1994) The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor/. Accessed 08 January 2013

  4. Isohanni M (2005) Peer review—still the well-functioning quality control and enhancer in scientific research. Acta Psychiatr Scand 112(3):165–166. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00601.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seglen PO (1997) Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52(11):1050–1056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seglen PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314(7079):498–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith R (2008) Beware the tyranny of impact factors. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(2):125–126. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.20258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Institute for Scientific Information (2012) Science citation index, journal citation reports, 1997. Institute for Scientific Information, Philidelphia, PA, USA

  9. Chen M, Zhao MH, Kallenberg CGM (2011) The impact factor of rheumatology journals: An analysis of 2008 and the recent 10 years. Rheumatol Int 31(12):1611–1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Postma E (2007) Inflated impact factors? The true impact of evolutionary papers in non-evolutionary journals. PLoS One 2(10):e999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hakkalamani S, Rawal A, Hennessy MS, Parkinson RW (2006) The impact factor of seven orthopaedic journals: factors influencing it. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):159–162. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B2.16983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurmis AP (2003) Current concepts review: understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg A 85(12):2449–2454

    Google Scholar 

  13. Siebelt M, Siebelt T, Pilot P, Bloem RM, Bhandari M, Poolman RW (2010) Citation analysis of orthopaedic literature; 18 major orthopaedic journals compared for impact factor and SCImago. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:4. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bosker BH, Verheyen CC (2006) The international rank order of publications in major clinical orthopaedic journals from 2000–2004. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):156–158

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hecht F, Hecht BK, Sandberg AA (1998) The journal “impact factor”: a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 104(2):77–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Saper CB (1999) What’s in a citation impact factor? A journal by any other measure. J Comp Neurol 411(1):1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sieck GC (2000) The “impact factor”: what it means to the impact of applied physiology. J Appl Physiol 89(3):865–866

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boldt J, Haisch G, Maleck WH (2000) Changes in the impact factor of anesthesia/critical care journals within the past 10 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 44(7):842–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurmis AP (2003) Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(12):2449–2454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. HEFCE (2009) Research Excellence Framework. Second consultation on the assessment and funding of research. http://www.hefceacuk/uk/pubs/hefce/2009/09_38/09_38pdf. Accessed 08 January 2013

  21. HEFCE (2011) Research Excellence Framework 2014: Assessment framework and guidance on submissions. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/pubs/2011/02_11/02_11.pdf. Accessed 08 January 2013

  22. Association BO (2011) BOA: our research strategy. http://www.boa.ac.uk/JA/Pages/home.aspx. Accessed 19 January 2012

  23. Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):388–396

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parsons NR, Hiskens R, Price CL, Achten J, Costa ML (2011) A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(9):1154–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh JA, Murphy S, Bhandari M (2009) Assessment of the methodologic quality of medical and surgical clinical trials in patients with arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 36(12):2642–2654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Okike K, Kocher MS, Torpey JL, Nwachukwu BU, Mehlman CT, Bhandari M (2011) Level of evidence and conflict of interest disclosure associated with higher citation rates in orthopedics. J Clin Epidemiol 64(3):331–338. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Trauma & Orthopaedics, London Deanery, London, UK

    Robert Moverley & Donald James Davidson

  2. Trauma & Orthopaedics, Northern Deanery, London, UK

    Kenneth S. Rankin & Iain McNamara

  3. Trauma & Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough, Middlesbrough, UK

    Mike Reed

  4. University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK

    Andrew P. Sprowson

  5. Southwest Thames Rotation, London Deanery, 12 Pinfold Road, London, SW16 2SN, UK

    Robert Moverley

Authors
  1. Robert Moverley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenneth S. Rankin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iain McNamara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donald James Davidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mike Reed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrew P. Sprowson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Moverley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moverley, R., Rankin, K.S., McNamara, I. et al. Impact factors of orthopaedic journals between 2000 and 2010: trends and comparisons with other surgical specialties. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 561–567 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1769-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1769-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation