Abstract
Background
The risk of malignant transformation is the most important reason for melanocytic naevi excision whereas the most common reason for excision is cosmetic disturbance.
Methods
Our study was conducted in a retrospective design from June 2009 to October 2013 involving 790 naevi excisions from 509 patients (332 male, 177 female) due to cosmetic disturbance. Each patient was evaluated for age and gender in addition to the clinical characteristics of the lesions such as location, size, depth and morphology.
Results
The average age of our patient group was 36.4 (18–68). Of the 509 patients, 332 were female (65.2 %) and 177 were male (34.7 %). Intradermal naevus was the most common type. Of all patients, 93.3 % had intradermal, dysplastic or compound naevi. Of all lesions, 93.9 % were intradermal, dysplastic or compound naevi. Buccal region was the most common excision site in the face with 112 excisions. Female gender was dominant in all naevi types except for dysplastic naevi and junctional naevi. Male gender was dominant in these groups.
Conclusions
Gender and age in addition to the clinical characteristics of the lesion such as location, size, depth and morphology were analysed for each patient. To our knowledge, our study has the largest naevi excision number performed for only cosmetic reasons. Even though there was no malignant melanoma identified, high rate of dysplastic naevi was an important data due to its malignancy risk.
Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fitzpatrick TB, Freedberg IM (2003) Benign hyperplasias and neoplasias of melanocytes. In: Grichnic J, Rhodes A, Sober A (eds) Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine, vol 1, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub Division, New York, pp 881–905
Elder DE (2006) Precursors to melanoma and their mimics: nevi of special sites. Mod Pathol 19:S4–20
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, Pasquini P, Abeni D, Boyle P et al (2005) Meta analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. Eur J Cancer 41:28–44
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, Pasquini P, Picconi O, Boyle P et al (2005) Meta analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. Eur J Cancer 41:45–60
Dennis LK, White E, Lee JA, Kristal A et al (1996) Constitutional factors and sun exposure in relation to nevi: a population-based cross-sectional study. Am J Epidemiol 143:248–56
Pavlotsky F, Azizi E, Gurvich R, Lusky A et al (1997) Prevalence of melanocytic nevi and freckles in young Israeli males. Correlation with melanoma incidence in Jewish migrants: demographic and host factors. Am J Epidemiol 146:78–86
Williams ML, Sagebiel RW (1994) Melanoma risk factors and atypical moles. West J Med 160:343–50
Blessing K (1999) Benign atypical naevi: diagnostic difficulties and continued controversy. Histopathology 34:189–198
Hussein MR, Elsers DA, Fadel SA, Omar AE (2006) Clinicopathological features of melanocytic skin lesions in Egypt. Eur J Cancer Prev 15:64
Skender-Kalnenas TM, English DR, Heenan PJ (1995) Benign melanocytic lesions: risk markers or precursors of cutaneous melanoma? J Am Acad Dermatol 33:1000–7
Duffy K, Grossman D (2012) The dysplastic nevus: from historical perspective to management in the modern era. Part I. Historical, histologic and clinical aspects. J Am Acad Dermatol 67:1–16
Kang S, Barnhill RL, Mihm MC, Fitzpatrick TB, Sober AJ (1994) Melanoma risk in individuals with clinically atypical nevi. Arch Dermatol 130:999–1001
Conflict of Interest
None
Ethical standards
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ersen, B., Akin, S., Sahin, A. et al. Clinical and histopathological analysis of 790 naevi excised from 509 patients due to cosmetic reasons. Eur J Plast Surg 38, 133–138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-014-1041-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-014-1041-6