Skip to main content
Log in

Intramedullary tibial nailing in distal third tibial fractures: distal locking screws and fracture non-union

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distal third tibial fractures are prone to non-union following tibial nail insertion. The purpose of this study was to assess the union of distal third tibial fractures in patients who have undergone intra-medullary (IM) tibial nailing with one versus two distal locking screws. Sixty-five patients who had intramedullary tibial nail fixation were retrospectively analysed. Our results showed that 80% of non-unions in distal third fractures had only one distal locking screw compared to 20% who had two distal locking screws. This is statistically significant (p<0.01). We therefore conclude that two distal locking screws are essential for distal third fractures.

Résumé

Les fractures du tiers distal du tibia sont réputées entraîner des retards de consolidation après enclouage. Le propos de cette étude est d’étudier la consolidation de ce type de fracture chez les patients ayant bénéficié d’un enclouage centro médullaire avec une ou deux vis de verrouillage distal. 65 patients ont ainsi été analysés de manière rétrospective. Les résultats sont les suivants 80% des pseudarthroses avait une seule vis de verrouillage distal alors que seulement 20% des pseudarthroses sont survenues chez les patients ayant un verrouillage avec deux vis distales. Il existe une différence significative (p < 0.01) entre ces deux techniques, le verrouillage distal avec deux vis est essentiel dans ce type de fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bone LB, Kassman S, Stegeman P, France J (1994) Prospective study of union rate of open tibial fractures treated with locked, unreamed intramedullary nails. J Orthop Trauma 8(1):45–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Court Brown CM, Christie J, McQueen MM (1990) Closed intramedullary tibial nailing: its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 72-B(4):605–611

    Google Scholar 

  3. Court Brown CM, Gustillo T, Shaw AD (1997) Knee pain after intramedullary tibia nailing: its incidence, aetiology, and outcome. J Orthop Trauma 11:103–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Court Brown CM, Keating JF, Christie J, McQueen MM (1955) Exchange intramedullary nailing: its use in aseptic non-union. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 77-B:407–411

    Google Scholar 

  5. Court Brown CM, McBirnie J (1955) The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 77-B:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  6. Court Brown CM, McQueen MM, Quaba AA, Christie J (1991) Locked intramedullary nailing of open tibial fractures. J Bone Jt Surg [Br] 73-B:959–964

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dogra AS, Ruiz AL, Thompson NS, Nolan PC (2000) Dia-metaphyseal distal tibial fractures—treatment with a shortened intramedullary nail. Injury 31(10) 799–804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gugala Z, Nana A, Lindsey W (2001) Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement. Injury 32(4):SD21–SD25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kneifel T, Buckley R (1996) Comparison of one versus two distal locking screws in tibial fractures treated with undreamed tibia nail; a prospective randomised clinical trial. Injury 27(4):271–273:A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Megas P, Zouboulis P, Papadopoulos AX, Karageorgos A, Lambiris E (2003) Distal tibial fractures and non-unions treated with shortened intramedullary nail. Int Orthop 27(6) 348–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubinstein RA, Green JM, Duwelius P (1992) Intramedullary interlocked tibial nailing. J Trauma 6(1):90–95

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruiz AL, Kealy WDC, McCoy GF (2000) Implant failure in tibial nailing. Injury 31(5):359–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sean E, Schwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA (2005) Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Jt Surg [AM] 87:1213–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Templemann D, Thomas M, Varecka T, Kyle R (1995) Exchanged reamed intramedullary nailing for delayed union and non-union of the tibia. Clin Ortop 315:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toivanen AK, Vaisto BM, Kannus P et al (2002) Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of tibial shaft. J Bone Jt Surg [AM] 84-A:580–585

    Google Scholar 

  16. Whittle AP, Russel TA, Taylor JC, Lavelle DG (1992) Treatment of open fractures of the tibia with the use of interlocking nailing without reaming. J Bone Jt Surg 74(8):1162–1171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aso Mohammed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohammed, A., Saravanan, R., Zammit, J. et al. Intramedullary tibial nailing in distal third tibial fractures: distal locking screws and fracture non-union. International Orthopaedics (SICO 32, 547–549 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0356-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0356-3

Keywords

Navigation