Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The motor and the brake of the trailing leg in human walking: leg force control through ankle modulation and knee covariance

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human walking is a complex task, and we lack a complete understanding of how the neuromuscular system organizes its numerous muscles and joints to achieve consistent and efficient walking mechanics. Focused control of select influential task-level variables may simplify the higher-level control of steady-state walking and reduce demand on the neuromuscular system. As trailing leg power generation and force application can affect the mechanical efficiency of step-to-step transitions, we investigated how joint torques are organized to control leg force and leg power during human walking. We tested whether timing of trailing leg force control corresponded with timing of peak leg power generation. We also applied a modified uncontrolled manifold analysis to test whether individual or coordinated joint torque strategies most contributed to leg force control. We found that leg force magnitude was adjusted from step to step to maintain consistent leg power generation. Leg force modulation was primarily determined by adjustments in the timing of peak ankle plantar-flexion torque, while knee torque was simultaneously covaried to dampen the effect of ankle torque on leg force. We propose a coordinated joint torque control strategy in which the trailing leg ankle acts as a motor to drive leg power production while trailing leg knee torque acts as a brake to refine leg power production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Af Klint R, Mazzaro N et al (2010) Load rather than length sensitive feedback contributes to soleus muscle activity during human treadmill walking. J Neurophysiol 103(5):2747–2756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Auyang AG, Yen JT et al (2009) Neuromechanical stabilization of leg length and orientation through interjoint compensation during human hopping. Exp Brain Res 192(2):253–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman JM, Chang YH (2013) Rules to limp by: joint compensation conserves limb function after peripheral nerve injury. Biol Lett 9(5):20130484

  • Bosco G, Poppele RE (2000) Reference frames for spinal proprioception: kinematics based or kinetics based? J Neurophysiol 83:2946–2955

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosco G, Poppele RE et al (2000) Reference frames for spinal proprioception: limb endpoint based or joint-level based? J Neurophysiol 83:2931–2945

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capaday C (2002) The special nature of human walking and its neural control. Trends Neurosci 25(7):370–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins S, Ruina A et al (2005) Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers. Science 307:1082–1085

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin NJ, Avela J et al (2013) Differences in contractile behaviour between the soleus and medial gastrocnemius muscles during human walking. J Exp Biol 216(5):909–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daley MA, Biewener AA (2006) Running over rough terrain reveals limb control for intrinsic stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(42):15681–15686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Daley MA, Felix G et al (2007) Running stability is enhanced by a proximo-distal gradient in joint neuromechanical control. J Exp Biol 210(3):383–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Donelan JM, Kram R et al (2002a) Mechanical work for step-to-step transitions is a major determinant of the metabolic cost of human walking. J Exp Biol 205(23):3717–3727

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donelan JM, Kram R et al (2002b) Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking. J Biomech 35(1):117–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faist M, Hoefer C et al (2006) In humans Ib facilitation depends on locomotion while suppression of Ib inhibition requires loading. Brain Res 1076:87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farris DJ, Sawicki GS (2012) Human medial gastrocnemius force-velocity behavior shifts with locomotion speed and gait. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(3):977–982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M, Chatterjee A et al (2000) Efficiency, speed, and scaling of two-dimensional passive-dynamic walking. Dyn Stab Syst 15(2):75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorniak SL, Zatsiorsky VM et al (2007) Emerging and disappearing synergies in a hierarchically controlled system. Exp Brain Res 183(2):259–270

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gorniak S, Zatsiorsky V et al (2009) Hierarchical control of static prehension: II. Multi-digit synergies. Exp Brain Res 194(1):1–15 

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granata P, Marras WS (2000) Cost–benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability. Spine 25(11):1398–1404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa M, Komi PV et al (2005) Muscle-tendon interaction and elastic energy usage in human walking. J Appl Physiol 99(2):603–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kepple TM, Siegel KL et al (1997) Relative contributions of the lower extremity joint moments to forward progression and support during gait. Gait Posture 6(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib O (1987) A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators—the operational space formulation. IEEE J Robot Autom 3(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Collins SH (2015) Once-per-step control of ankle-foot prosthesis push-off work reduces effort associated with balance during walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12:43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kram R, Griffin TM, Donelan JM, Chang YH (1998) Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces. J Appl Physiol 85:764–769

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo AD (2002) Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 124(1):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurz MJ, Judkins TN et al (2008) A passive dynamic walking robot that has a deterministic nonlinear gait. J Biomech 41:1310–1316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP et al (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30(1):26-31

  • McGeer T (1990) Passive dynamic walking. Int J Robot Res 9(2):62–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neptune RR, Kautz SA et al (2001) Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J Biomech 34(11):1387–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neptune RR, Zajac FE, Kautz SA (2004) Muscle mechanical work requirements during normal walking: the energetic cost of raising the body’s center-of-mass is significant. J Biomech 37:817–825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols TR (1999) Receptor mechanisms underlying heterogenic reflexes among the triceps surae muscles of the cat. J Neurophysiol 81(2):467–478

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JB, Sinkjaer T (2002) Afferent feedback in the control of human gait. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12:213–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson J, Thorstensson A (1989) Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. Acta Physiol Scand 136(2):217–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TJ (2002) The integrated function of muscles and tendons during locomotion. Comp Biochem Physiol Mol Integr Physiol 133(4):1087–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TJ, Azizi E (2011) Flexible mechanisms: the diverse roles of biological springs in vertebrate movement. J Exp Biol 214(3):353–361

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts TJ, Marsh RL (2003) Probing the limits to muscle-powered accelerations: lessons from jumping bullfrogs. J Exp Biol 206(15):2567–2580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruina A, Bertram JEA et al (2005) A collisional model of the energetic cost of support work qualitatively explains leg sequencing in walking and galloping, pseudo-elastic leg behavior in running and the walk-to-run transition. J Theor Biol 237:170–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawicki GS, Robertson BD, Azizi E, Roberts TJ (2015) Timing matters: tuning the mechanics of a muscle-tendon unit by adjusting stimulation phase during cyclic contractions. J Exp Biol 218(19):3150–3159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sefati S, Neveln ID, Roth E, Mitchell TRT, Snyder JB, MacIver MA, Fortune ES, Cowan NJ (2013) Mutually opposing forces during locomotion can eliminate the tradeoff between maneuverability and stability. PNAS 110(47):18798-18803

  • Shim JK, Latash ML et al (2003) Prehension synergies: trial-to-trial variability and hierarchical organization of stable performance. Exp Brain Res 152(2):173–184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl VA, Nichols TR (2011) Short-term effects of muscular denervation and fasciotomy on global limb variables during locomotion in the decerebrate cat. Cells Tissues Organs 193(5):325–335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Su JLS, Dingwell JB (2007) Dynamic stability of passive dynamic walking on an irregular surface. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 129(6):802–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5(11):1226–1235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toney ME, Chang YH (2013) Humans robustly adhere to dynamic walking principles by harnessing motor abundance to control forces. Exp Brain Res 231(4):433–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdaasdonk BW, Koopman HFJM et al (2009) Energy efficient walking with central pattern generators: from passive dynamic walking to biologically inspired control. Biol Cybern 101(1):49–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmink RJH, Nichols TR (2003) Distribution of heterogenic reflexes among the quadriceps and triceps surae muscles of the cat hind limb. J Neurophysiol 90(4):2310–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter DA (1980) Overall principle of lower-limb support during stance phase of gait. J Biomech 13(11):923–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yen JT, Chang Y-H (2010) Rate-dependent control strategies stabilize limb forces during human locomotion. J R Soc Interface 7(46):801–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yen JT, Auyang AG et al (2009) Joint-level kinetic redundancy is exploited to control limb-level forces during human hopping. Exp Brain Res 196(3):439–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelik KE, Huang TWP et al (2014) The role of series ankle elasticity in bipedal walking. J Theor Biol 346:75–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelik KE, Takahashi KZ, Sawicki GS (2015) Six degree-of-freedom analysis of hip, knee, ankle and foot provides updated understanding of biomechanical work during human walking. J Exp Biol 218(6):876–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NINDS 5R01NS069655 and NICHD 5T32HD055180. The authors are greatly indebted to Gregory S. Sawicki and Dominic James Farris for providing the original data from their publication in PNAS 2011. The authors would like to thank Jasper Yen for his thoughtful comments and for creating much of the original MATLAB code used in this analysis. We would also like to thank members of the Comparative Neuromechanics Lab for all their helpful feedback throughout the completion of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Hui Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toney, M.E., Chang, YH. The motor and the brake of the trailing leg in human walking: leg force control through ankle modulation and knee covariance. Exp Brain Res 234, 3011–3023 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4703-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4703-8

Keywords

Navigation