Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype affects the pharmacokinetics of controlled-release paroxetine in healthy Chinese subjects: comparison of traditional phenotype and activity score systems

  • Pharmacogenetics
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the effects of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of controlled-release paroxetine in healthy Chinese subjects and used paroxetine as a tool drug to compare the performance of traditional phenotype and activity score systems.

Methods

Pharmacokinetic data were evaluated in 24 subjects who received a single oral dose of 25 mg controlled-release paroxetine. Plasma paroxetine concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. CYP2D6 genotypes were tested by PCR and direct DNA sequencing. Subjects were classified by two systems of phenotype prediction. In the traditional phenotype system, subjects were classified as extensive metabolizers or intermediate metabolizers; in the activity score system, subjects were divided into four activity groups. Analysis of variance testing was applied to estimate the effects of CYP2D6 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine.

Results

With the traditional phenotype system, significant differences were observed in the following pharmacokinetic parameters of paroxetine: t 1/2, C max, AUC0–t, AUC0–inf, Vz/F, and CL/F (all P < 0.05). The AUC or exposure of paroxetine was about 3.5-fold higher in the intermediate metabolizer group than in the extensive metabolizer group. With the activity score system, significant differences were observed in the t 1/2, C max, AUC0–t, AUC0–inf, Vz/F, and CL/F among the four different activity score groups (all P < 0.05). We found that the AUC of paroxetine decreased by around one half as the activity score increased by 0.5.

Conclusion

The pharmacokinetics of controlled-release paroxetine after a single administration was affected by CYP2D6 polymorphisms. Both the traditional phenotype and the activity score systems performed well and distinguished subjects with different drug exposures. The activity score system provided a more detailed classification for the subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gibiino S, Serretti A (2012) Paroxetine for the treatment of depression: a critical update. Expert Opin Pharmacother 13(3):421–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilles M, Deuschle M, Kellner S et al (2005) Paroxetine serum concentrations in depressed patients and response to treatment. Pharmacopsychiatry 38(3):118–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yasui-Furukori N, Nakagami T, Kaneda A et al (2011) Inverse correlation between clinical response to paroxetine and plasma drug concentration in patients with major depressive disorders. Hum Psychopharmacol 26(8):602–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaye CM, Haddock RE, Langley PF et al (1989) A review of the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of paroxetine in man. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 350:60–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jornil J, Jensen KG, Larsen F, Linnet K (2010) Identification of cytochrome P450 isoforms involved in the metabolism of paroxetine and estimation of their importance for human paroxetine metabolism using a population-based simulator. Drug Metab Dispos 38(3):376–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ten LK, Bertilsson L (2012) Pharmacogenomics of CYP2D6: molecular genetics, interethnic differences and clinical importance. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 27(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.cypalleles.ki.se/

  8. Hicks JK, Swen JJ, Thorn CF, Sangkuhl K, Kharasch ED, Ellingrod VL, Skaar TC, Müller DJ, Gaedigk A, Stingl JC (2013) Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of tricyclic antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther 93(5):402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaedigk A (2013) Complexities of CYP2D6 gene analysis and interpretation. Int Rev Psychiatry 25(5):534–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaedigk A, Simon SD, Pearce RE, Bradford LD, Kennedy MJ, Leeder JS (2008) The CYP2D6 activity score: translating genotype information into a qualitative measure of phenotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 83(2):234–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saruwatari J (2014) Nakashima H1, Tsuchimine S2, Nishimura M1, Ogusu N1, Yasui-Furukori N2. Possible impact of the CYP2D6*10 polymorphism on the nonlinear pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depressive disorders. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 28(7):121–127

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ververs FF, Voorbij HA, Zwarts P, Belitser SV, Egberts TC, Visser GH, Schobben AF (2009) Effect of cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype on maternal paroxetine plasma concentrations during pregnancy. Clin Pharmacokinet 48(10):677–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gex-Fabry M, Eap CB, Oneda B, Gervasoni N, Aubry JM, Bondolfi G, Bertschy G (2008) CYP2D6 and ABCB1 genetic variability: influence on paroxetine plasma level and therapeutic response. Ther Drug Monit 30(4):474–482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim KS, Cho JY, Jang IJ, Kim BH, Kim J, Jeon JY, Tae YM, Yi S, Eum S, Shin SG, Yu KS (2008) Pharmacokinetic interaction of flecainide and paroxetine in relation to the CYP2D6*10 allele in healthy Korean subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 66(5):660–666

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Qian JC, Xu XM, Hu GX, Dai DP, Xu RA, Hu LM, Li FH, Zhang XH, Yang JF, Cai JP (2013) Genetic variations of human CYP2D6 in the Chinese Han population. Pharmacogenomics 14(14):1731–1743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3

  17. Yoo HD, Cho HY, Lee SN, Yoon H, Lee YB (2012) Population pharmacokinetic analysis of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone with genetic polymorphisms of CYP2D6 and ABCB1. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 39(4):329–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SJ, Lee SS, Jung HJ, Kim HS, Park SJ, Yeo CW, Shin JG (2009) Discovery of novel functional variants and extensive evaluation of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms in Koreans. Drug Metab Dispos 37(7):1464–1470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Nuijs AL, Tarcomnicu I, Simons W, Bervoets L, Blust R, Jorens PG, Neels H, Covaci A (2010) Optimization and validation of a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of 13 top-prescribed pharmaceuticals in influent wastewater. Anal Bioanal Chem 398(5):2211–2222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gómez MJ, Petrović M, Fernández-Alba AR, Barceló D (2006) Determination of pharmaceuticals of various therapeutic classes by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis in hospital effluent wastewaters. J Chromatogr A 1114(2):224–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stingl JC, Brockmöller J, Viviani R (2013) Genetic variability of drug-metabolizing enzymes: the dual impact on psychiatric therapy and regulation of brain function. Mol Psychiatry 18(3):273–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim JS, Chen XA, Singh O, Yap YS, Ng RC, Wong NS, Wong M, Lee EJ, Chowbay B (2011) Impact of CYP2D6, CYP3A5, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms on tamoxifen pharmacokinetics in Asian breast cancer patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 71(5):737–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nishida Y, Fukuda T, Yamamoto I, Azuma J (2000) CYP2D6 genotypes in a Japanese population: low frequencies of CYP2D6 gene duplication but high frequency of CYP2D6*10. Pharmacogenetics 10(6):567–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zuo LJ, Guo T, Xia DY, Jia LH (2012) Allele and genotype frequencies of CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 in Han, Uighur, Hui, and Mongolian Chinese populations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 16(2):102–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ji L, Pan S, Marti-Jaun J, Hänseler E, Rentsch K, Hersberger M (2002) Single-step assays to analyze CYP2D6 gene polymorphisms in Asians: allele frequencies and a novel *14B allele in mainland Chinese. Clin Chem 48(7):983–988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sindrup SH, Brøsen K, Gram LF et al (1992) The relationship between paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism. Clin Pharmacol Ther 51(3):278–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by a grant from the National Program on Key Research Project of New Drug Innovation (No. 2012ZX09303006-002). All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, R., Wang, H., Shi, J. et al. Cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype affects the pharmacokinetics of controlled-release paroxetine in healthy Chinese subjects: comparison of traditional phenotype and activity score systems. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71, 835–841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1855-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1855-6

Keywords

Navigation