Abstract
The memory for the final position of a moving object which suddenly disappears has been found to be displaced forward, in the direction of motion, and downwards, in the direction of gravity. These phenomena were coined, respectively, Representational Momentum and Representational Gravity. Although both these and similar effects have been systematically linked with the functioning of internal representations of physical variables (e.g. momentum and gravity), serious doubts have been raised for a cognitively based interpretation, favouring instead a major role of oculomotor and perceptual factors which, more often than not, were left uncontrolled and even ignored. The present work aims to determine the degree to which Representational Momentum and Representational Gravity are epiphenomenal to smooth pursuit eye movements. Observers were required to indicate the offset locations of targets moving along systematically varied directions after a variable imposed retention interval. Each participant completed the task twice, varying the eye movements’ instructions: gaze was either constrained or left free to track the targets. A Fourier decomposition analysis of the localization responses was used to disentangle both phenomena. The results show unambiguously that constraining eye movements significantly eliminates the harmonic components which index Representational Momentum, but have no effect on Representational Gravity or its time course. The found outcomes offer promising prospects for the study of the visual representation of gravity and its neurological substrates.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amorim MA, Lang W, Lindinger G, Mayer D, Deecke L, Berthoz A (2000) Modulation of spatial orientation by mental imagery: a MEG study of representational momentum. J Cogn Neurosci 12:569–582
Angelaki DE, Shaikh AG, Green AM, Dickman JD (2004) Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion. Nature 430:560–564
Bahill AT, Stark L (1975) Neurological control of horizontal and vertical components of oblique saccadic eye movements. Math Biosci 27:287–298
Baloh RW, Yee RD, Honrubia V, Jacobson K (1988) A comparison of the dynamics of horizontal and vertical smooth pursuit in normal human subjects. Aviat Space Environ Med 59:121–124
Bennett SJ, Barnes GR (2004) Predictive smooth ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of a visual target. J Neurophysiol 92:578–590
Berry MJ, Brivanlou IH, Jordan TA, Meister M (1999) Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398:334–338
Bertamini M (1993) Memory for position and dynamic representation. Mem Cogn 21:449–457
Bosco G, Carrozzo M, Lacquaniti F (2008) Contributions of the human temporoparietal junction and MT/V5 + to the timing of interception revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci 28:12071–12084
Bosco G, Monache S, Gravano S, Indovina I, La Scaleia B, Maffei V, Zago M, Lacquaniti F (2015) Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture. Front Integr Neurosci 9:13
De Sá Teixeira N (2014) Fourier decomposition of spatial localization errors reveals an idiotropic dominance of an internal model of gravity. Vision Res 105:177–188
De Sá Teixeira NA (2016) How fast do objects fall in visual memory? Uncovering the temporal and spatial features of representational gravity. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0148953
De Sá Teixeira NA, Hecht H (2014a) The dynamic representation of gravity is suspended when the idiotropic vector is misaligned with gravity. J Vestib Res 24:267–279
De Sá Teixeira NA, Hecht H (2014b) Can representational trajectory reveal the nature of an internal model of gravity? Atten Percept Psychophys 76:1106–1120
De Sá Teixeira NA, Oliveira AM (2014) Spatial and foveal biases, not perceived mass or heaviness, explain the effect of target size on representational momentum and representational gravity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 40:1664–1679
De Sá Teixeira NA, Hecht H, Oliveira AM (2013) The representational dynamics of remembered projectile locations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 39:1690–1699
Diaz G, Cooper J, Hayhoe M (2013) Memory and prediction in natural gaze control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:1628
Eggert T, Ladda J, Straube A (2009) Inferring the future trajectory from visual context: is visual background structure used for anticipatory smooth pursuit? Exp Brain Res 196:205–215
Freyd JJ (1983) The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Percept Psychophys 33:575–581
Freyd JJ (1987) Dynamic mental representations. Psychol Rev 94:427–438
Freyd JJ (1993) Five hunches about perceptual processes and dynamic representations. In: Meyer D, Kornblum S (eds) Attention and performance XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge
Freyd JJ, Finke RA (1984) Representational momentum. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 10:126–132
Freyd JJ, Johnson JQ (1987) Probing the time course of representational momentum. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 13:259–269
Freyd JJ, Pantzer TM, Cheng JL (1988) Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. J Exp Psychol Gen 117:395–407
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Grush R (2005) Internal models and the construction of time: generalizing from state estimation to trajectory estimation to address temporal features of perception, including temporal illusions. J Neural Eng 2:S209–S218
Hubbard TL (1990) Cognitive representation of linear motion: possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Mem Cogn 18:299–309
Hubbard TL (1993) The effects of context on visual representational momentum. Mem Cogn 21:103–114
Hubbard TL (1995) Cognitive representation of motion: evidence for friction and gravity analogues. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21:241–254
Hubbard TL (1996) Representational momentum, centripetal force, and curvilinear impetus. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:1049–1060
Hubbard TL (1997) Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 23:1484–1493
Hubbard TL (2005) Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: a review of the findings. Psychon Bull Rev 12:822–851
Hubbard TL (2006) Computational theory and cognition in representational momentum and related types of displacement: a reply to Kerzel. Psychon Bull Rev 13:174–177
Hubbard TL (2014) Forms of momentum across space: representational, operational, and attentional. Psychon Bull Rev 21:1371–1403
Hubbard TL (2015) The varieties of momnentum-like experience. Psychological Bulletin 141(6):1081–1119
Hubbard TL, Bharucha JJ (1988) Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Percept Psychophys 44:211–221
Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE (1999) Representational momentum and landmark attraction effects. Can J Exp Psychol 53:242–256
Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE (2000) Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychol Res 64:41–55
Ke SR, Lam J, Pai DK, Spering M (2013) Directional asymmetries in human smooth pursuit eye movements. Investig Ophtalmol Vis Sci 54:4409–4421
Kerzel D (2000) Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Res 40:3703–3715
Kerzel D (2002a) A matter of design: no representational momentum with predictability. Vis Cogn 9:66–80
Kerzel D (2002b) The locus of “memory displacement” is at least partially perceptual: effects of velocity, expectation, friction, memory averaging, and weight. Percept Psychophys 64:680–692
Kerzel D (2003a) Centripetal force draws the eyes, not memory of the target, toward the center. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:458–466
Kerzel D (2003b) Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses. Vision Res 43:2623–2635
Kerzel D (2006) Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on “representational momentum”. Psychon Bull Rev 13:166–173
Kerzel D, Jordan JS, Müsseler J (2001) The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:829–840
Kourtzi Z, Nakayama K (2002) Distinct mechanisms for the representation of moving and static objects. Vis Cogn 9:248–264
Kowler E (1989) Cognitive expectations, not habits, control anticipatory smooth oculomotor pursuit. Vision Res 29:1049–1057
La Scaleia B, Lacquaniti F, Zago M (2014) Neural extrapolation of motion for a ball rolling down an inclined plane. PLoS ONE 9:e99837
La Scaleia B, Zago M, Lacquaniti F (2015) Hand interception of occluded motion in humans: a test of model-based vs. on-line control. J Neurophysiol 114:1577–1592
Lacquaniti F, Bosco G, Indovina I, La Scaleia B, Maffei V, Moscatelli A, Zago M (2013) Visual gravitational motion and the vestibular system in humans. Front Integr Neurosci 7:101
Lacquaniti F, Bosco G, Gravano S, Indovina I, La Scaleia B, Maffei V, Zago M (2014) Multisensory integration and internal models for sensing gravity effects in primates. BioMed Res Int 2014
Ladda J, Eggert T, Glasauer S, Straube A (2007) Velocity scaling of cue induced smooth pursuit acceleration obeys constraints of natural motion. Exp Brain Res 182:343–356
Mitrani L, Dimitrov G (1978) Pursuit eye movements of a disappearing moving target. Vision Res 18:537–539
Motes MA, Hubbard TL, Courtney JR, Rypma B (2008) A principal components analysis of dynamic spatial memory biases. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:1076–1083
O’Reagan JK, Nöe A (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 24:939–1031
Poon C, Merfeld DM (2005) Internal models: the state of the art (Editorial for special issue: Sensory integration, state estimation, and motor control in the brain: role of internal models). J Neural Eng 2
Rao H, Han S, Jiang Y, Xue Y, Gu H, Cui Y, Gao D (2004) Engagement of the prefrontal cortex in representational momentum: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 23:98–103
Robinson DA, Gordon JL, Gordon SE (1986) A Model of the smooth pursuit eye movement system. Biological Cybernetics 55:43–57
Rottach KG, Zivotofsky AZ, Das VE, Averbuch-Heller L, DiScenna AO, Poonyalathang A, Leigh RJ (1996) Comparison of horizontal, vertical and diagonal smooth pursuit eye movements in normal human subjects. Vision Res 36:2189–2195
Sekuler R, Armstrong R (1978) Fourier analysis of polar coordinate data in visual physiology and psychophysics. Behav Res Methods Instrum 10:8–14
Senior C, Barnes J, Giampietro V, Brammer M, Bullmore E, Simmons A, David AS (2000) The functional neuroanatomy of implicit motion perception or ‘representational momentum’. Curr Biol 10:16–22
Senior C, Ward J, David AS (2002) Representational momentum and the brain: an investigation into the functional necessity of V5/MT. Vis Cogn 9:81–92
Shepard RN (1984) Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychol Rev 91:417–447
Sheth BR, Shimojo S (2001) Compression of space in visual memory. Vision Res 41:329–341
Snyder L (1999) This way up: illusions and the internal models in the vestibular system. Nat Neurosci 2:396–398
Tin C, Poon C-S (2005) Internal models in sensorimotor integration: perspectives from adaptive control theory. J Neural Eng 2:S147–S163
von Helmholtz H (1867) Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leopold Voss, Leipzig
Zago M, McIntyre J, Senot P, Lacquaniti F (2008) Internal models and prediction of visual gravitational motion. Vision Res 48:1532–1538
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Grant SFRH/BPD/84118/2012 by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Sá Teixeira, N.A. The visual representations of motion and of gravity are functionally independent: Evidence of a differential effect of smooth pursuit eye movements. Exp Brain Res 234, 2491–2504 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4654-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4654-0