Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiparametric Gd-EOB-DTPA magnetic resonance in diagnosis of HCC: dynamic study, hepatobiliary phase, and diffusion-weighted imaging compared to histology after orthotopic liver transplantation

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) performance during dynamic (DYN) phases, hepatobiliary (HB) phase and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared with pathological findings in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with different conditions, such as stage of chronic liver disease, histological grading, nodule size, and occurrence of previous treatments.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 64 nodules reported as HCC at pathological analysis on 28 explanted livers, examined about 3 months before OLT using a 1.5 T device and 16 channels array after intravenous GD-EOB-DTPA injection. Lesions features and hepatic functional values were recorded for each patient. Two radiologists performed in consensus the analysis of nodules on DYN, HB, and DWI. MR findings were compared with those of pathological anatomy. Diagnostic indicators were calculated for each technique.

Results

DYN and HB showed no statistically significant difference in sensitivity (88% and 98%, respectively), diagnostic accuracy (90.6% and 99.9%), and specificity (both 100%), for all Child-Pugh scores, gradings, sizes, and presence or absence of previous treatments. DWI had a statistically significant lower sensitivity compared to DYN (p = 0.001) and HB (p < 0.0001); its sensitivity was significantly inferior for Child-Pugh Class B nodules than for Child-Pugh Class A ones (p = 0.00005). DWI sensitivity presented a significant increase (p = 0.03) with grading and presence of previous treatments (p = 0.0006). ADC values showed no statistically significant changes with Child-Pugh score, grading and nodules size; statistically significant increase was instead found for treated vs. untreated nodules (p = 0.016).

Conclusions

In a multiparametric HCC MRI assessment, DYN and HB play the leading role, with DWI faring acceptably well for Child-Pugh Class A nodules and treated ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stigliano R, Marelli L, Yu D, et al. (2007) Seeding following percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma. What is the risk and the outcome? Seeding risk for percutaneous approach of HCC. Cancer Treat Rev 33:437–447

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atwell TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK, et al. (2010) Incidence of bleeding after 15,181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(3):784–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zech CJ, Bartolozzi C, Sage PB, et al. (2013) Consensus report of the Fifth International Forum for Liver MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:97–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jang H-J, Kim TK, Burns PN, et al. (2007) Enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced US: comparison with histologic differentiation. Radiology 244:898–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolondi L, Gaiani S, Celli N, et al. (2005) Characterization of small nodules in cirrhosis by assessment of vascularity: the problem of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42:27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huppertz A, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, et al. (2004) Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings. Radiology 230:266–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Golfieri R, Grazioli L, Orlando E, et al. (2012) Which is the best MRI marker of malignancy for atypical cirrhotic nodules: hypointensity in hepatobiliary phase alone or combined with other features? Classification after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:648–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahn SS, Mj Kim, Lim SJ, et al. (2010) Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 255:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haradome H, Grazioli L, Tinti R, et al. (2011) Additional value of gadoxetic acid-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with dynamic triple-phase multidetector CT imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:69–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Taouli B, Koh DM (2010) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 254:47–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. (2008) Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 246:812–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruegel M, Gaa J, Waldt S, et al. (2008) Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five t2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1421–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kele PG, van der Jagt EJ (2010) Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. World J Gastroenterol 16:1567–1576

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parente DB, Perez RM, Eiras-Araujo A, et al. (2012) MR imaging of hypervascular lesions in the cirrhotic liver: a diagnostic dilemma. Radiographics 32:767–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan Z, Ye X-D, Dong S, et al. (2010) Role of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating response after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 75(1):e9–e14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazzaferro V, Bhoori S, Sposito C, et al. (2011) Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an evidence-based analysis of 15 years of experience. Liver Transplant 17(Suppl 2):S44–S57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) EASL–EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56(4):908–943

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bartolozzi C, Battaglia V, Bargellini I, et al. (2013) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of 102 nodules in cirrhosis: correlation with histological findings on explanted livers. Abdom Imaging 38:290–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park MJ, Kim YK, Lee MW, et al. (2012) Small hepatocellular carcinomas: improved sensitivity by combining gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging patterns. Radiology 264:761–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goshima Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. (2008) Evaluating local hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence post-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: is diffusion-weighted MRI reliable as an indicator? J Magn Reson Imaging 27:834–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient and histopathologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen CY, Li CW, Kuo YT, et al. (2006) Early response of hepatocellular carcinoma to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: choline levels and MR diffusion constants–initial experience. Radiology 239:448–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakanishi M, Chuma M, Hige S, et al. (2012) Relationship between diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and histological tumor grading of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1302–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saborido PB, Diaz JCM, de los Galanes SJ, et al. (2005) Does preoperative fine needle aspiration-biopsy produce tumor recurrence in patients following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma? Transplant Proc 37:3874–3877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Caturelli E, Solmi L, Anti M (2004) Ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy of early hepatocellular carcinoma complicating liver cirrhosis: a multicentre study. Gut 53:1356–1362

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Radiology University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy

    Riccardo Faletti, Maria Carla Cassinis, Paolo Fonio, Laura Bergamasco, Luca Jacopo Pavan, Alessandro Rapellino, Ezio David & Giovanni Gandini

Authors
  1. Riccardo Faletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Carla Cassinis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paolo Fonio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laura Bergamasco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luca Jacopo Pavan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alessandro Rapellino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ezio David
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Giovanni Gandini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Faletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faletti, R., Cassinis, M.C., Fonio, P. et al. Multiparametric Gd-EOB-DTPA magnetic resonance in diagnosis of HCC: dynamic study, hepatobiliary phase, and diffusion-weighted imaging compared to histology after orthotopic liver transplantation. Abdom Imaging 40, 46–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0180-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0180-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation