Detection of partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: is a single direct MR arthrography series in ABER position as accurate as conventional MR arthrography?
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate sensitivity and specificity of a single magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography series in abduction external rotation (ABER) position compared with conventional MR arthrography for detection of supraspinatus tendon tears, with arthroscopy as gold standard, and to assess interobserver variability.
Materials and methods
Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent was waived. MR arthrograms of 250 patients (170 men and 80 women; mean age, 36 years) were retrospectively and independently evaluated by three observers. Oblique coronal T1-weighted fat-suppressed images, proton density, and T2-weighted images and axial T1-weighted images and oblique sagittal T1-weighted fat-suppressed images were analyzed to detect supraspinatus tendon tears. Separately, a single T1-weighted fat-suppressed oblique axial series in ABER position was evaluated. Both protocols were scored randomly without knowledge of patients' clinical history and arthroscopy results. Tears were subclassified, based on articular surface integrity and extension (Lee classification). Interobserver agreement was assessed by kappa statistics for all patients. Ninety-two of 250 patients underwent arthroscopy; sensitivity and specificity of ABER and conventional MR arthrography were calculated and compared using paired McNemar test.
Weighted kappa values of ABER and conventional MR arthrography were 0.48–0.65 and 0.60–0.67, respectively. According to arthroscopy, 69 of 92 patients had an intact cuff, and 23 patients had a cuff tear (16 partial thickness and seven full thickness). There were no statistically significant differences between ABER and conventional MR arthrography regarding sensitivity (48–61% and 52–70%, respectively) and specificity (80–94% and 91–95%).
Sensitivity and specificity of a single T1-weighted series in ABER position and conventional MR arthrography are comparable for assessment of rotator cuff tears.
- van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54(12): 959–964. CrossRef
- Codman EA, Akerson ID. The pathology associated with rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. Ann Surg. 1931; 93: 348. CrossRef
- Ogata S, Uhthoff HK. Acromial enthesopathy and rotator cuff tear: a radiologic and histologic postmortem investigation of the coracoacromial arch. Clin Orthop. 1990; 254: 39–48.
- Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW. The morphology of the acromion and the rotator cuff: importance. Orthop Trans. 1986; 10: 228.
- Soslowsky LJ, Carpenter JE, Bucchieri JS, Flatow EL. Biomechanics of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997; 28: 17–30. CrossRef
- Meister K. Injuries to the shoulder in the throwing athlete. Part I: Biomechanics/pathophysiology/classify-cation of injury. Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 265–275.
- Yamaguchi K, Ditsios K, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Galatz LM, Teefey SA. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease—a comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2006; 88: 1699–1704. CrossRef
- Stetson WB, Phillips T, Deutsch A. The use of magnetic resonance arthrography to detect partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jnt Surg Am. 2005; 87: 81–88. CrossRef
- Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Nakagawa Y, Masuhara K, Tamai S. Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1988; 70(8): 1224–1230.
- Budoff JE, Nirschl RP, Guidi EJ. Débridement of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff without acromioplasty. Long-term follow-up and review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1998; 80(5): 733–748.
- Razmjou H, Holtby R, Aarabi M. Partial and full-thickness rotator cuff tears: range of motion comparison. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2008; 90-B: 140.
- Ellman H. Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop. 1990; 254: 64–74.
- Lee SY, Lee JK. Horizontal component of partial-thickness tears of rotator cuff: imaging characteristics and comparison of ABER view with oblique coronal view at MR arthrography—initial results. Radiology. 2002; 224: 470–476. CrossRef
- Waldt S, Bruegel M, Mueller D, et al. Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(2): 491–498. CrossRef
- Ferrari FS, Governi S, Burresi F, Vigni F, Stefani P. Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12(5): 1211–1217. CrossRef
- Tirman PF, Bost FW, Steinbach LS, et al. MR arthrographic depiction of tears of the rotator cuff benefit of abduction and external rotation of the arm. Radiology. 1994; 192: 851–856.
- Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session: MR arthrography. RadioGraphics. 2002; 22(5): 1223–1246.
- Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA, Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004; 86: 708–716.
- Martín-Hervás C, Romero J, Navas-Acien A, Reboiras JJ, Munuera L. Ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images of rotator cuff lesions compared with arthroscopy or open surgery findings. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10(5): 410–415. CrossRef
- Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, Cervilla V, Karzel RP, Schweitzer ME. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology. 1992; 182(2): 431–436.
- Read JW, Perko M. Shoulder ultrasound: diagnostic accuracy for impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, and biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 7(3): 264–271. CrossRef
- Robertson PL, Schweitzer ME, Mitchell DG, et al. Rotator cuff disorders: interobserver and intraobserver variation in diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995; 194: 831–835.
- Balich SM, Sheley RC, Brown TR, Sauser DD, Quinn SF. MR imaging of the rotator cuff tendon: interobserver agreement and analysis of interpretive errors. Radiology. 1997; 204: 191–194.
- Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon. Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187: 881–886. CrossRef
- Ianotti JP, Ciccone J, Buss DD, et al. Accuracy of office-based ultrasonography of the shoulder for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005; 87(6): 1305–1311. CrossRef
- Jacobson JA, Lancaster S, Prasad A, van Holsbeeck MT, Craig JG, Kolowich P. Full-thickness and partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: value of US signs in diagnosis. Radiology. 2004; 230: 234–242. CrossRef
- Brenneke SL, Morgan CJ. Evaluation of ultrasonography as a diagnostic technique in the assessment of rotator cuff tendon tears. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 287–289. CrossRef
- Milosavljevic J, Elvin A, Rahme H. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison with arthroscopy in one-hundred-and-ninety consecutive cases. Acta Radiol. 2005; 46(8): 858–865. CrossRef
- Flannigan B, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder S, Karzel R, Del Pizzo W, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990; 155: 829–832.
- Vlychou M, Dailiana Z, Fotiadou A, Papanagiotou M, Fezoulidis IV, Malizos K. Symptomatic partial rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging with surgical correlation. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50(1): 101–105. CrossRef
- Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Yamaguchi K. Sonography of the rotator cuff: analysis of interobserver variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183: 1465–1468.
- Tirman PF, Palmer WE, Feller JF. MR arthrography of the shoulder. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1997; 5: 811–839.
- Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Rotator cuff: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR arthrography. Radiology. 1993; 188: 683–687.
- Magee T. 3-T MRI of the shoulder: is MR arthrography necessary? Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 86–92. CrossRef
- Meister K, Thesing J, Montgomery WJ, Indelicato PA, Walczak S, Fontenot W. MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation. Skelet Radiol. 2004; 33(3): 136–141. CrossRef
- Yagci B, Manisali M, Yilmaz E, Ozkan M, Ekin A, Ozaksoy D, et al. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder in detection of rotator cuff ruptures. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11(2): 258–262. CrossRef
- Oh DK, Yoon YC, Kwon JW, et al. Comparison of indirect isotropic MR arthrography and conventional MR arthrography of labral lesions and rotator cuff tears: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192(2): 473–479. CrossRef
- Jung JY, Yoon YC, Yi SK, Yoo J, Choe BK. Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol. 2009 (in press).
- Herold T, Bachthaler M, Hamer OW, et al. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder: use of abduction and external rotation to detect full- and partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon. Radiology. 2006; 240(1): 152–160. CrossRef
- Schreinemachers SA, Hulst van der VPM, Willems WJ, Bipat S, Woude van der HJ. Is a single DIRECT MR arthrography series in ABER position as accurate in detecting anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions as conventional MR arthography? Skeletal Radiol 2009 (in press).
- Huijsmans PE, Haen PS, Kidd M, Dhert WJ, van der Hulst VP, Willems WJ. Quantification of a glenoid defect with three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(6): 803–809. CrossRef
- Detection of partial-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears: is a single direct MR arthrography series in ABER position as accurate as conventional MR arthrography?
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 38, Issue 10 , pp 967-975
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Shoulder joint
- Magnetic resonance imaging
- Rotator cuff
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Oosterpark 9, Postbus 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 4. Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Oosterpark 9, Postbus 95500, 1090, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 2. Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Oosterpark 9, Postbus 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 3. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands