Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms: pathologic classification, clinical implications, imaging spectrum and mimics

  • Pictorial essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms are uncommon, but important to recognize with imaging due to malignant potential. Peritoneal seeding and pseudomyxoma peritonei can occur with both frankly malignant as well as low-grade appendiceal neoplasms. Prospective imaging identification of potential appendiceal neoplasm is paramount to clinical/surgical management. When a mucinous appendiceal neoplasm is suspected, a right hemicolectomy with lymph node dissection is the preferred surgical management. Unfortunately, accurate preoperative diagnosis can be challenging due to a wide range of clinical presentations and overlapping imaging appearances of appendiceal neoplasms with benign entities. Using the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) pathologic classification as a framework, we provide a comprehensive multi-modality pictorial essay detailing the broad array of imaging findings of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms and common imaging mimics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aho AJ, Heinonen R, Lauren P (1973) Benign and malignant mucocele of the appendix. Histological types and prognosis. Acta Chir Scand 139:392–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Higa E, Rosai J, Pizzimbono CA, Wise L (1973) Mucosal hyperplasia, mucinous cystadenoma, and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the appendix. A re-evaluation of appendiceal “mucocele”. Cancer 32:1525–1541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ, Zoetmulder FA (2008) Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:196–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patil R, et al. (2013) Mucocele of the appendix, five year retrospective study. J Public Health Med Res 1:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system, 4th edn. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez Moreno S, Shmookler BM, Sugarbaker PH (1998) Appendiceal mucocele. Contraindication to laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 12:1177–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr NJ, McCarthy WF, Sobin LH (1995) Epithelial non carcinoid tumors and tumor-like lesions of the appendix. A clinicopathologic study of 184 patients with a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer 75:757–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Madwed D, Mindelzun R, Jeffrey RB Jr (1992) Mucocele of the appendix: imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Caspi B, Cassif E, Auslender R, et al. (2004) The onion skin sign: a specific sonographic marker of appendiceal mucocele. J Ultrasound Med 23:117–121 (quiz 122–113)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dachman AH, Lichtenstein JE, Friedman AC (1985) Mucocele of the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:923–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Low RN (2016) Preoperative and surveillance MR imaging of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Oncol 7(1):58–71

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Uradodmo LT, Darwi PE (2009) Evaluation of subepithelial abnormalities of the appendix by endoscopic ultrasound. Diagn Ther Endosc 2009:295379

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zaharie F, Tomus C, Mocan L, et al. (2012) Intestinal obstruction secondary to appendiceal mucocele. Chirurgia (Bucur) 107:802–804

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyakura Y, Yokota S, Horie H, et al. (2012) Intestinal strangulation caused by a mucocele of the appendix: report of a case. Surg Today 42:1215–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feliu F, Ruega JC, Escuder J, et al. (2013) Adult intussusception of appendicular mucinous cystadenoma. Int Surg 98:392–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coulier B, Pestieau S, Hamels J, Lefebvre Y (2002) US and CT diagnosis of complete cecocolic intussusception caused by an appendiceal mucocele. Eur Radiol 12:324–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalu E, Croucher C (2005) Appendiceal mucocele: a rare differential diagnosis of a cystic right adnexal mass. Arch Gynecol Obstet 271:86–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Attarde V, Patil P, Apte A, et al. (2011) Sonographic appearance of a giant appendicular mucocele. J Clin Ultrasound 39:290–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sato H, Fujisaki M, Takahashi T, et al. (2001) Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in the appendix in a patient with nonrotation: report of a case. Surg Today 31:1012–1015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang H, Chen YQ, Wei R, et al. (2013) Appendiceal mucocele: a diagnostic dilemma in differentiating malignant from benign lesions with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W590–W595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bennett GL, Tanpitukpongse TP, Macari M, Cho KC, Babb JS (2009) CT diagnosis of mucocele of the appendix in patients with acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:W103–W110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Esquivel J, Sugarbaker PH (2000) Clinical presentation of the pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome. Br J Surg 87:1414–1418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sulkin TV, O’Neill H, Amin AI, Moran B (2002) CT in pseudomyxoma peritonei: a review of 17 cases. Clin Radiol 57:608–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Newton AD, Bartlett EK, Karaousis GC (2016) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a review of factors contributing to morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Oncol 7(1):99–111

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiology Department, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA

    Alanna Van Hooser, Todd R. Williams & Daniel T. Myers

Authors
  1. Alanna Van Hooser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Todd R. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel T. Myers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd R. Williams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All three authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. No grants or funding involved in this project.

Ethical approval

The study is a retrospective review of the medical record and is compliant with Henry Ford Hospital’s Institutional Review Board guidelines (IRB# 7550). This article does not contain studies with human or animal participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Hooser, A., Williams, T.R. & Myers, D.T. Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms: pathologic classification, clinical implications, imaging spectrum and mimics. Abdom Radiol 43, 2913–2922 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1561-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1561-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation