Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contralateral sensitive cross flap for reconstruction of a burned breast

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several different approaches for reconstruction have been already described taking into account size and shape of the native breast, location and type of cancer, whether adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy is needed, patient’s demographic information, and surgeon’s preferences and experience. We report a case of reconstruction in burn patient using a breast sensitive perforator flap from the contralateral side. Thanks to the volume excess, the left side was large enough to reconstruct the affected side. A supero-medial pedicled reduction mammaplasty was performed on the left breast, and the excess inferior-part was elevated laterally and caudally off the pectoralis major. The flap was supplied by two perforators from the internal mammary vessels, and it was transposed to the right side after resection of the burned breast tissue. The right nipple-areola complex was left buried under the flap. After 2 months, the flap pedicle was deepithelialized, debulked, and passed through inframammary fold. The nipple-areola complex was released as a pedicled flap and sutured to the flap tissue approximately at the same level of the contralateral from the sternal notch. Preoperative sensitivity assessment demonstrated worst sensation of the right breast compared to the uninjured side. At 6 months, postoperatively, the patient could localize pressure and sensibility tested by the use of cotton wool and a pinprick test was quite normal. A clear improvement was observed in cutaneous pressure sensation thresholds over the time. At 12 months, she could recognize cotton wool and a pinprick. No changes were observed in the nipple-areola complex sensibility.

Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duformentel L (1939) Chirurgie Re’paratrice et Corrective. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pontes R (1973) Single stage reconstruction of the missing breast. Br JPlast Surg 26:377–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer HF, de Belaustegui EA, Loustau HD (2016) The contralateral breast flap in autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:876–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Novo-Torres A, Fakih I, Aparicio-Alcazar JJ, Garcia-Juarranz J, Navarro-Sempere L, Lorda-Barraguer E (2015) Breast sharing: new perspectives on an old method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:1727–1732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall DR, Anstee EJ, Stapleton MJ (1981) Post mastectomy breast reconstruction using a breast sharing technique. Br J Plast Surg 34:426–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dellon AL (2000) Somatosensory testing and rehabilitation. Institute for Peripheral Nerve Surgery, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA (2000) Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstruct Surg 106:769–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS et al (2011) Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstruct Surg 127:1417–1424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tykka E, Asko-Seljavaara S, Hietanen H (2002) Patient satisfaction with delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective study. An Plast Surg 49:258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC et al (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstruct Surg 106:1014–1025 discussion 26-27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall DR, Anstee EJ, Stapleton MJ (1986) Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: the soft tissue alternative. Aust N Z J Surg 56:387–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marshall DR (1993) The contralateral breast flap in reconstruction of the breast and chest wall. Ann Plast Surg 31:508–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoeller T, Bauer T, Haug M, Otto A, Wechselberger G, Piza-Katzer H (2001) A new contralateral split-breast flap for breast reconstruction and its salvage after complication: an alternative for select patients. Ann Plast Surg 47:442–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosaria Laporta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Alessio Caggiati, Stefania Tenna, Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo and Rosaria Laporta declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this kind of article formal consent is not required.

Patient consent

Patient provided written consent before her inclusion in this study.

Funding

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caggiati, A., Tenna, S., Santanelli di Pompeo, F. et al. Contralateral sensitive cross flap for reconstruction of a burned breast. Eur J Plast Surg 40, 347–350 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1287-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1287-x

Keywords

Navigation