Skip to main content
Log in

Reattachment of the greater trochanter in total hip arthroplasty: the pin-sleeve system compared with the Dall-Miles cable grip system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two different types of fixation systems used to reattach the greater trochanter after revision or total hip arthroplasty. This is a retrospective review of the results of patients that were treated with the two systems. We reviewed the clinical and radiological records of 35 hips with the Dall-Miles cable grip system (DMCGS) and 42 hips with the pin-sleeve system (PSS); follow-up averaged 24 months (range, 4–54) and 30 months (range, 11–42), respectively. The incidences of unsatisfactory clinical and radiological results in the PSS group was less than half that in the DMCGS group. Significant differences were found between the groups with respect to discomfort, tenderness, pain on motion, cable fragmentation, and bone absorption. Compared with the DMCGS, these results suggest the PSS could be the instrument of choice for re-attachment of the greater trochanter in hip arthroplasty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amstutz HC, Maki S (1978) Complications of trochanteric osteotomy in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60(A):214–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amstutz HC, Mai LL, Schmidt I (1984) Results of interlocking wire trochanteric reattachment and technique refinements to prevent complications following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183:82–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bal BS, Maurer BT, Harris WH (1998) Trochanteric union following revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:29–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Browne AO, Sheehan JM (1986) Trochanteric osteotomy in Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 211:128–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke RP Jr, Shea WD, Bierbaum BE (1979) Trochanteric osteotomy: analysis of pattern of wire fixation failure and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:102–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dall DM, Miles AW (1983) Reattachment of the greater trochanter. The use of the trochanter cable-grip system. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 65(B):55–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frankel A, Booth RE Jr, Balderston RA, Cohn J, Rothman RH (1993) Complications of trochanteric osteotomy. Long-term implications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 288:209–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glover MG, Convery FR (1989) Migration of fractured greater trochanteric osteotomy wire with resultant sciatica. A report of two cases. Orthopedics 12:743–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gottschalk FA, Morein G, Weber F (1988) Effect of the position of the greater trochanter on the rate of union after trochanteric osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3:235–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris WH, Crothers OD (1978) Reattachment of the greater trochanter in total hip-replacement arthroplasty. A new technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:211–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Itoman M, Sekiguchi M, Izumi T, Uchiyama K, Motobu J, Kuramoto K (1999) Development of new tension wiring system (pin-sleeve system). Rinsho Seikei Geka (Clin Orthop Surg) 34:735–744 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen NF, Harris WH (1986) A system for trochanteric osteotomy and reattachment for total hip arthroplasty with a ninety-nine percent union rate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:174–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kavanagh BF, Ilstrup DM, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1985) Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67(A):517–526

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koyama K, Higuchi F, Kubo M, Okawa T, Inoue A (2001) Reattachment of the greater trochanter using the Dall-Miles cable grip system in revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 6:22–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy JC, Bono JV, Turner RH, Kremchek T, Lee J (1999) The outcome of trochanteric reattachment in revision total hip arthroplasty with a cable grip system: mean 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 14:810–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritter MA, Eizember LE, Keating EM, Faris PM (1991) Trochanteric fixation by cable grip in hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73(B):580–581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schutzer SF, Harris WH (1988) Trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. 97% union rate using a comprehensive approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:172–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Silverton CD, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Kull L, Conley A, Galante JO (1996) Complications of a cable grip system. J Arthroplasty 11:400–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Volz RG, Brown FW (1977) The painful migrated ununited greater trochanter in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59(A):1091–1093

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64(A):1295–1306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naonobu Takahira.

Additional information

Authors’ contributions: N.T. performed the clinical and radiological evaluation and analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahira, N., Itoman, M., Uchiyama, K. et al. Reattachment of the greater trochanter in total hip arthroplasty: the pin-sleeve system compared with the Dall-Miles cable grip system. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 793–797 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-0989-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-0989-5

Keywords

Navigation