Abstract
Although postural control requires the integration of different sensory cues, little is known about the role of attentional artifacts on the individual’s ability to properly respond to postural challenges. This study investigated the effects of concomitant tasks (cognitive and postural) on the relationship between visual information and body sway. Thirty healthy adults were asked to stand still inside of a moving room on normal and reduced bases of support. Initially, the participants were not aware of any visual manipulation and were asked to perform tasks that required concomitant attentional demands. Then, all participants were informed about the visual manipulation and were requested to resist it. The results showed that information about visual manipulation changed the coupling between visual information and body sway, but only in a less demanding task, and that it was affected by the concomitant task. The coupling between visual information and body sway for postural control does not demand attention on a regular basis, but any change in this relationship demands attention and occurs in less demanding postural tasks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguiar SA, Gramani-Say K, Lopes AG, Barela JA (2014) Dual task interferes with sensorimotor coupling in postural control. Psychol Neurosci 7:593–599. doi:10.3922/j.psns.2014.4.19
Andersson G, Hagman J, Talianzadeh R, Svedberg A, Larsen HC (2002) Effect of cognitive load on postural control. Brain Res Bull 58:135–139. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00770-0
Barela JA, Jeka JJ, Clark JE (2003) Postural control in children: coupling to dynamic somatosensory information. Exp Brain Res 150:434–442. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1441-5
Barela AMF, Barela JA, Rinaldi NM, de Toledo DR (2009) Influence of imposed optic flow characteristics and intention on postural responses. Mot Control 13:119–129
Barela JA, Weigelt M, Polastri PF, Godoi D, Aguiar SA, Jeka JJ (2014) Explicit and implicit knowledge of environment states induce adaptation in postural control. Neurosci Lett 566:6–10. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.029
Bucci MP, Ajrezo L, Wiener-Vacher S (2015) Oculomotor tasks affect differently postural control in healthy children. Int J Dev Neurosci 46:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.05.008
Dijkstra TM, Schöner G, Giese MA, Gielen CC (1994) Frequency dependence of the action-perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment: relative phase dynamics. Biol Cybern 71:489–501
Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA (2004) Postural control as a function of self- and object-motion perception. Neurosci Lett 369:64–68. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.07.075
Horak FB, Macpherson JM (1996) Postural orientation and equilibrium. In: Rowell LB, Shepard JT (eds) Handbook of physiology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 255–292
Jeka JJ, Ribeiro P, Oie K, Lackner JR (1998) The structure of somatosensory information for human postural control. Mot Control 2:13–33
Jeka JJ, Oie KS, Kiemel T (2008) Asymmetric adaptation with functional advantage in human sensorimotor control. Exp Brain Res 191:453–463. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1539-x
Nashner LM (1981) Analysis of stance posture in humans. In: Towe AL, Luschei ES (eds) Motor coordination (handbook of behavioral neurology), vol 5., Plenum PressNew York, NY, pp 527–565
Oullier O, Bardy BG, Stoffregen TA, Bootsma RJ (2002) Postural coordination in looking and tracking tasks. Hum Mov Sci 21:147–167
Oullier O, Bardy BG, Stoffregen TA, Bootsma RJ (2004) Task-specific stabilization of postural coordination during stance on a beam. Mot Control 8:174–187
Polastri PF, Barela JA, Kiemel T, Jeka JJ (2012) Dynamics of inter-modality re-weighting during human postural control. Exp Brain Res 223:99–108. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3244-z
Prado JM, Stoffregen TA, Duarte M (2007) Postural sway during dual tasks in young and elderly adults. Gerontology 53:274–281. doi:10.1159/000102938
Prioli AC, Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA (2005) Physical activity and postural control in the elderly: coupling between visual information and body sway. Gerontology 51:145–148. doi:10.1159/000083984
Prioli AC, Cardozo AS, Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA Jr. (2006) Task demand effects on postural control in older adults. Hum Mov Sci 25:435–446. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2006.03.003
Remaud A, Boyas S, Caron GAR, Bilodeau M (2012) Attentional demands associated with postural control depend on task difficulty and visual condition. J Mot Behav 44:329–340. doi:10.1080/00222895.2012.708680
Rinaldi NM, Polastri PF, Barela JA (2009) Age-related changes in postural control sensory reweighting. Neurosci Lett 467:225–229. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.042
Schöner G, Dijkstra TMH, Jeka JJ (1998) Action-perception patterns emerge from coupling and adaptation. Ecol Psychol 10:323–346. doi:10.1207/S15326969eco103&4_9
Siu KC, Catena RD, Chou LS, van Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH (2008) Effects of a secondary task on obstacle avoidance in healthy young adults. Exp Brain Res 184:115–120. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1087-9
Stoffregen TA, Hove P, Schmit J, Bardy BG (2006) Voluntary and involuntary postural responses to imposed optic flow. Mot Control 10:24–33
Streepey JW, Angulo-Kinzler RM (2002) The role of task difficulty in the control of dynamic balance in children and adults. Hum Mov Sci 21:423–438
Toledo DR, Barela JA (2014) Age-related differences in postural control: effects of the complexity of visual manipulation and sensorimotor contribution to postural performance. Exp Brain Res 232:493–502. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3756-1
Viana AR, Razuk M, Freitas Junior PB, Barela JA (2013) Sensorimotor integration in dyslexic children under different sensory stimulations. PLoS ONE 8:e72719. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072719
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Genoves, G.G., Barela, A.M.F., Sanches, C. et al. Attentional artifacts in sensorimotor coupling in the postural control of young adults. Exp Brain Res 234, 3641–3647 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4762-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4762-x