Abstract
Rationale: Despite an extensive body of research on the topography of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) little is known about the representation of the trunk. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the representation of the breast in S1 in human females. Results: The representation of the human breast in primary somatosensory cortex was determined in ten healthy female subjects. Non-painful electrical stimulation of the mammilla (Th4 dermatome), groin (L1 dermatome) and the first digit of both sides of the body activated cutaneous receptors and thus elicited somatosensory evoked potentials. The representation of these body parts in primary somatosensory cortex (S1) was determined using neuroelectric source imaging. Equivalent current dipole localizations were overlaid with individual structural magnetic resonance images to account for individual cortical differences. The breast representation was localized between the representation of the groin and the first digit. In the medial–lateral direction the representation of the breast was approximately 15 mm lateral of the longitudinal fissure in the contralateral hemisphere. Source localizations were stable across subjects. However, one subject showed ipsilateral representation of the breast, which might be related to bilateral receptive fields of the ventral body midline representation. This study confirms the Penfield and Rasmussen (1950) invasive data by use of noninvasive source imaging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumgartner C, Doppelbauer A, Sutherling WW, Lindinger G, Levesque MF, Aull S, Zeitlhofer J, Deecke L (1993) Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex as studied in scalp EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:271–279
Baumgartner U, Vogel H, Ellrich J, Gawehn J, Stoeter P, Treede RD (1998) Brain electrical source analysis of primary cortical components of the tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential using regional sources. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:588–599
Brunia CH, Van den Bosch WE (1984) Movement-related slow potentials. I. A contrast between finger and foot movements in right-handed subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 57:515–527
Conti F, Fabri M, Manzoni T (1986) Bilateral receptive fields and callosal connectivity of the body midline representation in the first somatosensory area of primates. Somatosens Res 3:273–289
Elbert T, Flor H, Birbaumer N, Knecht S, Hampson S, Larbig W, Taub E (1994) Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport 5:2593–2597
Felleman DJ, Nelson RJ, Sur M, Kaas JH (1983) Representation of the body surface in areas 3b and 1 of postcentral parietal cortex of cebus monkeys. Brain Res 268:15–26
Forss N, Salmelin R, Hari R (1994) Comparison of somatosensory evoked fields to airpuff and electric stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92:510–517
Gallen CC, Schwartz B, Rieke K, Pantev C, Sobel D, Hirschkoff E, Bloom FE (1994) Intrasubject reliability and validity of somatosensory source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90:145–156
Hari R, Karhu J, Hämäläinen M, Knuutila J, Salonen O, Sams M, Vilkman V (1993) Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: a neuromagnetic study. Eur J Neurosci 5:724–734
Hari R, Nagamine R, Nishitani N, Mikuni N, Sato T, Tarkiainen A, Shibasaki H (1996) Time-varying activation of different cytoarchitectonic areas of the human S1 cortex after tibial nerve stimulation. Neuroimage 4:111–118
Hashimoto I, Gatayama T, Yoshikawa K, Sasaki M (1992) Somatosensory evoked potential correlates of psychophysical magnitude estimations for air-puff stimulation of the face in man. Exp Brain Res 88:639–644
Itomi K, Kakigi R, Maeda K, Hoshiyama M (2000) Dermatome versus homunculus; detailed topography of the primary somatosensory cortex following trunk stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 111:405–412
Leahy RM, Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Huang MX, Lewine JD (1998) A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 107:159–173
McCarthy G, Allison T, Spencer DD (1993) Localization of the face area of human sensorimotor cortex by intracranial recording of somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurosurg 79:874–884
Mosher JC, Leahy RM (1998) Recursive MUSIC: A framework for EEG and MEG source localization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:1342–1354
Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM (1992) Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 39:541–557
Nakamura A, Yamada T, Goto A, Kato T, Ito K, Abe Y, Kachi T, Kakigi R (1998) Somatosensory homunculus drawn by MEG. Neuroimage 7:377–386
Nelson RN, Sur M, Felleman DJ, Kaas JH (1980) Representations of the body surface in postcentral parietal cortex of Macaca fascicularis. J Comp Neurol 192:611–643
Penfield W, Boldrey E (1937) Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389–443
Penfield W, Rasmussen T (1950) The cerebral cortex of man: a clinical study of localization of function. Macmillan, New York
Rosselet C, Xerri C, Zennou-Azogui Y (2004) Time course of cortical map remodelling induced by nursing behavior: receptive field sizes change more rapidly than receptive field locations. FENS Abstr 2:A225.12
Rothemund Y, Qi H-X, Collins CE, Kaas JH (2002) The genitals and gluteal skin are represented lateral to the foot in anterior parietal somatosensory cortex of macaques. Somatosens Mot Res 19:302–315
Rothemund Y, Grüsser SM, Schaefer M, Flor H (2004) Representation of the human female breast in primary somatosensory cortex. FENS Abstr 2:A225.13
Schaefer M, Mühlnickel W, Grüsser SM, Flor H (2002) Reliability and validity of neuroelectric source imaging in primary somatosensory cortex of human upper limb amputees. Brain Topogr 15:95–106
Sutherling WW, Crandall PH, Darcey TM, Becker DP, Levesque MF, Barth DS (1988) The magnetic and electric fields agree with intracranial localizations of somatosensory cortex. Neurology 38:1705–1714
Taoka M, Toda T, Iwamura Y (1998) Representation of the midline trunk, bilateral arms, and shoulders in the monkey postcentral somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 123:315–322
Woolsey CN (1964) Cortical localization as defined by evoked potential and electrical stimulation studies. In: Schaltenbrand G, Woolsey CN (eds) Cerebral localization and organization. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison Milwaukee, pp17–26
Woolsey CN, Erickson TC, Gilson WE (1979) Localization in somatic sensory and motor areas of human cerebral cortex as determined by direct recording of evoked potentials and electrical stimulation. J Neurosurg 51:476–506
Xerri C, Stern JM, Merzenich MM (1994) Alterations of the cortical representation of the rat ventrum induced by nursing behavior. J Neurosci 14:1710–1721
Yang TT, Gallen CC, Schwartz BJ, Bloom FE (1993) Noninvasive somatosensory homunculus mapping in humans by using a large-array biomagnetometer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:3098–3102
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to Herta Flor (FL 156/25) and Boehringer Ingelheim Funds to Yvonne Rothemund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rothemund, Y., Schaefer, M., Grüsser, S.M. et al. Localization of the human female breast in primary somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 164, 357–364 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2257-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2257-2