Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of 32 cathinone derivatives and other designer drugs in serum by comprehensive LC-QQQ-MS/MS analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, clandestine drug lab operators have attempted to bypass controlled substances laws and regulations with “designer” compounds chemically and pharmacologically similar to controlled substances. For example, “bath salts” have erupted onto the scene as “legal highs” containing cathinone analogs that have produced severe side effects in users worldwide. These products have sparked concern among law enforcement agencies, and emergency bans have been placed on the sale of such items. Despite the increasing number of designer drugs available, there are few comprehensive screening techniques for their detection and quantification in biological specimens. The liquid chromatography triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (LC-QQQ-MS/MS) method presented here encompasses over thirty important compounds within the phenethylamine, tryptamine, and piperazine designer drug classes. Analytes were determined by LC-QQQ-MS/MS in the multiple-reaction monitoring mode after mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. The bioanalytical method was fully validated according to recommended international guidelines. The assay was selective for all analytes with acceptable accuracy and precision. Limits of quantification were in the range of 1–10 ng/mL for each compound with limits of detection near 10 pg/mL. In order to evaluate its applicability in a forensic toxicological setting, the validated method was used to analyze post-mortem specimens from two cases that were suspected of containing designer drugs. The method was able to identify and quantify seven of these compounds at concentrations as low as 11 ng/mL. The method should have wide applicability for rapid screening of important new drugs of abuse at high sensitivity in both post- and ante-mortem forensic analysis.

LC-MS chromatogram (intensity vs. retention time) of primary MRM transitions for 32 targeted analytes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henderson GL (1988) J Forensic Sci 33:569–575

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll FI, Lewin AH, Mascarella SW, Seltzmann HH, Reddy PA (2012) Ann N Y Acad Sci 1248:18–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill SL, Thomas SHL (2011) Clin Toxicol 49:705–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coppola M, Mondola R (2012) Toxicol Lett 211:144–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wohlfarth A, Weinmann W (2010) Bioanalysis 2:965–979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McGrane O, Simmons J, Jacobson E, Skinner C (2011) J Clin Toxicol 1:2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prosser JM, Nelson LS (2012) J Med Toxicol 8:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boland DM, Andollo W, Hime GW, Hearn WL (2005) J Anal Toxicol 29:394–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanaka E, Kamata T, Katagi M, Tsuchihashi H, Honda K (2006) Forensic Sci Int 163:152–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Elliott S, Smith C (2008) J Anal Toxicol 32:172–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kölliker S, Oehme M (2004) Anal Bioanal Chem 378:1294–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Apollonio LG, Pianca DJ, Whittall IR, Maher WA, Kyd JM (2006) J Chromatogr B 836:111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Concheiro M, de Castro A, Quintela O, Cruz A, López-Rivadulla M (2007) J Anal Toxicol 31:573–580

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wohlfarth A, Weinmann W, Dresen S (2010) Anal Bioanal Chem 396:2403–2414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ammann D, McLaren JM, Gerostamoulos D, Beyer J (2012) J Anal Toxicol 36:381–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kerrigan S, Banuelos S, Perrella L, Hardy B (2011) J Anal Toxicol 35:459–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell C, George C, Kicman AT, Traynor A (2011) Drug Testing Anal 3:496–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sørensen LK (2011) J Chromatogr B 879:727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vorce SP, Sklerov JH (2004) J Anal Toxicol 28:407–410

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peters FT, Drummer OH, Musshoff F (2007) Forensic Sci Int 165:216–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM (2003) Anal Chem 75:3019–3030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Araujo P (2009) J Chromatogr B 877:2224–2234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peters FT, Remane D (2012) Anal Bioanal Chem 403:2155–2172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wieling J, Hendriks G, Tamminga WJ, Hempenius J, Mensink CK, Oosterhuis B, Jonkman JHG (1996) J Chromatogr A 730:381–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cohen BMZ, Butler R (2011) Int J Drug Policy 22:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Agilent Technologies for generously providing the LC-QQQ-MS instrumentation for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony P. DeCaprio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swortwood, M.J., Boland, D.M. & DeCaprio, A.P. Determination of 32 cathinone derivatives and other designer drugs in serum by comprehensive LC-QQQ-MS/MS analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 1383–1397 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6548-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6548-8

Keywords

Navigation