Abstract
Purpose
Combined paracetamol and ibuprofen has been shown to be more effective than either constituent alone for acute pain in adults, but the dose-response has not been confirmed. The aim of this study was to define the analgesic dose-response relationship of different potential doses of a fixed dose combination containing paracetamol and ibuprofen after third molar surgery.
Methods
Patients aged 16 to 60 years with moderate or severe pain after the removal of at least two impacted third molars were randomised to receive double-blind study medication as two tablets every 6 h for 24 h of either of the following: two tablet, combination full dose (paracetamol 1000 mg and ibuprofen 300 mg); one tablet, combination half dose (paracetamol 500 mg and ibuprofen 150 mg); half a tablet, combination quarter dose (paracetamol 250 mg and ibuprofen 75 mg); or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the time-adjusted summed pain intensity difference over 24 h (SPID 24) calculated from the 100-mm VAS assessments collected over multiple time points for the study duration.
Results
Data from 159 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) time-adjusted SPID over 24 h were full-dose combination 20.1 (18.0), half dose combination 20.4 (20.8), quarter dose combination 19.3 (20.0) and placebo 6.6 (19.8). There was a significant overall effect of dose (p = 0.002) on the primary outcome. Planned pairwise comparisons showed that all combination dose groups were superior to placebo (full dose vs. placebo p = 0.004, half dose vs. placebo p = 0.002, quarter dose vs. placebo p = 0.002). The overall effect of dose was also significant for maximum VAS pain intensity score (p = 0.048), response rate (p = 0.0094), percentage of participants requiring rescue (p = 0.025) and amount of rescue (p < 0.001). No significant dose effect was found for time to peak reduction in VAS or time to meaningful pain relief. The majority of adverse events recorded were of mild (52.75 %) or moderate (40.16 %) severity and not related (30.7 %) or unlikely related (57.5 %) to the study medication.
Conclusion
All doses of the combination provide safe superior pain relief to placebo in adult patients following third molar removal surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman RD (2004) A rationale for combining acetaminophen and NSAIDs for mild-to-moderate pain. Clin Exp Rheumatol 22(1):110–117
Lee WM (2004) Acetaminophen and the U.S. Acute Liver Failure Study Group: lowering the risks of hepatic failure. Hepatol Baltim Md 40(1):6–9
Anderson BJ (2013) Is it farewell to codeine? Arch Dis Child 98:986–988
Herr K (2002) Chronic pain in ther older patient: management strategies. J Gerontol Nurs 28(2):28–34
Bloor M, Paech M (2013) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and the initiation of lactation. Anesth Analg 116(5):1063–1075
EMEA/CHMP/410051/2006. Opinion of the committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use Pursuant to Articles 5 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 FNN-s [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2010/01/WC500054342.pdf
Marcum ZA, Hanlon JT (2010) Recognizing the risks of chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in older adults. Ann Long Term Care Off J Am Med Dir Assoc 18(9):24
Merry AF, Gibbs RD, Edwards J, Ting GS, Frampton C, Davies E et al (2010) Combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 104(1):80–88
Cooper SA, Desjardins PJ (2010) The value of the dental impaction pain model in drug development. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ 617:175–190
Singla NK, Desjardins PJ, Chang PD (2014) A comparison of the clinical and experimental characteristics of four acute surgical pain models: dental extraction, bunionectomy, joint replacement, and soft tissue surgery. Pain 155(3):441–456
Urquhart E (1994) Analgesic agents and strategies in the dental pain model. J Dent 22(6):336–341
Nørholt SE (1998) Treatment of acute pain following removal of mandibular third molars. Use of the dental pain model in pharmacological research and development of a comparable animal model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27(Suppl 1):1–41
Desjardins P, Black P, Papageorge M, Norwood T, Shen DD, Norris L et al (2002) Ibuprofen arginate provides effective relief from postoperative dental pain with a more rapid onset of action than ibuprofen. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58(6):387–394
Schou S, Nielsen H, Nattestad A, Hillerup S, Ritzau M, Branebjerg PE et al (1998) Analgesic dose-response relationship of ibuprofen 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg after surgical removal of third molars: a single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind study of 304 patients. J Clin Pharmacol 38(5):447–454
Derry C, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (2009) Single dose oral ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD001548
Barden J, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ, Andrew Moore R (2004) Pain and analgesic response after third molar extraction and other postsurgical pain. Pain 107(1–2):86–90
CPMP/ICH/378/95 (1994) Dose-response information to support drug registration E4. Dose-response. E4
RxList. The top 200 prescriptions by numbe rof US prescriptions dispensed [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.rxlist.com/script/main/hp.asp
Acknowledgments
We are most grateful to the participants who volunteered to take part in this research. We wish to thank Mr Christopher Seeley, Mrs Anneke Marais, Mrs Julia Matheson and Ms Ali Maoate for administration of the study protocol and data collection. We are grateful to Dr. Jennifer Zhang for trial monitoring, Dr. Amanda Potts for her assistance in drafting this manuscript and Mrs. Ioana Stanescu for reviewing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atkinson, H.C., Currie, J., Moodie, J. et al. Combination paracetamol and ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery: a dose ranging study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71, 579–587 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1827-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1827-x