Skip to main content
Log in

Timing in hip arthroscopy: does surgical timing change clinical results?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To our knowledge, there is no report in the orthopaedic literature that correlates the duration of hip pain with the results of hip arthroscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) with patient satisfaction in a prospective study over a two year period.

Methods

We present a prospective single-surgeon series of 525 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for a labral tear, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), or a chondral lesion. Modified HHS was recorded for all patients at the time of surgery and at six weeks, six months and one, two and three years after hip arthroscopy. At the time of surgery, patients were divided into three groups based on duration of preoperative symptoms: group A, under 6 months; group B, six months to three years; group C, over three years.

Results

Mean age was 39 years. There were significantly better outcomes for patients who underwent surgery within six months of symptom onset compared with those who waited longer. Patients who had symptoms for over 3 years by the time of surgery had a significantly poorer result than those with a shorter symptom duration and a higher chance of requiring revision surgery.

Conclusions

We recommend that patients with a diagnosis of labral tear, FAI or a chondral lesion should undergo hip arthroscopic surgery within six months of symptom onset. Patients with persistent symptoms for over three years should be made aware of the poorer outcome after hip arthroscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, Kelly BT (2008) The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy 24:1135–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy J, Jackson MP, O’Kelly P, Moran R (2010) Timing of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in athletes and the incidence of secondary pathology within the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:362–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE (2007) Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis–what the radiologist should know. Am J Roentgenol 188:1540–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tonnis D (1987) Congenital dysplasia and dislocation of the hip in children and adults. Springer, New York, pp 113–30

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Byrd JW, Jones KS (2000) Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 16:578–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simpson J, Sadri H, Villar R (2010) Hip arthroscopy technique and complications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:S68–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Outerbridge R (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43B:752–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crawford JR, Villar RN (2005) Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1459–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Botser IB, Smith TW Jr, Nasser R, Domb BG (2011) Open surgical dislocation versus arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison of clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 27:270–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffiths EJ, Khanduja V (2012) Hip arthroscopy: evolution, current practice and future developments. Int Orthop 36:1115–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Imam S, Khanduja V (2011) Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement. Int Orthop 35:1427–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahlén M, Lidén M (2011) A comparison of the clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft with special emphasis on the timing of the reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:488–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan KM (2009) Hip labral tears, economics in sports medicine and guidelines for NSAID use. Br J Sports Med 43:547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Streich NA, Gotterbarm T, Barié A, Schmitt H (2009) Prognostic value of chondral defects on the outcome after arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1257–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA (2006) Acetabular labral tears. Phys Ther 86:110–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hickman JM, Peters CL (2001) Hip pain in the young adult: diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the acetabular labrum and acetabular dysplasia. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 30:459–67

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Souza BG, Dani WS, Honda EK, Ricioli W Jr, Guimarães RP, Ono NK, Polesello GC (2010) Do complications in hip arthroscopy change with experience? Arthroscopy 26:1053–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Aprato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aprato, A., Jayasekera, N. & Villar, R. Timing in hip arthroscopy: does surgical timing change clinical results?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 2231–2234 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1655-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1655-x

Keywords

Navigation