Skip to main content
Log in

The feasibility and efficacy of endovascular treatment for very small or tiny ruptured paraclinoid aneurysms

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endovascular treatment (EVT) for ruptured very small (≤5 mm) or tiny (≤3 mm) paraclinoid aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA).

Methods

From November 2009 to April 2012, 32 ruptured paraclinoid aneurysms (very small, 23; tiny, 9) in 31 patients received EVT. Angiographic follow-up determined occlusion rates which were classified as total/near-total (95–100 %), subtotal (80–95 %), and partial (<80 %) occlusions. Follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed and categorized using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

Results

Based on our paraclinoid aneurysm classification, 25 % (8) were classified as type I, 46.9 % (15) as type II, and 28.1 % (9) as type III. EVT was technically successful in 96.8 % (31), with coiling only in 12.5 % (4), balloon remolding coiling in 6.3 % (2), and stent-assisted coiling in 78.1 % (25). Total/near-total occlusion was immediately achieved in 34.4 % (11), subtotal occlusion in 37.5 % (12), and partial occlusion in 28.1 % (9). Follow-up angiography (mean, 9.9 ± 6.4 months) revealed total/near-total occlusion in 50 % (16) aneurysms, subtotal in 31.3 % (10), and partial occlusion in 18.8 % (6). At the end of clinical follow-up (mean, 14.8 ± 9.5 months), it revealed an mRS grade 0 in 38.7 % (12) of patients, grade 1 in 25.8 % (8), grade 2 in 22.6 % (7), grade 3 in 6.5 % (2), grade 4 in 3.2 % (1), and grade 5 in 3.2 % (1).

Conclusion

EVT is feasible and effective for ruptured very small or tiny paraclinoid aneurysms of the ICA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EVT:

Endovascular treatment

mRS:

Modified Rankin Scale

PComA:

Posterior communicating artery

ICA:

Internal carotid artery

SAH:

Subarachnoid hemorrhage

References

  1. De Jesús O, Sekhar LN, Riedel CJ (1999) Clinoid and paraclinoid aneurysms: surgical anatomy, operative techniques, and outcome. Surg Neurol 51:477–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Javalkar V, Banerjee AD, Nanda A (2011) Paraclinoid carotid aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 18:13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouthillier A, Loveren HR, Keller JT (1996) Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 38:425–433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li J, Lan ZG, Liu Y et al (2012) Large and giant ventral paraclinoid carotid aneurysms: surgical techniques, complications and outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.01.039

  5. Hoh BL, Carter BS, Budzik RF et al (2001) Results after surgical and endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms by a combined neurovascular team. Neurosurgery 48:78–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beretta F, Andaluz N, Zuccarello M (2004) Aneurysms of the ophthalmic (C6) segment of the internal carotid artery: treatment options and strategies based on a clinical series. J Neurosurg Sci 48:149–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raco A, Frati A, Santoro A et al (2008) Long-term surgical results with aneurysms involving the ophthalmic segment of the carotid artery. J Neurosurg 108:1200–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fulkerson DH, Horner TG, Payner TD et al (2009) Endovascular retrograde suction decompression as an adjunct to surgical treatment of ophthalmic aneurysms: analysis of risks and clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery 64(3 suppl):107–112

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loumiotis I, D'Urso PI, Tawk R et al (2012) Endovascular treatment of ruptured paraclinoid aneurysms: results, complications, and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogilvy CS, Natarajan SK, Jahshan S et al (2011) Stent-assisted coiling of paraclinoid aneurysms: risks and effectiveness. J Neurointerv Surg 3:14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barami K, Hernandez VS, Diaz FG et al (2003) Paraclinoid carotid aneurysms: surgical management, complications, and outcome based on a new classification scheme. Skull Base 13:31–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thines L, Bourgeois P, Lejeune JP (2012) Surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the ISAT and ISUIA era. Can J Neurol Sci 39:174–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin SC, Kwon do H, Ahn JS et al (2009) Clinical and radiogical outcomes of endovascular detachable coil embolization in paraclinoid aneurysms: a 10-year experience. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 45:5–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Park HK, Horowitz M, Jungreis C et al (2003) Endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms: experience with 73 patients. Neurosurgery 53:14–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thornton J, Aletich VA, Debrun GM et al (2000) Endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. Surg Neurol 54:288–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwon BJ, Im SH, Park JC (2010) Shaping and navigating methods of microcatheters for endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. Neurosurgery 67:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abe T, Hirohata M, Tanaka N et al (2004) Distal-tip shape-consistency testing of steam-shaped microcatheters suitable for cerebral aneurysm coil placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1058–1061

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R et al (2009) Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64:632–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I et al (2011) The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:34–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deutschmann HA, Wehrschuetz M, Augustin M et al (2012) Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: results from a single center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:481–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McAuliffe W, Wenderoth JD (2012) Immediate and midterm results following treatment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:487–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Min Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, J., Chen, XY., Jiang, DY. et al. The feasibility and efficacy of endovascular treatment for very small or tiny ruptured paraclinoid aneurysms. Neuroradiology 55, 77–83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1080-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1080-2

Keywords

Navigation