Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative analysis of cow whole milk and whey powder adulteration percentage in goat and sheep milk products by isotopic dilution-ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop a method for quantification of cow’s whey and whole milk powder in goat or sheep milk products including infant formula. A ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was established for simultaneous quantification of four caseins and two major whey proteins by detecting their signature peptides, which were able to act as markers for differentiating goat or sheep from cow whey and whole milk powder in infant formulas. The signature peptides were screened based on the computational prediction by Biolynx software, and confirmed by database searching after analysis of liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (LC-Q-TOF-MS). The isotopic-labeled signature peptide was used as internal standard to compensate the matrix effect. The limits of quantification were 0.01–0.05 g/100 g for target proteins. The observed recovery rates ranged from 82.3 to 116.6 % and the reproducibility was excellent (RSD <12 %) at different spiking levels. The RSDs of intra- and inter-day precision were 2.8–6.2 and 3.3–9.8 %, respectively. The multiple reaction monitoring method was successfully applied to milk powder with different composition, showing high specificity and accuracy in detection of species involved. The calculating formula was designed to assess the composition of adulteration in the actual detection of infant formulas. These results highlight applicability of this method for the detection of infant formulas with complicated matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Claeys WL, Cardoen S, Daube G, De Block J, Dewettinck K, Dierick K, et al. Raw or heated cow milk consumption: review of risks and benefits. Food Control. 2013;31:251–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. El-Agamy EI. The challenge of cow milk protein allergy. Small Rumin Res. 2007;68:64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballabio C, Chessa S, Rignanese D, Gigliotti C, Pagnacco G, Terracciano L, et al. Goat milk allergenicity as a function of alphas(1)-casein genetic polymorphism. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:998–1004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernandez-Ledesma B, Ramos M, Gomez-Ruiz JA. Bioactive components of ovine and caprine cheese whey. Small Rumin Res. 2011;101:196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grant C, Rotherham B, Sharpe S, Scragg R, Thompson J, Andrews J, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of growth in infants receiving goat milk formula versus cow milk infant formula. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41:564–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De la Fuente MA, Juarez M. Authenticity assessment of dairy products. Crit Rev Food Sci. 2005;45:563–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monaci L, Tregoat V, van Hengel AJ, Anklam E. Milk allergens, their characteristics and their detection in food: a review. Eur Food Res Technol. 2006;223:149–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maskova E, Paulickova I. PCR-based detection of cow’s milk in goat and sheep cheeses marketed in the Czech Republic. Czech J Food Sci. 2006;24:127–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Golinelli LP, Carvalho AC, Casaes RS, Lopes CS, Deliza R, Paschoalin VM, et al. Sensory analysis and species-specific PCR detect bovine milk adulteration of frescal (fresh) goat cheese. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:6693–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Veloso AC, Teixeira N, Ferreira IM. Separation and quantification of the major casein fractions by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Detection of milk adulterations. J Chromatogr A. 2002;967:209–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayer HK. Milk species identification in cheese varieties using electrophoretic, chromatographic and PCR techniques. Int Dairy J. 2005;15:595–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaminaridesa SE, Koukiassa P. Detection of bovine milk in ovine yoghurt by electrophoresis of para-kappa-casein. Food Chem. 2002;78:53–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pesic M, Barac M, Vrvic M, Ristic N, Macej O, Stanojevic S. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of bovine milk adulteration in caprine and ovine milks using native-PAGE. Food Chem. 2011;125:1443–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang Y, Zheng N, Yang J, Bu D, Wang J, Ma L, et al. Animal species milk identification by comparison of two-dimensional gel map profile and mass spectrometry approach. Int Dairy J. 2014;35:15–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez-Nogales JM, Vazquez F. Application of electrophoretic and chemometric analysis to predict the bovine, ovine and caprine milk percentages in Panela cheese, an unripened cheese. Food Control. 2007;18:580–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Song HX, Xue HY, Han Y. Detection of cow’s milk in Shaanxi goat’s milk with an ELISA assay. Food Control. 2011;22:883–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hurley IP, Ireland HE, Coleman RC, Williams JHH. Application of immunological methods for the detection of species adulteration in dairy products. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2004;39:873–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen RK, Chang LW, Chung YY, Lee MH, Ling YC. Quantification of cow milk adulteration in goat milk using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004;18:1167–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernardi N, Benetti G, Haouet NM, Sergi M, Grotta L, Marchetti S, et al. A rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for unambiguous detection of different milk species employed in cheese manufacturing. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:8405–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sassi M, Arena S, Scaloni A. MALDI-TOF-MS platform for integrated proteomic and peptidomic profiling of milk samples allows rapid detection of food adulterations. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:6157–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolaou N, Xu Y, Goodacre R. MALDI-MS and multivariate analysis for the detection and quantification of different milk species. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;399:3491–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Q, Zhang J, Ke X, Lai S, Tao B, Yang J, et al. Quantification of bovine beta-casein allergen in baked foodstuffs based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam A. 2015;32:25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Park YW, Juarez M, Ramos M, Haenlein GFW. Physico-chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin Res. 2007;68:88–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chatterton DEW, Smithers G, Roupas P, Brodkorb A. Bioactivity of beta-lactoglobulin and alpha-lactalbumin—technological implications for processing. Int Dairy J. 2006;16:1229–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bronstrup M. Absolute quantification strategies in proteomics based on mass spectrometry. Expert Rev Proteomic. 2004;1:503–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vogt W. Oxidation of methionyl residues in proteins: tools, targets, and reversal. Free Radic Biol Med. 1995;18:93–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang J, Lai S, Cai Z, Chen Q, Huang B, Ren Y. Determination of bovine lactoferrin in dairy products by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based on tryptic signature peptides employing an isotope-labeled winged peptide as internal standard. Anal Chim Acta. 2014;829:33–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang J, Lai S, Zhang Y, Huang B, Li D, Ren Y. Multiple reaction monitoring-based determination of bovine alpha-lactalbumin in infant formulas and whey protein concentrates by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using tryptic signature peptides and synthetic peptide standards. Anal Chim Acta. 2012;727:47–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weimin Mo or Yiping Ren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ke, X., Zhang, J., Lai, S. et al. Quantitative analysis of cow whole milk and whey powder adulteration percentage in goat and sheep milk products by isotopic dilution-ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 409, 213–224 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9987-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9987-9

Keywords

Navigation