Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy for urinary stone treatment in children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We reviewed our 6 years of experience with endoscopic holmium: yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy for treatment of urinary stones in different locations in 111 children. A retrospective review was performed on endoscopic holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy procedures performed to treat stones in children between March 2006 and March 2012. In total, 120 laser lithotripsy procedures were performed to treat 131 stones in 111 children (80 males and 31 females; age range, 11 months to 16 years; median age, 6 years). Stones were located in the kidney in 48 cases (36.7 %), ureter in 52 (39.7 %), bladder in 21 (16.0 %), and urethra in 10 (7.6 %). Stone size ranged from 4 to 30 mm (mean, 12.8 mm), and anesthesia duration was 10–170 min (mean, 56 min). Forty-four ureters required balloon dilation, and 61 double J stents were inserted. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 75 months (mean, 35 months). Complete stone clearance was achieved at the end of the procedure in 102 (91.9 %) patients (age < 7 years, 93.3 % vs. age ≥ 7 years, 90.2 %; p > 0.05). The success rate was 81.3 % for kidney stones (<10 mm, 90.9 % vs. ≥ 10 mm, 78.4 %; p > 0.05) and 100 % for the ureter, bladder, and urethral stones. Overall success rate with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was 100 %. No major complications were encountered during or after the procedures. These results confirm the effectiveness and safety of holmium laser lithotripsy for treating all urinary stone locations in children of all ages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curhan GC, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ (1994) Regional variation in nephrolithiasis incidence and prevalence among United States men. J Urol 151:838–841

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Iguchi M, Umekawa T, Katoh Y, Kohri K, Kurita T (1996) Prevalence of urolithiasis in Kaizuka city, Japan-an epidemiologic study of urinary stones. Int J Urol 3:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tefekli A, Tok A, Altunrende F, Barut M, Berberoglu Y, Muslumanoglu AY (2005) Life style and nutritional habits in cases with urinary stone disease. Turk Uroloji Dergisi 31:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akinci M, Esen T, Tellaloglu S (1991) Urinary stone disease in Turkey: an updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol 20:200–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tan AH, Al-Omar M, Denstedt JD, Razvi H (2005) Ureteroscopy for pediatric urolithiasis: an evolving first-line therapy. Urology 65:153–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Remzi D, Cakmak F, Erkan I (1980) A study on the urolithiasis incidence in Turkish school-age children. J Urol 123:608

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tellaloglu S, Ander H (1984) Stones in children. Turk J Pediatr 26:51–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Unsal A, Resorlu B (2011) Retrograde intrarenal surgery in infants and preschool-age children. J Pediatr Surg 46:2195–2199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Atar M, Bodakci MN, Sancaktutar AA, Penbegul N, Soylemez H, Bozkurt Y, Hatipoglu NK, Cakmakci S (2012) Comparison of pneumatic and laser lithotripsy in the treatment of pediatric ureteral stones. J Pediatr Urol. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.03.004

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dogan HS, Tekgul S, Akdogan B, Keskin MS, Sahin A (2004) Use of the holmium: YAG laser for ureterolithotripsy in children. BJU Int 94:131–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Assmy A, Hafez AT, Eraky I, El-Nahas AR, El-Kappany HA (2006) Safety and outcome of rigid ureteroscopy for management of ureteral calculi in children. J Endourol 20:252–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Minevich E, Sheldon CA (2006) The role of ureteroscopy in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol 16:295–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sofer M, Binyamini J, Ekstein PM, Bar-Yosef Y, Chen J, Matzkin H, Ben-Chaim J (2007) Holmium laser ureteroscopic treatment of various pathologic features in pediatrics. Urology 69:566–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Unsal A, Resorlu B, Kara C, Bozkurt OF, Ozyuvali E (2010) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants, preschool age, and older children with different size of instruments. Urology 76:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, Adams MC, Brock JW 3rd, Pope JC 4th (2005) Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management. J Urol 174:1072–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, Traxer O (2010) Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/Urolithiasis%202010.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2012

  17. Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N et al (2011) Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. J Urol 186:1035–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Desai MR, Sharma R, Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Stief C, Bader M (2011) Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report. J Urol 186:140–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sung YM, Choo SW, Jeon SS, Shin SW, Park KB, Do YS (2006) The “mini-perc” technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with a 14-Fr peel-away sheath: 3-year results in 72 patients. Korean J Radiol 7:50–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schuster TG, Russell KY, Bloom DA, Koo HP, Faerber GJ (2002) Ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis in children. J Urol 167:1813–1816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Busaidy SS, Prem AR, Medhat M, Al-Bulushi YH (2004) Ureteric calculi in children: preliminary experience with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. BJU Int 93:1318–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lesani OA, Palmer JS (2006) Retrograde proximal rigid ureteroscopy and pyeloscopy in prepubertal children: safe and effective. J Urol 176:1570–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Manohar T, Ganpule AP, Shrivastav P, Desai M (2006) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex caliceal calculi and staghorn stones in children less than 5 years of age. J Endourol 20:547–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen S, Zhu L, Yang S, Wu W, Liao L, Tan J (2012) High- vs low-power holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective, randomized study in patients undergoing multitract minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 79:293–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Walther S, Weidlich P, Staehler M, Seitz M, Sroka R, Reich O, Stief CG, Schlenker B (2010) Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm. Urol Res 38:397–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S (2009) Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol 23:1395–1398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Teichman JM, Rogenes VJ, McIver BJ, Harris JM (1997) Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser cystolithotripsy of large bladder calculi. Urology 50:44–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial disclosures relevant to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibrahim Uygun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uygun, I., Okur, M.H., Aydogdu, B. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic laser lithotripsy for urinary stone treatment in children. Urol Res 40, 751–755 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0495-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0495-x

Keywords

Navigation