Abstract
Introduction
Acute stroke multimodal CT imaging (MMCT: non-enhanced CT, CT angiography, and CT perfusion (CTP)) may show normal results despite persistent clinical stroke. We prospectively evaluated the sensitivity/specificity of MMCT infarct detection and the clinical outcome in patients with normal MMCT findings.
Methods
From April 2007 to April 2008, all patients with acute hemispheric stroke within 6 h of symptom onset who underwent complete MMCT and MRI follow-up imaging were included. MMCT analysis included occlusion type, early infarct hypodensities (EIH), mean transit time (MTT), and cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps according to Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Clinical assessment included symptom onset to CT scan (≤3 h/>3 h), the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score (admission/discharge), and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) 90 days after stroke onset.
Results
One hundred seven were included (mean age, 68.4 years; ≤3 h, n = 84; >3 h, n = 23; intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), n = 51; ≤3 h, n = 40; >3 h, n = 11). In patients with normal MMCT on admission (n = 54), follow-up MRT detected brain infarctions in 23 patients (lacunar strokes, n = 16; infratentorial strokes, n = 4; territorial infarction, n = 3). Sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value of any infarct detection was 69.5%/99.8%/99.9%/57.2% and of a any territorial infarct detection was 93.9%/99.9%/99.9%/93.6%, respectively. In univariate regression analysis (time to CT scan, ≤3 h/>3 h; IVT: yes/no; ASPECTS EIH/CBV/MTT, 10/<10), only the evidence of normal CTP (ASPECTS MTT = 10) had a statistically significant impact (p = 0.02) on a good outcome (mRS 0.1).
Conclusion
MMCT sensitivity in acute lacunar or infratentorial stroke was poor. But, we found a high specifity and a fairly good sensitivity in territorial infarct detection. In acute stroke patients with normal MMCT findings on admission, a good clinical prognosis can be expected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lin K, Do KG, Ong P, Shapiro M, Babb JS, Siller KA, Pramanik BK (2009) Perfusion CT improves diagnostic accuracy for hyperacute ischemic stroke in the 3-hour window: study of 100 patients with diffusion MRI confirmation. Cerebrovasc Dis 28:72–79
Lovblad KO, Baird AE (2009) Computed tomography in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology 52:175–187
Wintermark M, Flanders AE, Velthuis B, Meuli R, van Leeuwen M, Goldsher D, Pineda C, Serena J, van der Schaaf I, Waaijer A, Anderson J, Nesbit G, Gabriely I, Medina V, Quiles A, Pohlman S, Quist M, Schnyder P, Bogousslavsky J, Dillon WP, Pedraza S (2006) Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 37:979–985
Tan JC, Dillon WP, Liu S, Adler F, Smith WS, Wintermark M (2007) Systematic comparison of perfusion-CT and CT-angiography in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 61:533–543
Wintermark M, Fischbein NJ, Smith WS, Ko NU, Quist M, Dillon WP (2005) Accuracy of dynamic perfusion CT with deconvolution in detecting acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:104–112
Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM (2000) Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS study group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score published erratum appears in Lancet 2000 Jun 17;355(9221):2170. Lancet 355:1670–1674
Lee JY, Kim SH, Lee MS, Park SH, Lee SS (2008) Prediction of clinical outcome with baseline and 24-hour perfusion CT in acute middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke treated with intravenous recanalization therapy. Neuroradiology 50:391–396
Barber PA, Zhang J, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Buchan AM (2001) Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility. Neurology 56:1015–1020
Berger C, Fiorelli M, Steiner T, Schabitz WR, Bozzao L, Bluhmki E, Hacke W, von Kummer R (2001) Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic brain tissue: asymptomatic or symptomatic? Stroke 32:1330–1335
Mathews MS, Smith WS, Wintermark M, Dillon WP, Binder DK (2008) Local cortical hypoperfusion imaged with CT perfusion during postictal Todd's paresis. Neuroradiology 50:397–401
Rai AT, Carpenter JS, Peykanu JA, Popovich T, Hobbs GR, Riggs JE (2008) The role of CT perfusion imaging in acute stroke diagnosis: a large single-center experience. J Emerg Med 35:287–292
Youn SW, Kim JH, Weon YC, Kim SH, Han MK, Bae HJ (2008) Perfusion CT of the brain using 40-mm-wide detector and toggling table technique for initial imaging of acute stroke. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:W120–W126
Salomon EJ, Barfett J, Willems PW, Geibprasert S, Bacigaluppi S, Krings T (2009) Dynamic CT angiography and CT perfusion employing a 320-detector row CT: protocol and current clinical applications. Klin Neuroradiol 19:187–196
Chalela JA, Kidwell CS, Nentwich LM, Luby M, Butman JA, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Patronas N, Latour L, Warach S (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet 369:293–298
Sylaja PN, Coutts SB, Krol A, Hill MD, Demchuk AM (2008) When to expect negative diffusion-weighted images in stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke 39:1898–1900
Mikulik R, Goldemund D, Reif M, Aulicky P, Krupa P (2009) Outcome of patients with negative CT angiography results for arterial occlusion treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 40:868–872
Lin K, Rapalino O, Lee B, Do KG, Ong P, Shapiro M, Babb JS, Siller KA, Pramanik BK (2009) Correlation of volumetric mismatch and mismatch of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores on CT perfusion maps. Neuroradiology 51:17–23
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eckert, B., Küsel, T., Leppien, A. et al. Clinical outcome and imaging follow-up in acute stroke patients with normal perfusion CT and normal CT angiography. Neuroradiology 53, 79–88 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0702-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0702-9