Abstract
Background
MR Urography (MRU) is an increasingly used imaging modality for the evaluation of pediatric genitourinary obstruction.
Objective
To determine whether pediatric MR urography (MRU) reliably detects crossing vessels in the setting of suspected ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. The clinical significance of these vessels was also evaluated.
Materials and methods
We identified pediatric patients diagnosed with UPJ obstruction by MRU between May 2009 and June 2014. MRU studies were evaluated by two pediatric radiologists for the presence or absence of crossing vessels. Ancillary imaging findings such as laterality, parenchymal thinning/scarring, trapped fluid in the proximal ureter, and presence of renal parenchymal edema were also evaluated. Imaging findings were compared to surgical findings. We used the Mann–Whitney U test to compare continuous data and the Fisher exact test to compare proportions.
Results
Twenty-four of 25 (96%) UPJ obstructions identified by MRU were surgically confirmed. MRU identified crossing vessels in 10 of these cases, with 9 cases confirmed intraoperatively (κ = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.75, 1.0]). Crossing vessels were determined to be the primary cause of UPJ obstruction in 7/9 children intraoperatively, while in two children the vessels were deemed incidental and noncontributory to the urinary tract obstruction. There was no significant difference in age or the proportions of ancillary findings when comparing children without and with obstructing vessels.
Conclusion
MRU allows detection of crossing vessels in pediatric UPJ obstruction. Although these vessels are the primary cause of obstruction in some children, they are incidental and non-contributory in others. Our study failed to convincingly identify any significant predictors (e.g., age or presence of renal parenchymal edema) that indicate when a crossing vessel is the primary cause of obstruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woodward M, Frank D (2002) Postnatal management of antenatal hydronephrosis. BJU Int 89:149–156
Flake AW, Harrison MR, Sauer L et al (1986) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the fetus. J Pediatr Surg 21:1058–1063
Lowe FC, Marshall FF (1984) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology 23:331–335
Park JM, Bloom DA (1998) The pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction. Current concepts. Urol Clin North Am 25:161–169
Zhang PL, Peters CA, Rosen S (2000) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: morphological and clinical studies. Pediatr Nephrol 14:820–826
Cusano A, Abarzua-Cabezas F, Kesler S (2014) Fibroepithelial ureteral polyps presenting as ureteropelvic obstruction. BMJ Case Rep. doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-204565
Hoffer FA, Lebowitz RL (1985) Intermittent hydronephrosis: a unique feature of ureteropelvic junction obstruction caused by a crossing renal vessel. Radiology 156:655–658
Rooks VJ, Lebowitz RL (2001) Extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction from a crossing renal vessel: demography and imaging. Pediatr Radiol 31:120–124
Quillin SP, Brink JA, Heiken JP et al (1996) Helical (spiral) CT angiography for identification of crossing vessels at the ureteropelvic junction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1125–1130
Lawler LP, Jarret TW, Corl FM et al (2005) Adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction: insights with three-dimensional multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 25:121–134
Grattan-Smith JD, Little SB, Jones RA (2008) MR urography evaluation of obstructive uropathy. Pediatr Radiol 38:S49–S69
Grattan-Smith JD, Jones RA (2008) MR urography: technique and results for the evaluation of urinary obstruction in pediatric population. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:643–660
Darge K, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D (2011) MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in infants, children, and adolescents. Radiology 261:12–29
Van Cangh PJ, Nesa S, Galeon M et al (1996) Vessels around the ureteroplevic junction: significance and imaging by conventional radiology. J Endourol 10:111–119
Streem SB, Geisinger MA (1995) Prevention and management of hemorrhage associated with cautery wire balloon incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 153:1904–1906
Tan BJ, Smith AD (2004) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what? Curr Opin Urol 14:55–59
Chen RN, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1998) Laparascopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and long-term outcome. Urol Clin North Am 25:323–330
Veyrac C, Baud C, Lopez C et al (2003) The value of colour Doppler ultrasonography for identification of crossing vessels in children with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Pediatr Radiol 33:745–751
Rigas A, Karamanolakis D, Bogdanos I et al (2003) Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction by crossing renal vessels: clinical and imaging features. BJU Int 92:101–103
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parikh, K.R., Hammer, M.R., Kraft, K.H. et al. Pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: can magnetic resonance urography identify crossing vessels?. Pediatr Radiol 45, 1788–1795 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3412-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3412-y