Skip to main content
Log in

Refracture following Fracture Liaison Service Assessment Illustrates the Requirement for Integrated Falls and Fracture Services

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) allows appropriate antiosteoporosis therapy to be targeted to potentially reduce future fracture risk. A proportion of these treated patients will still experience a further fracture. This work reviews the characteristics of these patients. Data were collated for patients >65 years old presenting to the South Glasgow FLS between January 2001 and August 2004. There were 2,489 patients who presented (incident fracture group), and 129 (5.2%) sustained an additional fracture (refracture group). Median age of the incident fracture group was 77.8 years vs. 80.6 years for the refracture group (P = nonsignificant). The refracture group was determined according to whether their incident fracture was hip (n = 47) or nonhip (n = 82). When the incident fracture was hip, a refracture was more likely to be a further hip fracture (χ2 = 14.4, P = 0.002) and patients refractured sooner (median time to refracture 194 [range 10–1,134] days vs. 258 [range 6–1,081] days [nonhip]) (P = nonsignificant). In the refracture group, 76% of patients were already on osteoporosis treatment after their incident fracture. Patients over 65 years of age presenting to FLS who sustain an additional fracture are older; are likely to sustain another hip fracture after an incident hip fracture; often refracture early, particularly when the incident fracture is of the hip; and are often already on antiosteoporosis treatment. Therefore, it is important to identify these high-risk patients and offer a combined approach of prompt drug treatment through a systematic and specialist osteoporosis management team along with reducing any reversible falls risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Health (2001) National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/ OlderPeoplesServices/fs/en

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scottish Executive (2002) Adding Life to Years: Report of the Expert Group on Healthcare of Older People. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library3/health/ alty.pdf

  3. Northern Health and Social Services Board (2002) Ringing the Changes: A Strategy for Older People. Ballymena Northern Health and Social Services Board: http://www.nhssb.n-i.nhs.uk/publications/files/Elderly Care Strategy Summary.pdf

  4. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatric Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention (2001) Guideline for the prevention of falls in older people. J Am Ger Soc 49:664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Robertson MC, Lamb SE, Cumming RJ, Rowe BH (2003) Intervention for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD000340

  6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidelines on the Prevention of Falls and Injuries in Older People, vol 21. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2002) Prevention and management of hip fracture in older people. SIGN 56, http://www.sign.ac.uk

  8. British Orthopaedic Association Blue Book (2003) The care of fragility fracture patients, http://www.boa.ac.uk/

  9. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2003) Management of Osteoporosis. SIGN 71, http://www.sign.ac.uk

  10. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2005) Bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) and parathyroid (teriparatide) for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. Technology Appraisal 87 January 2005 http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=241341 t

  11. Royal College of Physicians (2003) Osteoporosis. Clinical Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment. Update. London: Royal College of Physicians

    Google Scholar 

  12. All Party Parliamentary Osteoporosis Group (2004) Falling short. Delivering integrated falls and osteoporosis services in England, http://www.nos.org.uk/media/APPOG%20Report.pdf

  13. Oliver D, McMurdo MET, Patel S (2005) Secondary prevention of falls and osteoporotic fractures in older people. BMJ 331:123–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell AJ, Reinken J, Allan BC, et al. (1981) Falls in old age: a study of frequency and related clinical factors. Age Ageing 10:264–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prudham D, Evans JG (1981) Factors associated with falls in the elderly: a community study. Age Ageing 10:141–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF (1988) Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living within the community. N Engl J Med 319:1701–1707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF, et al. (1990) Circumstances and consequences of falls experienced by a community population 70 years and over during a prospective study. Age Ageing 337:1279–1284

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baker SP, Harvey AH (1995) Fall injuries in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1:501–512

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gryfe CI, Amies A, Ashley MJ (1987) A longitudinal study of falls in an elderly population. Incidence and morbidity. Age Ageing 6(4):201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tinetti ME (1987) Factors associated with serious injury during falls by ambulatory nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 35:644–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cumming RG, Salkeld G, Thomas M, Szonyi G (2000) Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling in activities of daily living, SF-36 scores and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 55:299–305

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tinetti ME, Mendes de Leon CF, Doucette JT, Baker DI (1994) Fear of falling and fall related efficacy in relationship to functioning community living elders. J Gerontol 49:140–147

    Google Scholar 

  23. Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E, Jackson S, Swift C (1999) Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353:93–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanis JA, Johnell O, de Laet C, et al. (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta analysis of how well measures of bone density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fracture. BMJ 312:1245–1259

    Google Scholar 

  26. Klotzbeucher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al. (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a survey of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian CA (2003) The Fracture Liaison Service: success of a programme for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Osteoporosis Management Systems, www.gismo-glasgow.com

  29. Fracture Prevention Forum Steering Group; Gallacher SJ, McLellan AR, Keen R, et al. (2005) Strategies for the management of patients with new fragility fracture: a toolkit for selective case-finding, http://www.jbmedical.com/newtoolkit.pdf

  30. Fighting Fractures Steering Group; Bainbridge P, Bayly J, Brown P, et al. (2006) Strategies for management of patients with prior fragility fractures: a toolkit for selective case-finding, http://www.jbmedical.com/priortoolkit.pdf

  31. Brankin E, Mitchell C, Munro R (2005) Closing the osteoporosis management gap in primary care: a secondary prevention of fracture programme. Curr Med Res Opin 21:475–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Youm T, Koral KJ, Kummer FJ, et al. (1999) Do all hip fractures result from a fall? Am J Orthop 28:190–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harkness M, McQuillian CA, Gallacher SJ (2004) Adherence with anti-osteoporosis drug therapy – a comparison of a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) and Direct Access DXA Service. Poster 141 presented at the National Osteoporosis Society 10th Scientific Conference, November 28-December 1, 2004

  34. Reginster JY, Seeman E, de Vernejoul MC, et al. (2005) Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2816–2822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harrington JT, Ste-Marie LG, Brandi ML, et al. (2004) Risedronate rapidly reduces the risk for nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 74:129–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge that Fig 1 was originally published in Osteoporosis International (2003);14:1028-1023 Fig 1. DOI 10.1007/s00198-003-1507-2. It was reproduced with kind permission of Springer Science and Business Media. Copyright with International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2003

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire R. Langridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langridge, C.R., McQuillian, C., Watson, W.S. et al. Refracture following Fracture Liaison Service Assessment Illustrates the Requirement for Integrated Falls and Fracture Services. Calcif Tissue Int 81, 85–91 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-007-9042-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-007-9042-0

Keywords

Navigation