Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review employing meta-analysis

  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The optimal therapy involving linezolid or vancomycin for suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nosocomial pneumonia (NP) remains controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid and vancomycin therapies in patients with NP.

Methods

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analyses performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We screened for relevant randomized controlled studies in which patients with NP were enrolled and linezolid and vancomycin therapies were compared.

Results

Nine trials involving 2618 pneumonia patients were reviewed. Linezolid was not found to be superior to vancomycin for clinical cure when categories of pathogen were not considered and in a subgroup of NP patients with MRSA infection [relative risk (RR) = 1.16, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.95–1.43, P = 0.15]. Compared with vancomycin, linezolid has no difference in the overall microbiological eradication rate (RR = 1.12, 95 % CI = 0.96–1.30, P = 0.15) and specific MRSA eradication rate (RR = 1.16, 95 % CI = 0.93–1.45, P = 0.19) in NP patients. In addition, nephrotoxicity was more frequent with vancomycin (RR = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.31–0.81, P = 0.005), but no differences between the treatments were found for all-cause mortality, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal effects, and drug discontinuation due to adverse events.

Conclusion

These results suggest that linezolid is not superior to vancomycin with respect to both clinical and microbiological cure rates in patients with MRSA NP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Andrus ML, Dudeck MA, Pollock DA, Horan TC, National Healthcare Safety Network F (2008) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006 through 2007, issued November 2008. Am J Infect Control 36(9):609–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, Moreno R, Lipman J, Gomersall C, Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Investigators EIGo (2009) International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 302(21):2323–2329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kallen AJ, Mu Y, Bulens S, Reingold A, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray SM, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Schaffner W, Patel PR, Fridkin SK, Active Bacterial Core surveillance MIotEIP (2010) Health care-associated invasive MRSA infections, 2005–2008. JAMA 304(6):641–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vardakas KZ, Matthaiou DK, Falagas ME (2009) Incidence, characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe community acquired-MRSA pneumonia. Eur Respir J 34(5):1148–1158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang F, Zhu DM, Hu FP, Zhang YY (2001) Surveillance of bacterial resistance among isolates in Shanghai in 1999. J Infect Chemother 7(2):117–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, Wolff M, Spencer RC, Hemmer M (1995) The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 274(8):639–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2003) Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 36(1):53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shorr AF, Combes A, Kollef MH, Chastre J (2006) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prolongs intensive care unit stay in ventilator-associated pneumonia, despite initially appropriate antibiotic therapy. Crit Care Med 34(3):700–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2005) The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26(2):166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wunderink RG, Rello J, Cammarata SK, Croos-Dabrera RV, Kollef MH (2003) Linezolid vs vancomycin: analysis of two double-blind studies of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia. Chest 124(5):1789–1797

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peyrani P, Wiemken TL, Kelley R, Zervos MJ, Kett DH, File TM Jr, Stein GE, Ford KD, Scerpella EG, Welch V, Ramirez JA (2014) Higher clinical success in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with linezolid compared with vancomycin: results from the IMPACT-HAP study. Crit Care 18(3):R118

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Powers JH, Ross DB, Lin D, Soreth J (2004) Linezolid and vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: the subtleties of subgroup analyses. Chest 126(1):314–315, author reply 315–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalil AC, Puumala SE, Stoner J (2004) Unresolved questions with the use of linezolid vs vancomycin for nosocomial pneumonia. Chest 125(6):2370–2371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Walkey AJ, O’Donnell MR, Wiener RS (2011) Linezolid vs glycopeptide antibiotics for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest 139(5):1148–1155

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalil AC, Klompas M, Haynatzki G, Rupp ME (2013) Treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia with linezolid or vancomycin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 3(10):e003912

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalil AC, Murthy MH, Hermsen ED, Neto FK, Sun J, Rupp ME (2010) Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 38(9):1802–1808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wunderink RG, Niederman MS, Kollef MH, Shorr AF, Kunkel MJ, Baruch A, McGee WT, Reisman A, Chastre J (2012) Linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, controlled study. Clin Infect Dis 54(5):621–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. An MM, Shen H, Zhang JD, Xu GT, Jiang YY (2013) Linezolid versus vancomycin for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Antimicrob Agents 41(5):426–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu J, Ye X, Chen C, Chen S (2013) The efficacy and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. PLoS One 8(3):e58240

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson KA, Dickersin K (2002) Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed. Int J Epidemiol 31(1):150–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haynes RB, Wilczynski N, McKibbon KA, Walker CJ, Sinclair JC (1994) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1(6):447–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stevens DL, Herr D, Lampiris H, Hunt JL, Batts DH, Hafkin B (2002) Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Infect Dis 34(11):1481–1490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rubinstein E, Cammarata S, Oliphant T, Wunderink R (2001) Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis 32(3):402–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan SL, Deville JG, Yogev R, Morfin MR, Wu E, Adler S, Edge-Padbury B, Naberhuis-Stehouwer S, Bruss JB (2003) Linezolid versus vancomycin for treatment of resistant Gram-positive infections in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 22(8):677–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wunderink RG, Cammarata SK, Oliphant TH, Kollef MH (2003) Continuation of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Clin Ther 25(3):980–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jaksic B, Martinelli G, Perez-Oteyza J, Hartman CS, Leonard LB, Tack KJ (2006) Efficacy and safety of linezolid compared with vancomycin in a randomized, double-blind study of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis 42(5):597–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kohno S, Yamaguchi K, Aikawa N, Sumiyama Y, Odagiri S, Aoki N, Niki Y, Watanabe S, Furue M, Ito T, Croos-Dabrera R, Tack KJ (2007) Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother 60(6):1361–1369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin DF, Zhang YY, Wu JF, Wang F, Zheng JC, Miao JZ, Zheng LY, Sheng RY, Zhou X, Shen HH, Ijzerman MM, Croos-Dabrera RV, Sheng W (2008) Linezolid for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents 32(3):241–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wunderink RG, Mendelson MH, Somero MS, Fabian TC, May AK, Bhattacharyya H, Leeper KV Jr, Solomkin JS (2008) Early microbiological response to linezolid vs vancomycin in ventilator-associated pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Chest 134(6):1200–1207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cepeda JA, Whitehouse T, Cooper B, Hails J, Jones K, Kwaku F, Taylor L, Hayman S, Shaw S, Kibbler C, Shulman R, Singer M, Wilson AP (2004) Linezolid versus teicoplanin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the critically ill: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother 53(2):345–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong HY, Xie J, Chen LH, Wang TT, Zhao YR, Dong YL (2014) Therapeutic drug monitoring and receiver operating characteristic curve prediction may reduce the development of linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33(6):1029–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shorr AF, Susla GM, Kollef MH (2004) Linezolid for treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin. Crit Care Med 32(1):137–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grau S, Alvarez-Lerma F, del Castillo A, Neipp R, Rubio-Terres C (2005) Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia with linezolid or vancomycin in Spain. J Chemother 17(2):203–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Daniel Mullins C, Kuznik A, Shaya FT, Obeidat NA, Levine AR, Liu LZ, Wong W (2006) Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid compared with vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Ther 28(8):1184–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. De Cock E, Krueger WA, Sorensen S, Baker T, Hardewig J, Duttagupta S, Muller E, Piecyk A, Reisinger E, Resch A (2009) Cost-effectiveness of linezolid vs vancomycin in suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia in Germany. Infection 37(2):123–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81473177 and 81201490) for this work.

Conflict of interests

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

YW, YMZ, and YLD designed the study. YM, YMZ, YLD, and XWZ contributed to the data collection, data analysis, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript and revised subsequent drafts. TTW, JX, HRH, WHD, and JFX contributed to the interpretation of the data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the version to be published.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yalin Dong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Zou, Y., Xie, J. et al. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review employing meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 71, 107–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-014-1775-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-014-1775-x

Keywords

Navigation