Dear Sir,
I was interested to read the paper by Correia de Verdier M and colleagues published in May 2016 issue of Neuroradiology [1]. The authors aimed to examine the reproducibility of phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI)-measured flow and velocity parameters in the intracranial arteries [1]. They measured the highest flow (HF), lowest flow (LF), peak systolic velocity (PSV), and end diastolic velocity (EDV) at two dates in the anterior (ACA), middle (MCA), and posterior (PCA) cerebral arteries of 30 healthy volunteers using two-dimensional PC-MRI at 3 T. The least detectable difference (LDD) was calculated [1].
It is crucial to know that, for reliability purposes, an individual-based approach instead of group based (mean) should be considered [2–5]. Therefore, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICCC) single measure instead of average measure should be reported to correctly assess the reliability.
As the authors pointed out in their conclusion, reproducibility is highest in MCA. Such a conclusion is a misleading message because in reliability analysis, group-based (average) approach is a methodological mistake and should be avoided by researcher; otherwise, misdiagnosis and mismanagement of the patients cannot be avoided.
References
Correia de Verdier M, Wikström J (2016) Normal ranges and test-retest reproducibility of flow and velocity parameters in intracranial arteries measured with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroradiology 58(5):521–31. doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1661-6
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2010) Modern Epidemiology, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Szklo M, Nieto FJ (2007) Epidemiology beyond the basics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publisher, Manhattan
Sabour S (2016) Reliability of a new modified tear breakup time method: methodological and statistical issues. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254(3):595–6. doi:10.1007/s00417-015-3138-4
Sabour S (2015) Spinal instability neoplastic scale: methodologic issues to avoid misinterpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(4):W493. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13870
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I declare that I have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
An author’s reply to this comment is available at 10.1007/s00234-016-1719-5
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabour, S. Reproducibility of flow and velocity parameters in intracranial arteries measured with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a methodological issue. Neuroradiology 58, 949 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1717-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1717-7