Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Affecting Distribution of Estrogenicity in the Influents, Effluents, and Biosolids of Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plants

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Canadian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) release significant amounts of estrogenic chemicals to nearby surface waters. Environmental estrogens have been implicated as the causative agents of many developmental and reproductive problems in animals, including fish. The goals of this study were to assess the estrogenic activity in the influents, effluents, and biosolids of thirteen Canadian WWTPs using the yeast estrogen screen (YES) bioassay and to investigate whether factors, such as wastewater treatment method, sample storage, extraction efficiency, population, and summer/winter temperature had any effects on the distribution of estrogenicity in the WWTPs. Results of the study showed that estrogenicity from the influent to the effluent decreased in seven WWTPs, increased in two WWTPs, and did not change in four WWTPs during the winter. Estrogenic concentrations generally decreased in the order of biosolids > influents > effluents and ranged from 1.57 to 24.6, 1.25E−02 to 3.84E−01, and 9.46E−03 to 3.90E−01 ng estradiol equivalents/g or ml, respectively. The estrogenicity in the final effluents, but not those in the influents and biosolids, was significantly higher in the summer than the winter. Among the WWTP treatment methods, advanced, biological nutrient removal appeared to be the most effective method to remove estrogenic chemicals from wastewaters in Canada. Our studies help to identify factors or mechanisms that affect the distribution of estrogenicity in WWTPs, providing a better understanding on the discharges of estrogenic chemicals from WWTPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerni HR, Kobler B, Rutishhauser BV, Wettstein FE, Fischer R, Giger W, Hungerbuhler A, Marazuela MD, Peter A, Schonenberger R, Vogeli AC, Sutter MJ, Eggen RI (2004) Combined biological and chemical assessment of estrogenic activities in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Anal Bioanal Chem 378:688–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balsiger HA, De La Torre R, Lee W-Y, Cox MM (2010) A four-hour yeast bioassay for the direct measure of estrogenic activity in wastewater without sample extraction, concentration, or sterilization. Sci Total Environ 408(6):1422–1429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergh K, van Roodselaar A, Law F (2009) Ecological risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in surface waters. In: Theophanides M, Theophanides T (eds) Environmental engineering and management. Athens Institute for Education and Research, Athens, Greece, pp 257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Bistan M, Logar R, Tisler T (2011) Detection of estrogenic activity in Slovenian wastewaters by bioassay. Cent Eur J Biol 6:829–837

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd G, Palmeri J, Zhang S, Grimm D (2004) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in stormwater canals and Bayou St. John in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Sci Total Environ 333:137–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cicek N, Londry K, Oleszkiewicz JA, Wong D, Lee Y (2007) Removal of selected natural and synthetic estrogenic compounds in a Canadian full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Environ Res 79(7):795–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ascenzo G, Di Corcia A, Gentili A, Mancini R, Mastropasqua R, Nazzari M, Samperi R (2003) Fate of natural estrogen conjugates in municipal sewage transport and treatment facilities. Sci Total Environ 302:199–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2010) Water pollution. Pollution entering Canadian waters. http://www.ec.gc.ca/eu-ww/default.asp?lang=En&n=BC799641-1. Accessed 15 Oct 2013

  • Fawell JK, Sheahan D, James HA, Hurst M, Scott S (2001) Oestrogens and oestrogenic activity in raw and treated water in Seven Trent Water. Water Res 35:1240–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez MP, Ikonomou MG, Buchanan I (2007) An assessment of estrogenic organic contaminants in Canadian wastewaters. Sci Total Environ 373:250–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez MP, Buchanan ID, Ikonomou MG (2008) Seasonal variability of the reduction in estrogenic activity at a municipal WWTP. Water Res 42:3075–3081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaido KW, Leonard LS, Lovel S, Gould JC, Babai D, Porter CJ, McDonnell DP (1997) Evaluation of chemicals with endocrine modulating activity in yeast-based steroid hormone receptor gene transcription assay. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 143:205–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PC, Holmes P, Humfrey CN (1997) Reproductive health in humans and wildlife: are adverse trends associated with environmental chemical exposure? Sci Total Environ 205:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CH, Sedlak DL (2001) Analysis of estrogenic hormones in municipal wastewater effluent and surface water using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AC, Williams RJ, Simpson P, Kanda R (2007) What difference might sewage treatment performance make to endocrine disruption in rivers? Environ Pollut 147:194–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanokkantapong V, Panyagpinyopol B, Wattanachira S, Wonguchoto P (2008) Influence of coagulation with alum and cationic polymers on the formation of THMs. In: The sixth PSU engineering conference. Thailand. Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, 90112

  • Kidd KA, Blanchfield PJ, Mills KH, Palace VP, Evans RE, Lazorchak JM, Flick RW (2007) Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:8897–8901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HB, Peart TE (1998) Determination of 17 beta-estradiol and its metabolites in sewage effluent by solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J AOAC Intl 81:1209–1217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YM, Oleszkiewicz JA, Cicek N, Londry K (2004) Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDC) in municipal wastewater treatment: a need for mass balance. Environ Technol 25:635–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Kanjo Y, Mizutani S (2009) Removal mechanisms for endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in waste water treatment - physical means, biodegradation and chemical advanced oxidation: a review. Sci Total Environ 407:731–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen A, Handel JG, Conn KL, Bittman S, Kwabiah AB, Lazarovitz G, Masse D, McAllister TA, Topp E (2004) Survey of hormone activities in municipal biosolids and animal manures. Environ Toxicol 19:216–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson J, Bishay F, van Roodselaar A, Ijonomou M, Law FCP (2007) The use of in vitro to quantify endocrine disrupting chemicals in municipal wastewater treatment plant effluents. Sci Total Environ 374:80–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski S, Ternes TA, Bonerz M, Ratstall AC, Erdinger L, Braunbeck T (2004) Estrogenicity of solid phase-extracted water samples from two municipal sewage treatment plant effluents and river Rhine water using the yeast estrogen screen. Toxicol In Vitro 18:129–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Routledge EJ, Sumpter JP (1996) Estrogenic activity of surfactants and some of their degradation products assessed using a recombinant yeast screen. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:241–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Servos MR, Bennie DT, Burnison BK, Jurkovic A, McInnis R, Neheli T, Schnell A, Seto P, Smyth SA, Ternes TA (2005) Distribution of estrogens, 17beta-estradiol and estrone, in Canadian municipal wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 336:155–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shokrollahzadeh S, Azizmohseni F, Golmohammad F, Shokouhi H, Khademhaghighat F (2008) Biodegradation potential and bacterial diversity of a petrochemical wastewater treatment plant in Iran. Bioresour Technol 99:6127–6133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soto AM, Sonnenschein C, Chung KL, Fernandez MF, Serrano FO (1995) The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants. Environ Health Perspect 103:113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa A, Nenberger S, Jonkers N, Suter M, Tanabe S (2010) Chemical and biological characterization of estrogenicity in effluent from WWTPs in Ria de Averio (NW Portugal). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ternes TA, Kreckel P, Mueller J (1999) Behaviour and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage plants. II. Aerobic batch experiments with activated sludge. Sci Total Environ 225:91–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilton F, Benson WH, Schlenk D (2002) Evaluation of estrogenic activity from a municipal wastewater treatment plant with predominantly domestic input. Aquat Toxicol 61:211–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verslycke T, Vandenbergh GF, Versonnen B, Arijs K, Janssen CR (2002) Induction of vitellogenesis in 17α-ethinylestradiol-exposed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): a method comparison. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C 132:483–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve DL, Blankenship AL, Giesy JP (2000) Derivation and application of elative potency estimates based on in vitro bioassay results. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2835–2843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang HP, Gao Z, Beres B, Ottobre J, Wallat G, Tiu L, Rapp D, O‘Bryant P, Yao H (2008) Effects of estradiol-17β on survival, growth performance, sex reversal and gonadal structure of bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus. Aquaculture 285:216–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff P (2003) Removal of endocrine disruptors, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products during water treatment. Southwest Hydrol 2(6):18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise A, O‘Brien K, Woodruff T (2011) Are oral contraceptives a significant contributor to the estrogenicity of drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 45:51–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wozei E, Hermanowicz SW (2006) Developing a yeast-based assay protocol to monitor total oestrogenic activity induced by 17β-oestradiol in activated sludge supernatants from batch experiments. Water Sa 32:345–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ying GG, Kookana RS, Kumar A, Mortimer M (2009) Occurrence and implications of estrogens and xenoestrogens in sewage effluents and receiving waters from South East Queensland. Sci Total Environ 407:5147–5155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a Metro Vancouver contract PO#0000115952. We thank Dr. Shirley Anne Smyth, Environmental Canada for her assistance in collecting WWTP samples across Canada and Mr. Robert Ng, Metro Vancouver for helpful discussion on wastewater treatment methods in Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis C. P. Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shieh, B.H.H., Louie, A. & Law, F.C.P. Factors Affecting Distribution of Estrogenicity in the Influents, Effluents, and Biosolids of Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 70, 682–691 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0230-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0230-z

Keywords

Navigation