Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field independence (FI) has been defined as the extent to which the individual perceives part of a field as discrete from the surrounding field, rather than embedded in the field. It has been proposed to represent a relatively stable pattern in individuals’ predisposition towards information processing. In the present study, we assessed the effect of FI on skills underpinning human navigation. Fifty Healthy individuals took part in this study. FI has been assessed by using the group embedded figures test (GEFT). Participants were also asked to perform several visuo-spatial orientation tasks, including the perspective taking/spatial orientation test (PTSOT), the mental rotation task (MRT) and the vividness task, as well as the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale, a self-reported questionnaire, which has been found to predict environmental spatial orientation ability. We found that performances on the GEFT significantly predicted performances on the PTSOT and the MRT. This result supports the idea that FI predicts human navigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bednarek H, Truszczyński O, Wutke K (2013) Cognitive determinants of pilots’ effectiveness under a false horizon illusion. Int J Aviat Psychol 23(3):267–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini F, Incoccia C, Palermo L, Piccardi L, Zompanti L, Sabatini U, Guariglia C (2010) Developmental topographical disorientation in a healthy subject. Neuropsychologia 48(6):1563–1573. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini F, Palermo L, Piccardi L, Incoccia C, Nemmi F, Sabatini U, Guariglia C (2014) Where am i? A new case of developmental topographical disorientation. J Neuropsychol 8(1):107–124. doi:10.1111/jnp.12007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boccia M, Nemmi F, Guariglia C (2014) Neuropsychology of environmental navigation in humans: review and meta-analysis of FMRI studies in healthy participants. Neuropsychol Rev 24(2):236–251. doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9247-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coluccia E, Louse G (2004) Gender differences in spatial orientation: a review. J Environ Psychol 24:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom R, French J, Harman H, Dermen D (1976) Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests, vol 102. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, p 117. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506897102

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans C, Richardson JTE, Waring M (2013) Field independence: reviewing the evidence. Br J Educ Psychol 83:210–224. doi:10.1111/bjep.12015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlazzo F, Piccardi L, Burattini C, Barbalace M, Giannini AM, Bisegna F (2014) Effects of new light sources on task switching and mental rotation performance. J Environ Psychol 39:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogliani Messina TM, Fogliani AM, Di Nuovo S (1984) Dipendenza dal campo e stile cognitivo: gli Embedded figures tests di H. Witkin, P. K. Oltman, E. Raskin e S. A. Karp. Organizzazioni speciali, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay R (1977) Purdue spatial visualization tests. Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette

  • Halpern DF (2000) Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty M, Waller D (2004) A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence 32:175–191. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty M, Richardson AE, Montello DR, Lovelace K, Subbiah I (2002) Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30:425–447. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iaria G, Bogod N, Fox CJ, Barton JJ (2009) Developmental topographical disorientation: case one. Neuropsychologia 47(1):30–40. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen G, Jansen C, Van Turennout M (2008) Memory consolidation of landmarks in good navigators. Hippocampus 18:40–47. doi:10.1002/hipo.20364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karp SA (1963) Field dependence and overcoming embeddedness. J Consult Psychol 27:294–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M (2001) A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Mem Cognit 29:745–756. doi:10.3758/BF03200477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton CA (2010) Gender, spatial abilities and wayfinding. In: Chrisler JC, McGreary DR (eds) Handbook of gender research in psychology, vol. 1: gender research in general and experimental psychology. Springer, New York, pp 317–341

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitolo M, Gardini S, Caffarra P, Ronconi L, Venneri A, Pazzaglia F (2015) Relationship between spatial ability, visuospatial working memory and self-assessed spatial orientation ability: a study in older adults. Cogn Process 16:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR (1998) A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large-scale environments. In: Egenhofer MJ, Golledge RG (eds) Spatial and temporal reasoning in geographic information systems. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon D (1977) Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn Psychol 9:353–383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nori R, Piccardi L (2011) Familiarity and spatial cognitive style: how important are they for spatial representation? In: Thomas JB (ed) Spatial memory: visuospatial processes, cognitive performance and developmental effects. Nova Publisher, New York, pp 103–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Nori R, Piccardi L (2015) I believe I’m good at orienting myself… but is that true? Cogn Process 16:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nori R, Grandicelli S, Giusberti F (2006) Alignment effect: primary–secondary learning and cognitive styles. Perception 35:1233–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe J, Nadel L (1979) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oltman PK, Raskin E, Witkin HA (1971) Group embedded figures test. Consulting psychologists press, Palo Alto, CA

  • Palermo L, Nori R, Piccardi L, Zeri F, Babino A, Giusberti F, Guariglia C (2013) Refractive errors affect the vividness of visual mental images. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065161

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccardi L, Bianchini F, Iasevoli L, Giannone G, Guariglia C (2011a) Sex differences in a landmark environmental re-orientation task only during the learning phase. Neurosci Lett 503(3):181–185. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piccardi L, Risetti M, Nori R (2011b) Familiarity and environmental representations of a city: a self-report study. Psychol Rep 109:309–326. doi:10.2466/01.13.17.PR0.109.4.309-326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piccardi L, Risetti M, Nori R, Tanzilli A, Bernardi L, Guariglia C (2011c) Perspective changing in primary and secondary learning: a gender difference study. Learn Individ Differ 21:114–118. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poirel N, Pineau A, Jobard G, Mellet E (2008) Seeing the forest before the trees depends on individual field-dependency characteristics. Exp Psychol 55:328–333. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prestopnik JL, Roskos-Ewoldsen B (2000) The relations among wayfinding strategy use, sense of direction, sex familiarity and wayfinding ability. J Environ Psychol 20(2):177–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0160

  • Price-Williams D (1988) Social/cultural anthropology: on the edge of the forest: cultural adaptation and cognitive development in Central Africa. JW Berry, JMH van de Koppel, C Sénéchal, RC Annis, S Bahuchet, LL Cavalli-Sforza, and HA Witkin. Am Anthropol 90:714–715. doi:10.1525/aa.1988.90.3.02a00430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholl MJ, Acacio JC, Makar RO, Leon C (2000) The relation of sex and sense of direction to spatial orientation in an unfamiliar environment. J Environ Psychol 20(1):17–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0146

  • Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments, vol 10. Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi Y (1992) Sense of direction and its relationship with geographical orientation, personality traits and mental ability. Jpn J Educ Psychol 40:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verde P, Piccardi L, Bianchini F, Trivelloni P, Guariglia C, Tomao E (2013) Gender effects on mental rotation in pilots vs. nonpilots. Aviat Space Environ Med 84(7):726–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter E, Dassonville P (2011) Activation in a frontoparietal cortical network underlies individual differences in the performance of an embedded figures task. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020742

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegman J, Fonteijn HM, van Ekert J, Tyborowska A, Jansen C, Janzen G (2014) Gray and white matter correlates of navigational ability in humans. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2561–2572. doi:10.1002/hbm.22349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willey CR, Jackson RE (2014) Visual field dependence as a navigational strategy. Atten Percept Psychophys 76(4):1036–1044. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0639-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin HA (1967) A cognitive-style approach to cross-cultural research1. Int J Psychol 2:233–250. doi:10.1080/00207596708247220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin HA (1977) Cognitive style in personal and cultural adaptation. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications, vol 47. Clark university press, Worcester, MA, pp 1–64

  • Witkin HA, Oltman PK, Raskin E, Karp S (1971) A manual for the embedded figures test. Consulting psychologists press, Palo Alto, CA

  • Wolbers T, Hegarty M (2010) What determines our navigational abilities? Trends Cognit Sci 14:138–146. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy

    Maddalena Boccia, Luigi Pizzamiglio & Cecilia Guariglia

  2. Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy

    Maddalena Boccia, Laura Piccardi, Luigi Pizzamiglio & Cecilia Guariglia

  3. Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, L’Aquila University, L’Aquila, Italy

    Laura Piccardi & Mariangela Di Marco

Authors
  1. Maddalena Boccia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Piccardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariangela Di Marco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luigi Pizzamiglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cecilia Guariglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maddalena Boccia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boccia, M., Piccardi, L., Di Marco, M. et al. Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence. Exp Brain Res 234, 2799–2807 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4682-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4682-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation