Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acute pancreatitis: value and impact of CT severity index

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis is a disease with a broad spectrum of findings that varies in severity from mild interstitial or edematous pancreas to severe forms with significant local and systemic complications that are associated with a substantial degree of morbidity and mortality. Several scoring systems are used to assess the severity and predict the outcome and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. These include the Ranson, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Glasgow scales. The CT severity index (CTSI) derived by Balthazar et al. has become widely used for description of CT findings in acute pancreatitis. The purpose of this project was to examine the current best evidence about regarding the effect of using a CTSI on patient outcome and its value in comparison with other widely used scoring systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) Modified CT Severity Index for Evaluating Acute Pancreatitis: Improved Correlation with Patient Outcome Am. J. Roentgenol 183:1261–1265

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balthazar EJ, Freeny PC, van Sonnenberg E (1994) Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology 193:297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Rose DF, et al. (1974) Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Cynecol Obstet 139:69–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, et al. (1985) Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology 156:767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Jimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1989) APACHE II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancent 2:201–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blamey SL, Imrie CW, O’Neil J, et al. (1984) Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. Gut 25:1340–1346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223:603–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stantent R, Frey CF (1990) Comprehensive management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic abscess. Arch Surg 125:1269–1275

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mackenzie R, Dixon AK (1995) Measuring the effects of imaging: an evaluative framework. Clin Radiol Aug 50(8):513–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Staunton M (2007) Evidence-based radiology: steps 1 and 2—asking answerable questions and searching for evidence. Radiology 242(1):23–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Halligan S, Altman D (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4—appraise and apply systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Radiology 243(1):13–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Centre for evidence-based medicine, Oxford University. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations. http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp. Accessed on June 11, 2007

  14. Gurleyik G, Emir S, Kilicoglu G, et al. (2005) Computed tomography severity index APACHE II score, serum CRP concentration for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. JOP 6(6):562–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leung TK, Lee CM, Lin SY, et al. (2005) Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. World J Gastroenterol 11(38):6049–6052

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Sanctis JT, Lee MJ, Gazelle GS, et al. (1997) Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs. APACHE II. Clin Radiol 52(11):842–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dodd JD (2007) Evidence-based practice in radiology: steps 3 and 4—appraise and apply diagnostic radiology Lit Radiol 242:342–354

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bradley EL (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the international symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Casas JD, Díaz R, Valderas G, et al. (2004) Prognostic value of CT in the early assessment of patients with Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Roentgenol 182:569–574

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors both trained in evidence-based practice techniques with the SVUH EBP Group. The authors wish to thank Dr. D. Malone for his advice during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulnasser Alhajeri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alhajeri, A., Erwin, S. Acute pancreatitis: value and impact of CT severity index. Abdom Imaging 33, 18–20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9315-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9315-0

Key words

Navigation