Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the oasis landscape fragmentation in northwestern China by using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study of Jinta oasis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Geology

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the oasis landscape fragmentation in northwestern China’s arid regions. Landscape maps of Jinta oasis were compiled by using GIS based on Landsat TM data of 1990 and 2000. Landscape indexes for evaluating fragmentation are patch area, patch density, corridor density and split index. Results indicated many difference. First, between the years 1990 and 2000, the landscape fragmentation in Jinta oasis decreased slightly. Second, the area of the matrix decreased at the class level. The landscape fragmentation of the matrix (bare soil) increased as a result of increased influence of human activities on matrix and was opposite to the irrigated farmland whose area is larger and more aggregated in 2000 than in 1990. Third, dense corridor system is one of the most prominent characteristics of the arid regions. It is one of the key factors resulting in the landscape fragmentation; especially the fragmentation within the same patch types. The corridor density of irrigated farmland, residential area and forestland were quite large in Jinta oasis both in 1990 and 2000. The pattern of Jinta oasis is characterized by agricultural oasis embedded in Gobi and in the desert, where the ecosystem was disturbed strongly by the intense human activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bu RC, Hu YM, Chang Y, Li XZ, He HS (2005) A correlation analysis on landscape metrics. Acta Ecol Sin 25:2764–2775

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante R, Castor C (1998) The decline of an endangered temperate ecosystem: the ruil (Nothofagus alessandrii) forest in Central Chile. Biodivers Conserv 7:1607–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cale PG (2003) The influence of social behaviour, dispersal and landscape fragmentation on population structure in a sedentary bird. Biol Conserv 109:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsjens GJ, van Lier HN (2002) Fragmentation and land-use planning, an introduction. Landsc Urban Plan 58:79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LD, Fu BJ (1996) Analysis of impact of human activity on landscape structure in Yellow River delta—case study of Dongyng region. Acta Ecol Sin 16:337–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinge SK (1996) Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landsc Urban Plan 36:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO (2006) Plant species richness in midfield islets and road verges—the effect of landscape fragmentation. Biol Conserv 127:500–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverria C, Coomes D, Salas J, Rey-Benayas JM, Lara A, Newton A (2006) Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean Temperate Forests. Biol Conserv 130:481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manage 61(3):603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscape and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York, p 620

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecol Appl 3:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohn RC (1998) Remote sensing for landscape ecology: new metric indicators for monitoring, modeling, and assessment of ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Florida, p 99

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Abraham CE, Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Hawbaker TJ, Stewart SI, Clayton MK (2006) Building patterns and landscape fragmentation in northern Wisconsin, USA. Dig Landsc Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9016-z

  • Guerschman JP, Paruelo JM (2005) Agricultural impacts on ecosystem function in temperate areas of North and South America. Glob Planet Change 47:170–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, O’Nell RV, Coleman PR (1987) Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48:321–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351

  • McGarigal K, McComb WC (1999) Forest fragmentation effects on breeding bird communities in the Oregon Coast Range. In: Rochelle JA, Lehmann LA, Wisniewski J (eds) Forest fragmenation: wildlife and management implications. Brill, New York, pp 223–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Munroe DK, Southworth J (2004) From pattern to process: landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, Krummel JR, Gardner RH, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis DL, Milne BT, Turner MG, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH, Graham RL (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochelle JA (1999) Appendix. Forest fragmentation: wildlife and management implications. Brill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Richardson DM, Cowling RM (2003) The current configuration of protected areas in the Cape Floristic region, South Africa—reservations bias and representation of biodiversity patterns and processes. Biol Conserv 112:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Hassas NM, Sargent S, Orrrock JL, Weldon A, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff J, Damschen EI, Townsend P (2002) Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. PANS 99:12923–12926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald MD, Miller JR, Hobbs NT, Miller RJ, Thompson HN (1997) Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Landsc Urban Plan 39:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner IM (1996) Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the evidence. J Appl Ecol 33:200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Sys 20:171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH (1991) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer, New York, p 536

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermaat JE, Rollon RN, Lacap CDA, Billot C, Alberto F, Nacorda HME, Wiegman F, Terrados J (2004) Meadow fragmentation and reproductive output of the SE Asian seagrass Enhaluc acoroides. J Sea Res 52:321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PFM, Ter Braak CJF (2000) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat 183:24–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Zhao Y, Han D (1999) The spatial structure of landscape eco-systems: concept, indices and case study. Adv Earth Sci 14:235–241 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB (2000) Forest fragmentation as an economic indicator. Landsc Ecol 15:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With K, Crist T (1995) Critical thresholds in species’ responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76:2446–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu XB, Thurow TL, Whisenant SG (2000) Fragmentation and changes in hydrologic function of tiger bush landscapes, southwest Niger. J Ecol 88:790–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen V (1993) Remote sensing and GIS for geologic hazard mitigation. ITC J 4:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao D (1991) The metric system and study method of landscape structure. In: Xiao D (ed) Theory, method and application of landscape ecology, pp 92–98. Forestry Press of China, Beijing, p 318 (in Chinese)

  • Zebisch M, Wechsung F, Kenneweg H (2003) Landscape response functions for biodiversity—assessing the impact of land-use change at the county level. Landsc Urban Plan 1015:1–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant number: 2003102), and CAS International Partnership Project “The Basic Research for Water Issues of Inland River Basin in Arid Region” (CXTD-Z2005-2). The authors thank the editors for their hard work and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo Ming.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ming, G., Wenbing, Y., Mingguo, M. et al. Study on the oasis landscape fragmentation in northwestern China by using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study of Jinta oasis. Environ Geol 54, 629–636 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0830-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0830-7

Keywords

Navigation