Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Late diagnosis of a McFarland fracture: imaging and treatment

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 02 August 2013

Abstract

McFarland fractures represent a type of oblique medial malleolar fracture in children that can be challenging to diagnose and treat. A 14-year-old junior league soccer player with a Salter Harris type IV McFarland fracture presented late, as the initial routine two views radiological assessment failed to reveal a clear fracture line. The addition of a mortise ankle view led to the correct diagnosis and subsequent MRI findings guided nonsurgical treatment with an excellent outcome. The debate between obtaining two or three views in closed pediatric ankle injuries according to the so-called Ottawa rules and the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the decision making for the choice of treatment of McFarland fractures are discussed in this case report.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Kling Jr TF. Operative treatment of ankle fractures in children. Orthop Clin North Am. 1990;21(2):381–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McFarland B. Traumatic arrest of epiphyseal growth of the lower end of tibia. Br J Surg;1931:78–82

  3. Gleizes V, Glorion C, Langlais J, Pouliquen JC. McFarland fractures. A series of 24 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86(4):373–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Camilleri JP, Leroux J, Bourelle S, Vanel O, Cottalorda J. [Mc Farland fractures: a retrospective study of 26 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2005;91(6):551–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Duran JA, Dayer R, Kaelin A, Ceroni D. Intraoperative arthrography for the evaluation of closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of displaced McFarland fractures: an alternative to open surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(1):e1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackburn EW, Aronsson DD, Rubright JH, Lisle JW. Ankle fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(13):1234–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottalorda J, Béranger V, Louahem D, Camilleri JP, Launay F, Diméglio A, et al. Salter-Harris Type III and IV medial malleolar fractures: growth arrest: is it a fate? A retrospective study of 48 cases with open reduction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28:652–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark KD, Tanner S. Evaluation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003;19(2):73–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dowling SK, Wishart I. Use of the Ottawa ankle rules in children: a survey of physicians’ practice patterns. CJEM. 2011;13(5):333–8. E44–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tandeter HB, Shvartzman P. Acute ankle injuries: clinical decision rules for radiographs. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55(8):2721–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wallis MG. Are three views necessary to examine acute ankle injuries? Clin Radiol. 1990;41(3):218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Letts RM. The hidden adolescent ankle fracture. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2(2):161–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hübner U, Schlicht W, Outzen S, Barthel M, Halsband H. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82(8):1170–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brandser EA, Berbaum KS, Dorfman DD, Braksiek RJ, El-Khoury GY, Saltzman CL, et al. Contribution of individual projections alone and in combination for radiographic detection of ankle fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(6):1691–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vargish T, Clarke WR, Young RA, Jensen A. The ankle injury–indications for the selective use of X-rays. Injury. 1983;14:507–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(4):384–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pigman EC, Klug RK, Sanford S, Jolly BT. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24(1):41–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boutis K, Schuh S. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55(4):391–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Myers A, Canty K, Nelson T. Are the Ottawa ankle rules helpful in ruling out the need for x ray examination in children? Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(12):1309–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dowling S, Spooner CH, Liang Y, Dryden DM, Friesen C, Klassen TP, et al. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and midfoot in children: a meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(4):277–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boutis K, Komar L, Jaramillo D, Babyn P, Alman B, Snyder B, et al. Sensitivity of a clinical examination to predict need for radiography in children with ankle injuries: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358(9299):2118–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petscavage J, Baker SR, Clarkin K, Luk L. Overuse of concomitant foot radiographic series in patients sustaining minor ankle injuries. Emerg Radiol. 2010;17(4):261–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cockshott WP, Jenkin JK, Pui M. Limiting the use of routine radiography for acute ankle injuries. Can Med Assoc J. 1983;129:129–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vangsness Jr CT, Carter V, Hunt T, Kerr R, Newton E. Radiographic diagnosis of ankle fractures: are three views necessary? Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:172–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brage ME, Rockett M, Vraney R, Anderson R, Toledano A. Ankle fracture classification: a comparison of reliability of three X-ray views versus two. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(8):555–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Devalentine SJ. Epiphyseal injuries of the foot and ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1987;4(1):279–310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. De Sanctis N, Della Corte S, Pempinello C. Distal tibial and fibular epiphyseal fractures in children: prognostic criteria and long-term results in 158 patients. J Pediatr Orthop Part B. 2000;9:40Y44.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mouterde P, Rigault P, Padovani JP, Finidori G. [Traumatic injuries of the epiphyseal plate in the lower extremity of the tibia]. Chir Pediatr. 1979;20(2):115–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nenopoulos SP, Papavasiliou VA, Papavasiliou AV. Outcome of physeal and epiphyseal injuries of the distal tibia with intra-articular involvement. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25(4):518–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Ath Konstantinidis.

Additional information

Level of evidence V

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Symeonidis, P.D., Konstantinidis, G.A., Dionellis, P.S. et al. Late diagnosis of a McFarland fracture: imaging and treatment. Skeletal Radiol 43, 65–69 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1680-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1680-x

Keywords

Navigation