Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Passive perceptual learning versus active searching in a novel stimuli vigilance task

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A criticism of laboratory vigilance or sustained attention research is the employment of static monotonous tasks with repetitive targets as opposed to the use of dynamic tasks with novel target stimuli. Unfortunately dynamic tasks employing novel stimuli may result in the mixture of two cognitive processes: active sustained attention search and passive perceptual learning. Moreover, the relative engagement of these two processes may depend on individual differences. In the present study, we examined this by having participants perform a dynamic auditory vigilance task with rare novel targets. In addition, some participants performed this task while also performing a secondary motor tracking task, a dual-task scenario. In the dual-task scenario, participants who failed to accurately detect the first target stimuli showed improvements in their tracking performance with time-on-task, suggesting reserves of attention. This improvement in tracking performance was not evident for those who accurately detected the first target stimuli, as their attention was likely actively engaged (searching). In addition, participants in the dual-task scenario who accurately detected the first target stimuli reported high workload and increased post-task tense arousal, results characteristic of participants performing static vigilance tasks. These results indicate the possibility that in a dynamic vigilance task with novel target stimuli participants may diverge in how they approach the task. Some participants will actively monitor the display for targets (search), whereas others will passively learn the target stimuli. Thus, these tasks may pose significant challenges to researchers who wish to examine vigilance in isolation from perceptual learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonnefond A, Doignon-Camus N, Touzalin-Chretien P, Dufour A (2010) Vigilance and intrinsic maintenance of alert state: an ERP study. Behav Brain Res 211:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter L, Russell PN, Helton WS (2013) Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain Cogn 82:35–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Joux N, Russell PN, Helton WS (2013) A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of sustained attention to local and global target features. Brain Cogn 81:370–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dillard MB, Warm JS, Funke GJ, Funke ME, Finomore VS, Matthews G, Parasuraman R (2014) The sustained attention to response task (SART) does not promote mindlessness during vigilance performance. Hum Factors. doi:10.1177/0018720814537521

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorrian J, Roach GD, Fletcher A, Dawson D (2007) Simulated train driving: fatigue, self-awareness, and cognitive disengagement. Appl Ergon 38:155–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C (1993) The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 100:363–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esterman M, Reagan A, Liu G, Turner C, DeGutis J (2014) Reward reveals dissociable aspects of sustained attention. J Exp Psychol Gen 143:2287–2295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finomore VS, Matthews G, Shaw T, Warm JS (2009) Predicting vigilance: a fresh look at an old problem. Ergonomics 52:791–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock (2013) In search of vigilance: the problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. Am Psychol 68:97–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SG, Straveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Oxford, pp 139–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkey DJC, Amitay S, Moore DR (2004) Early and rapid perceptual learning. Nat Neurosci 7:1055–1056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Head J, Helton WS (2012) Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention. Conscious Cogn 21:1617–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS (2010) The relationship between lateral difference in tympanic membrane temperature and behavioural impulsivity. Brain Cogn 74:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2012) Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused. Exp Brain Res 219:37–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Russell PN (2015) Rest is best: the role of rest and task interruptions on vigilance. Cognition 134:165–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Hollander TD, Tripp LD, Parsons K, Warm JS, Matthews G, Dember WN (2007) The abbreviated vigilance task and cerebral hemodynamics. J Clinc Exp Neuropychol 29:545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Hayrynen L, Schaffer D (2009a) Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: performance and tympanic membrane temperature. Exp Brain Res 71:9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Kern RP, Walker DR (2009b) Tympanic membrane temperature, exposure to emotional stimuli and the sustained attention to response task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:611–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helton WS, Warm JS, Tripp LD, Matthews G, Parasuraman R, Hancock P (2010) Cerebral lateralization of vigilance: a function of task difficulty. Neuropsychologia 48:1683–1688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock EM, Warm JS, Matthews G, Dember WN, Shear PK, Tripp LD, Mayleben DW, Parasuraman R (2003) Automation cueing modulates cerebral blood flow and vigilance in a simulated air traffic control task. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 4:89–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughson AL, Boakes RA (2009) Passive perceptual learning in relation to wine: short-term recognition and verbal description. Q J Exp Psychol 62:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kursban K, Duckworth A, Kable JW, Myers J (2013) An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav Brain Sci 36:661–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langner RL, Eickhoff SB (2013) Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychol Bull 139:870–900

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Wu WC, Wang J, Detre JA, Dinges DF, Rao H (2010) Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: an ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect. Neuroimage 49:3429–3435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim J, Quevenco FC, Kwok K (2013) EEG alpha activity is associated with individual differences in post-break improvement. Neuroimage 76:81–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth NH (1948) The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 1:6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly T, Robertson IH, Galloway M, Hawkins K (1999) The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia 37:661–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manly T, Heutink J, Davison B, Gaynord B, Greenfield E, Parr A, Rideway V, Robertson IH (2004) An electronic knot in the handkerchief: “Content free cueing” and the maintenance of attentive control. Neuropsychol Rehabil 14:86–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G, Campbell SE, Falconer S, Joyner LA, Huggins J, Gilliand K (2002) Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engragement, distress, and worry. Emotion 2:315–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews G, Warm JS, Reinerman-Jones LE, Lanheim LK, Washburn DA, Tripp L (2010) Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. J Exp Psychol Appl 16:187–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntire LK, McKinley A, Goodyear C, Nelson J (2014) A comparison of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and caffeine on vigilance and cognitive performance during extended wakefulness. Brain Stimul 7:499–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mukai IK, Kim D, Fukunaga M, Japee S, Marrett S, Ugerleider LG (2007) Activations in visual and attention-related areas predict and correlate with the degree of perceptual learning. J Neurosci 27:11401–11411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mukai I, Bahadur K, Ungerleider LG (2011) Exogenous and endogenous attention during perceptual learning differently affect post-training target thresholds. J Vis 11:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson JT, McKinley RA, Golob EJ, Warm JS, Parasuraman R (2014) Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuroimage 85:909–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell RG, Bellgrove MA, Dockree PM, Robertson IA (2006) Cognitive remediation in ADHD: effects of periodic non-contingent alerts on sustained attention to response. Neuropsychol Rehabil 16:653–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ong M, Russell PN, Helton WS (2013) Frontal cerebral oxygen response as an indicator of initial attention effort during perceptual learning. Exp Brain Res 229:517–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossowski U, Malinen S, Helton WS (2011) The effects of emotional stimuli on target detection: indirect and direct resource costs. Conscious Cogn 20:1649–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman R, Davies DR (1977) A taxonomic analysis of vigilance. In: Mackie RR (ed) Vigilance: theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates. Plenum, New York, pp 559–574

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poggio T, Fahle M, Edelman S (1992) Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity. Science 256:1018–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J (1997) ‘Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 34:747–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinette RL, Ha JC (2000) Social and ecological factors influencing vigilance by northwestern crows, Corvus carinus. Anim Behav 62:447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross HA, Russell PN, Helton WS (2014) Effects of breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement. Exp Brain Res 232:1729–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satchell PM (1993) Cockpit monitoring and alerting systems. Ashgate, Brookfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz AR, Dinse HR (2007) A common framework for perceptual learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:148–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen M, Hamalainen J, Pesonen AK, Tervaniemi M (2013) Passive sound exposure induces rapid perceptual learning in musicians: event-related potential evidence. Biol Psychol 94:341–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw T, Warm JS, Finomore V, Tripp L, Mattews G, Weiler E et al (2009) Effects of sensory modality on cerebral blood flow velocity during vigilance. Neurosci Lett 461:207–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw T, Finomore V, Warm J, Mattews G (2012) Effects of regular or irregular even schedules on cerebral hemovelocity during sustained attention task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 34:57–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw T, Satterfield K, Ramirez R, Finomore V (2013) Using cerebral hemovelocity to measure workload during a spatialized auditory vigilance task in novice and experienced observers. Ergonomics 56:1251–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staub B, Doignon-Camus N, Bacon E, Bonnefond A (2014) Investigating sustained attention ability in the elderly by using two different approaches: inhibiting ongoing behavior versus responding on rare occasions. Acta Psychol 146:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson H, Russell PN, Helton WS (2011) Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain Cogn 77:215–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szalma JL (2008) Individual differences in stress reaction. In: Hancock PA, Szalma JL (eds) Performance under stress. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 323–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalma JL, Schmidt TN, Teo GW, Hancock PA (2014) Vigilance on the move: video game-based measurement of sustained attention. Ergonomics 57:1315–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warm JS, Parasuraman R, Matthews G (2008) Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Hum Factors 50:433–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Nanez JE, Sasaki Y (2001) Perceptual learning without perception. Nature 413:844–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Nanez JE, Koyama S, Mukai I, Liederman J, Sasak Y (2002) Greater plasticity in lower-level than higher-level visual motion processing in a passive perceptual learning task. Nat Neurosci 5:1003–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT (1968) Fundamentals of skill. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (2008) Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors 50:449–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens C, Kramer A, Vanasse L, Donchin E (1983) Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science 221:1080–1082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins MW (2010) Vigilance decrement during a simulated general aviation flight. Appl Cogn Psychol 25:229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins M, O’Hare D (2003) Weatherwise: evaluation of a cue-based training approach for the recognition of deteriorating weather conditions during flight. Hum Factors 45:337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KM, Head J, Helton WS (2013) Friendly fire in a simulated firearms task. Proc Hum Fact Ergon Soc 57:1244–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, RDRL-HRS-E, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA

    James Head

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

    William S. Helton

Authors
  1. James Head
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William S. Helton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William S. Helton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Head, J., Helton, W.S. Passive perceptual learning versus active searching in a novel stimuli vigilance task. Exp Brain Res 233, 1481–1489 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4222-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4222-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation