Abstract
Background
Most patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) require systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy plus multitargeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI; e.g., sorafenib, sunitinib, cediranib, vandetanib, BIBF 1120, pazopanib, axitinib) has recently been evaluated in patients with NSCLC. However, the advantage of this therapy over chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced NSCLC remains largely unknown.
Methods
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy plus multitargeted antiangiogenic TKI with chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced NSCLC. PubMed, the ASCO and ESMO databases, and the Cochrane Library were searched for references to published articles. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the trials. Data were extracted, and overall response rate (ORR), pooled progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and major toxicities/adverse effects were analyzed.
Results
Six RCTs involving 3,337 patients with advanced NSCLC were ultimately analyzed. Compared to chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus multitargeted antiangiogenic TKI significantly increased the ORR [relative risk (RR) 1.71, 95 % CI 1.43–2.05] and PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95 % CI 0.76–0.90], but not OS (HR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.83–1.03). Patients who received chemotherapy plus multitargeted antiangiogenic TKI exhibited more rash, diarrhea and hypertension (OR 2.78, 95 % CI 2.37–3.26; OR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.65–2.24; OR 2.90, 95 % CI 2.19–3.84, respectively) and less nausea and vomiting (OR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.60–0.83; OR 0.75, 95 % CI 0.61–0.92, respectively). The incidence of hemorrhage, fatigue, cough, constipation, anorexia, and alopecia were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions
Therapy consisting of chemotherapy plus multitargeted antiangiogenic TKI was found to have specific advantages over chemotherapy alone in terms of PFS and ORR. The toxicity was comparable between the two therapies. Therefore, chemotherapy plus multitargeted antiangiogenic TKI may be a safe and valid therapeutic option for patients with advanced NSCLC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J et al (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300
Alberg A, Ford J, Samet J (2007) Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 132:29S–55S
Stinchcombe TE, Socinski MA (2009) Current treatments for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc 6:233–241
Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R et al (2000) Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 18:2095–2103
Fossella FV, De Vore R, Kerr RN et al (2000) Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18:2354–2362
Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:1589–1597
Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD et al (2008) Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc 83:584–594
Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC et al (2006) Paclitaxel carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-smallcell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 355:2542–2550
Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T et al (2005) Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 353:123–132
Kim ES, Hirsh V, Mok T et al (2008) Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): A randomised phase III trial. Lancet 372:1809–1818
Pennell NA, Mekhai T (2009) Investigational agents in the management of non–small cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 11:275–284
Ciardiello F, Troiani T, Bianco R et al (2006) Interaction between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways: A rational approach for multitarget anticancer therapy. Ann Oncol 17:vii109–vii114
Naumov GN, Nilsson MB, Cascone T et al (2009) Combined vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade inhibits tumor growth in xenograft models of EGFR inhibitor resistance. Clin Cancer Res 15:3484–3494
Pennell NA, Lynch TJ (2009) Combined inhibition of the VEGFR and EGFR signaling pathways in the treatment of NSCLC. Oncologist 14:399–411
Ivy SP, Wick JY, Kaufman BM (2009) An overview of small molecule inhibitors of VEGFR signaling. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6:569–579
Ulahannan SV, Brahmer JR (2011) Antiangiogenic agents in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Invest 29(4):325–337
Herbst RS, Sun Y, Eberhardt WE et al (2010) Vandetanib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (ZODIAC): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:619–626
de Boer RH, Arrieta O, Yang CH et al (2011) Vandetanib plus pemetrexed for the second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:1067–1074
Heymach JV, Paz-Ares L, De Braud F et al (2008) Randomized phase II study of vandetanib alone or with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:5407–5415
Heymach JV, Johnson BE, Prager D et al (2007) Randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study of vandetanib plus docetaxel in previously treated non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:4270–4277
Scagliotti G, Novello S, von PJ et al (2010) Phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel alone or with sorafenib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1835–1842
Goss GD, Arnold A, Shepherd FA et al (2010) Randomized, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with either daily oral cediranib or placebo in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: NCIC clinical trials group BR24 study. J Clin Oncol 28:49–55
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J 315:629–634
Carmeliet P (2005) VEGF as a key mediator of angiogenesis in cancer. Oncology 69[Suppl 3]:4–10
Bremnes RM, Camps C, Sirera R (2006) Angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer: the prognostic impact of neo angiogenesis and the cytokines VEGF and bFGF in tumors and blood. Lung Cancer 51:143–158
Grzegorz Korpanty G, Smyth E, Sullivan LA (2010) Antiangiogenic therapy in lung cancer: focus on vascular endothelial growth factor pathway. Exp Biol Med 235:3–9
Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L et al (2004) BAY 43–9006 exhibits broad-spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 64:7099–7109
Nikolinakos P, Heymach JV (2008) The tyrosine kinase inhibitor cediranib for non-small cell lung cancer and other thoracic malignancies. JThorac Oncol 3[6 Suppl 2]:S131–S134
Herbst RS (2006) Toxicities of antiangiogenic therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 8[Suppl 1]:S23–S30
Ricciardi S, Tomao S, de Marinis F (2009) Toxicity of targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer management. Clin Lung Cancer 10:28–35
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, YY., Zhan, P., Yuan, DM. et al. Chemotherapy plus multitargeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy alone in advanced NSCLC: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69, 151–159 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-012-1333-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-012-1333-3