Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors: a 5-year analysis of non-diagnostic biopsies

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To study non-diagnostic CT-guided musculoskeletal biopsies and take steps to minimize them. Specifically we asked: (1) What malignant diagnoses have a higher non-diagnostic rate? (2) What factors of a non-diagnostic biopsy may warrant more aggressive pursuit? (3) Do intra-procedural frozen pathology (FP) or point-of-care (POC) cytology reduce the non-diagnostic biopsy rate?

Materials and methods

This study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. We retrospectively reviewed 963 consecutive CT-guided musculoskeletal biopsies. We categorized pathology results as malignant, benign, or non-diagnostic and recorded use of FP or POC cytology. Initial biopsy indication, final diagnosis, method of obtaining the final diagnosis of non-diagnostic biopsies, age of the patient, and years of biopsy attending experience were recorded. Groups were compared using Pearson’s χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

In all, 140 of 963 (15 %) biopsies were non-diagnostic. Lymphoma resulted in more non-diagnostic biopsies (P < 0.0001). While 67% of non-diagnostic biopsies yielded benign diagnoses, 33% yielded malignant diagnoses. Patients whose percutaneous biopsy was indicated due to the clinical context without malignancy history almost always generated benign results (96 %). Whereas 56% of biopsies whose indication was an imaging finding of a treatable lesion were malignant, 20% of biopsies whose indication was a history of malignancy were malignant. There was no statistically significant difference in the nondiagnostic biopsy rates of pediatric versus adult patients (P = 0.8) and of biopsy attendings with fewer versus more years of experience (P = 0.5). The non-diagnostic rates of biopsies with FP (8 %), POC cytology (25 %), or neither (24 %) were significantly different (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Lymphoma is the malignant diagnosis most likely to result in a non-diagnostic biopsy. If the clinical and radiologic suspicion for malignancy is high, repeat biopsy is warranted. If the clinical context suggests a benign lesion, a non-diagnostic biopsy may be considered reassuring. Frozen pathology may decrease the non-diagnostic biopsy rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabandhu T, Tan MH, Mankin HJ. Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:759–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altuntas AO, Slavin J, Smith PJ, Schlict SM, Powell GJ, Ngan S, et al. Accuracy of computed tomography guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75:187–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser-Hill MA, Renfrew DL. Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions, 1: effective accuracy and diagnostic utility. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:809–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fraser-Hill MA, Renfrew DL, Hilsenrath PE. Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions, 2: cost-effectiveness. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:813–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pohlig F, Kirchhoff C, Lenze U, Schauwecker J, Burgkart R, Rechl H, et al. Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res. 2012;17:29.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A, Simon MA. Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:644–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Springfield DS, Rosenberg A. Biopsy: complicated and risky. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:639–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yao L, Nelson SD, Seeger LL, Eckardt JJ, Eilber FR. Primary musculoskeletal neoplasms: effectiveness of core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 1999;212:682–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roh J-L, Lee Y-W, Kim J-M. Clinical utility of fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of head and neck lymphoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:817–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Didolkar MM, Anderson ME, Hochman MG, Rissmiller JG, Goldsmith JD, Gebhardt MG, et al. Image guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions: are nondiagnostic results clinically useful? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3601–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogilvie CM, Torbert JT, Finstein JL, Fox EJ, Lackman RD. Clinical utility of percutaneous biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;450:95–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Potter BK. CORR Insights®: image guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions—are nondiagnostic results clinically useful? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:3610–1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu JS, Goldsmith JD, Horwich PJ, Shetty SK, Hochman MG. Bone and soft-tissue lesions: what factors affect diagnostic yield of image-guided core-needle biopsy? Radiology. 2008;248:962–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang J, Frassica FJ, Fayad L, Clark DP, Weber KL. Analysis of nondiagnostic results after image-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3103–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gustafson P, Dreinhöfer KE, Rydholm A. Soft tissue sarcoma should be treated at a tumor center: a comparison of quality of surgery in 375 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:47–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barman I, Dingari NC, Saha A, McGee S, Galindo LH, Liu W, et al. Application of Raman spectroscopy to identify microcalcifications and underlying breast lesions at stereotactic core needle biopsy. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3206–15.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi SH, Chae EJ, Kim J-E, Kim EY, Oh SY, Hwang HJ, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided aspiration and core biopsy of pulmonary nodules smaller than 1 cm: analysis of outcomes of 305 procedures from a tertiary referral center. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:964–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorenz JM. Updates in percutaneous lung biopsy: new indications, techniques and controversies. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2012;29:319–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Adams J, Wu HH. The utility of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic tumors to the lung: a retrospective examination of 1,032 cases. Acta Cytol. 2012;56:590–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Londoño DC, Wuerstle MC, Thomas AA, Salazar LE, Hsu J-WY, Danial T, et al. Accuracy and implications of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of renal masses. Perm J. 2013;17:4–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park SY, Park BK, Kim CK, Kwon GY. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy of small renal masses: diagnostic rate and limitations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dedhia PH, Rubio GA, Cohen MS, Miller BS, Gauger PG, Hughes DT. Potential effects of molecular testing of indeterminate thyroid nodule fine needle aspiration biopsy on thyroidectomy volume. World J Surg. 2014

  23. Tatomirovic Z, Skuletic V, Bokun R, Trimcev J, Radic O, Cerovic S, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of head and neck masses: accuracy and diagnostic problems. J BUON. 2009;14:653–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fung AD, Collins JA, Campassi C, Ioffe OB, Staats PN. Performance characteristics of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer employing rapid on-site evaluation of adequacy: analysis of 136 cases and review of the literature. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013

  25. Mahony GT, Mahony BS. Low nondiagnostic rate for fine-needle capillary sampling biopsy of thyroid nodules: a singular experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:2155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao H, Xie Z, Zhou Z-L, Sui X-Z, Wang J. Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in intrapulmonary lesions. Chin Med J. 2013;126:4312–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Odejide OO, Cronin AM, DeAngelo DJ, Bernazzoli ZA, Jacobson JO, Rodig SJ, et al. Improving the quality of bone marrow assessment: impact of operator techniques and use of a specimen preparation checklist. Cancer. 2013;119:3472–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hunter S, Samir A, Eisner B, Gervais D, Maher M, Hahn P, et al. Diagnosis of renal lymphoma by percutaneous image guided biopsy: experience with 11 cases. J Urol. 2006;176:1952–6. discussion 1956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Na DG, Kim J, Sung JY, Baek JH, Jung KC, Lee H, et al. Core-needle biopsy is more useful than repeat fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules read as nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance by the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2012;22:468–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Simsek GG, Ertuğrul DT, Guresci S, Şimşek H. Is there a role for on-site evaluation of thyroid fine needle aspiration to reduce the nondiagnostic rate? Endocr Pathol. 2013;24:57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cermak TS, Wang B, DeBrito P, Carroll J, Haddad N, Sidawy MK. Does on-site adequacy evaluation reduce the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions? Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120:319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Virayavanich W, Ringler MD, Chin CT, Baum T, Giaconi JC, O’Donnell RJ, et al. CT-guided biopsy of bone and soft-tissue lesions: role of on-site immediate cytologic evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1024–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Salomao M, Remotti H, Allendorf JD, Poneros JM, Sethi A, Gonda TA, et al. Fine-needle aspirations of pancreatic serous cystadenomas: improving diagnostic yield with cell blocks and α-inhibin immunohistochemistry. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:33–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deonizio JMD, Guitart J. The role of molecular analysis in cutaneous lymphomas. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012;31:234–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Anderson MD, Abel TW, Moots PL. Re-evaluation of nondiagnostic biopsies of suspected low-grade glioma using isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation immunohistochemistry. Neuro-Oncology. 2013;15:811–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nielsen JA, Lager DJ, Lewin M, Weber JJ, Roberts CA. Incidence of diagnostic change in colorectal polyp specimens after deeper sectioning at 2 different laboratories staffed by the same pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140:231–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li QK, Nugent SL, Straseski J, Cooper D, Riedel S, Askin FB, et al. Thyroglobulin measurements in fine-needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes for the detection of metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:440–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR, Dershaw DD, Evans WP, Bassett L, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Source of funding

N/A

Compliance with ethical standards

N/A

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Yawkey 6E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Connie Y. Chang, Ambrose J. Huang, Miriam A. Bredella, Martin Torriani & Daniel I. Rosenthal

  2. Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Elkan F. Halpern

  3. Department of Orthopedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Dempsey S. Springfield

Authors
  1. Connie Y. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ambrose J. Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miriam A. Bredella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Torriani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elkan F. Halpern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniel I. Rosenthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dempsey S. Springfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Connie Y. Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, C.Y., Huang, A.J., Bredella, M.A. et al. Percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors: a 5-year analysis of non-diagnostic biopsies. Skeletal Radiol 44, 1795–1803 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2235-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2235-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation