Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been proposed that the two hands play different roles during bimanual object interaction. The right hand takes on an explorative, highly precise, manipulative role while the left hand supports and stabilizes the object. Does this division of labour influence hand use during visually guided grasping? Three experiments were designed to address this question: right-handed individuals put together 3D models using big or small building blocks scattered across a tabletop. Participants were free to build the models; however, it felt comfortable (Experiment 1) or they were required to build on a large (Experiment 2) or small (Experiment 3) base plate. In Experiment 1, the right hand was preferred for grasping while the left hand stabilized the building model. When participants used the large base plate (Experiment 2), right hand use for grasping decreased and left hand use increased. The plate provided freedom to the left hand from having to stabilize the building model, but it also interfered with right/left hand movements directed towards the opposite side of the grasping hand (contralateral movements). To investigate which of these two factors would explain the change in hand use for grasping, a very small base plate was used in the last experiment. Results showed similar right hand use values to those seen in the first experiment (without the use of a plate), even though the left hand was ‘released from its stabilizing duties.’ The results predict a left-hemisphere right hand advantage in the control of grasping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annett J, Annett M, Hudson PTW, Turner A (1979) The control of movement in the preferred and the non-preferred hands. Q J Exp Psychol 31:641–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolomeo P (2006) A parietofrontal network for spatial awareness in the right hemisphere of the human brain. Arch Neurol 63:1238–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Begliomini C, Nelini C, Caria A, Grodd W, Castiello U (2008) Cortical activations in humans grasp-related areas depend on hand used and handedness. PLoS ONE 3(10):e3388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birtles D, Anker S, Atkinson J, Shellens R, Briscoe A, Mahoney M, Braddick O (2011) Bimanual strategies for object retrieval in infants and young children. Exp Brain Res 211:207–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop DVM (1996) The measurement of hand preference: a validation study comparing three groups of right-handers. Br J Psychol 81:269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Roy E, Rohr L, Bryden P (2006) Using hand performance measures to predict handedness. Laterality 11:1–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryden PJ, Roy EA (2006) Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. Dev Psychobiol 48:121–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryden MP, Singh M, Steenhuis R, Clarkson KL (1994) A behavioral measure of hand preference as opposed to hand skill. Neuropsychologia 32:991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham G, Binsted G, Carey DP (2010) Bimanual reaching across the hemispace: which hand is yoked to which? Brain Cogn 74:341–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert GA, Bishop DV (1998) Quantifying hand preference using a behavioural continuum. Laterality 3:255–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlier M, Doyen A-L, Lamard C (2006) Midline crossing: developmental trend from 3 to 10 years of age in a preferential card-reaching task. Brain Cogn 61:255–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fagard J, Lockman J (2005) The effect of task constraints on infants’ (bi)manual strategy for grasping and exploring objects. Infant Behav Dev 28:305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagard J, Marks A (2000) Unimanual and bimanual tasks and the assessment of handedness in toddlers. Dev Sci 3:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flament F (1975) Coordination et prevalence manuelle chez le nourisson. Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard C, Rabb C (2000) What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements? J Gen Psychol 127:178–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard C, Iteya M, Rabb C (1997) A lateralized comparison of handedness and object proximity. J Gen Psychol 51:176–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard C, Tapia M, Helbig CR (2003) Task complexity and limb selection in reaching. Int J Neurosci 113:143–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez CL, Goodale MA (2009) Hand preference for precision grasping predicts language lateralization. Neuropsychologia 47:3182–3189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez CL, Ganel T, Goodale MA (2006) Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. J Neurophysiol 95:3496–3501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez CL, Whitwell RL, Morrissey B, Ganel T, Goodale MA (2007) Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping. Exp Brain Res 182:275–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale M (1988) Hemispheric asymmetries in motor control. Behav Brain Res 30:203–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guiard Y (1987) Assymetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav 19:486–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haaland KY, Prestopnik JL, Knighy RT, Lee RR (2004) Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain 127:1145–1158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins WD (1995) Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task in 110 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): cross-sectional analysis. J Comp Psychol 103:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Kritikos A (1999) Attention for action: coordination of bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. Br J Psychol 90:247–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen L, Meulenbrock RGJ, Steenbergen B (2011) Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning. Exp Brain Res 209:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Theorin A, Westling G, Andersson M, Ohki Y et al (2006) How a lateralized brain supports symmetrical bimanual tasks. PLoS Biol 4:e158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazennikov O, Perrig S, Wiesendanger M (2002) Kinematics of a coordinated goal-directed bimanual task. Behav Brain Res 134:83–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:229–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeilage PF (1987) The evolution of hemispheric specialization for manual function and language. In: Wise SP (ed) Higher brain functions. Wiley, New York, pp 285–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Bryden PJ, Rohr LE (2004) The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches. Brain Cogn 55:349–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Bryden PJ, Rohr LE (2005) The performance of left-handed participants on a preferential reaching test. Brain Cogn 57:143–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Rohr LE, Bryden PJ (2006) Reaching patterns across working space: the effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels. Laterality 11:465–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason A (2008) Coordination and control of bimanual prehension: effects of perturbing object location. Exp Brain Res 188:125–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrig S, Kazennikov O, Wiesendanger M (1999) Time structure of a goal-directed bimanual skill and its dependence on task constraints. Behav Brain Res 103:95–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogow SM (1987) The ways of the hand: a study of hand function among blind, visually impaired and visually impaired multi-handicapped children and adolescents. Br J Vis Impair 5:59–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacrey LR, Karl JM, Whishaw IQ (2012) Development of rotational movements, hand shaping, and accuracy in advance and withdrawal for the reach-to-eat movement in human infants aged 6 to 12 months. Infant Behav Dev 35:543–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Serrien DJ, Ivry RB, Swinnen SP (2006) Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:160–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuis RE, Bryden MP (1999) The relation between hand preference and hand performance: what you get depends on what you measure. Laterality 4:2–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Theorin A, Johansson RS (2010) Selection of prime actor in humans during bimanual object manipulation. J Neurosci 30:10448–10459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vallar G (1997) Spatial frames of reference and somatosensory processing: a neuropsychological perspective. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:1401–1409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel JL, Bowers CA, Vogel DS (2003) Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Brain Cogn 52:197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Sainburg RL (2007) The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance. Exp Brain Res 178:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Brain in Action Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, T1K 3M4, Canada

    Kayla D. Stone, Devon C. Bryant & Claudia L. R. Gonzalez

Authors
  1. Kayla D. Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Devon C. Bryant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Claudia L. R. Gonzalez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kayla D. Stone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stone, K.D., Bryant, D.C. & Gonzalez, C.L.R. Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?. Exp Brain Res 224, 455–467 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3325-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3325-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation