Date: 15 Jul 2010
Viable Real-Time PCR in Environmental Samples: Can All Data Be Interpreted Directly?
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Selective nucleic acid intercalating dyes—ethidium monoazide (EMA) and propidium monoazide (PMA)—represent one of the most successful recent approaches to detect viable cells (as defined by an intact cell membrane) by PCR and have been effectively evaluated in different microorganisms. However, some practical limitations were found, especially in environmental samples. The aim of this work was to show that in the application of viable real-time PCR, there may be significant biases and to propose a strategy for overcoming some of these problems. We present an approach based on the combination of three real-time PCR amplifications for each sample that should provide an improved estimation of the number of viable cells. This approach could be useful especially when it is difficult to determine a priori how to optimize methods using PMA or EMA. Although further studies are required to improve viable real-time PCR methods, the concept as outlined here presents an interesting future research direction.
AFNOR XP T90-471 (2006) Détection et quantification des Legionella et/ou Legionella pneumophila par concentration et amplification génique par reaction de polymérisation en chaîne (PCR). Normalization Française
Bolton PH, Kearns DR (1978) Spectroscopic properties of ethidium monoazide: a fluorescent photoaffinity label for nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 5:4981–4903CrossRef
Chang B, Taguri T, Sugiyama K, Amemura-Maekawa J, Kura F, Watanabe H (2010) Comparison of ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide for the selective detection of viable Legionella cells. Jpn J Infect Dis 63:119–123PubMed
Kralik P, Nocker A, Pavlik I (2010) Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis viability determination using F57 quantitative PCR in combination with propidium monoazide treatment. Int J Food Microbiol. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.018
Nocker A, Cheung CY, Camper AK (2006) Comparison of propidium monoazide and ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. J Microbiol Meth 67:310–320CrossRef
Nogva HK, Dromtorp SM, Nissen H, Rudi K (2003) Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5′-nuclease PCR. Biotechniques 810:812–813
Rasmussen R (2001) Quantification on the LightCycler. In: Meuer S, Wittwer C, Nakagawara K (eds) Rapid cycle real-time PCR, methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 21–34
Soejima T, Iida K, Qin T, Taniai H, Seki M, Takade A, Yoshida S (2007) Photoactivated ethidium monoazide directly cleaves bacterial DNA and is applied to PCR for discrimination of live and dead bacteria. Microbiol Immunol 51:763–775PubMed
- Viable Real-Time PCR in Environmental Samples: Can All Data Be Interpreted Directly?
Volume 61, Issue 1 , pp 7-12
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Laboratori de Microbiologia Sanitària i Mediambiental (MSMLab)-Aquasost, UNESCO Chair in Sustainability, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, C/Violinista Vellsolà 37, 08222, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
- 2. Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, 366 EPS Building, Bozeman, MT, USA