Skip to main content
Log in

Improving species-specific IDMS: the advantages of triple IDMS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Triple isotope dilution mass spectrometry (triple IDMS) has been applied for the first time on protein quantification, especially on transferrin. Transferrin as an acute phase protein is a marker for several inflammation processes in the human body. Therefore, in Germany, the accurate and precise measurement of this important analyte is required. In this work, a new approach to triple IDMS is described and compared to double IDMS. Also, complete uncertainty budgets for both methods were set up to demonstrate the ability of this method to be used as a reference procedure. The relative expanded uncertainty (k = 2) for triple IDMS (3.6 %) is smaller than the one for double IDMS (4.0 %). The content of transferrin found in the human serum reference material ERM-DA470k/IFCC ((2.41 ± 0.08) g/kg) with both methods was in good agreement with each other and with the certificate. For triple IDMS ((2.426 ± 0.086) g/kg) and for double IDMS ((2.317 ± 0.092) g/kg), transferrin was determined. Although triple IDMS is a little more time consuming compared to double IDMS, there is the advantage that the isotopic composition of the spike material does not have to be determined. This is very useful especially in case of a marginal isotopic enrichment in the spike or problems with the accurate measurement of the spike isotope ratio.

Using triple instead of double species-specific IDMS helps to reduce the uncertainty and improves the reliability of the results, especially in cases where an accurate determination of the spike isotope ratio is difficult or impossible, because the spike ratio cancels from the equation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bundesärztekammer (2010) Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung labormedizinischer Untersuchungen (Guideline for the quality assurance of laboratory medical investigations). Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 12

  2. de Gruyter (ed) (2007) Pschyrembel, klinisches Wörterbuch (clinical dictionary), 261st edn. Walther de Gruyter, Berlin

  3. Aubailly L, Ducbert AS, Danzé PM, Forzy G (2011) Clin Biochem 44:731–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Helander A, Fors M, Zarkrisson B (2001) Alcohol Alcohol 36(5):406–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu L, Wu J, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Ren GH (2008) J Chromatogr B 867(1):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Referenzlabor für Bioanalytik (bioanalytical reference laboratory), interlaboratory comparison: IG 1/12 http://www.dgkl-rfb.de. Accessed 21 May 2012

  7. Sargent M, Harrington C, Harte R (eds) (2002) Guidelines for achieving high accuracy in isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heumann, K (1988) In: Adams, R; van Grieken, R (eds) Inorganic mass spectrometry. Wiley, New York

  9. Rienitz O, Pramann A, Schiel D (2010) Int J Mass Spectrom 289:47–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rottmann L, Heumann K (1994) Fresenius J Anal Chem 350:221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heumann K, Rottmann L, Vogl J (1998) Spectrochim Acta B: Atom Spectrosc 53:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Swart C, Rienitz O, Schiel D (2011) Talanta 83:1544–1551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meija J, Mester Z (2008) Anal Chim Acta 607(2):115–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogl J (2012) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 26(3):275–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Milton MJT, Wang J (2002) Int J Mass Spectrom 218:63–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. del Castillo Busto M, Montes-Bayón M, Sans-Medel A (2006) Anal Chem 78(24):8218–8226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Watters RL Jr, Eberhardt KR, Beary ES, Fassett JD (1997) Metrologia 34:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. IRMM, Certificate of analysis ERM-DA470k/IFCC, accepted as ERM, Geel, July 2008

  19. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100

  20. Vogl, J (2005) In: Nelms, SM (ed) Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry handbook. Blackwell, Oxford

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Frank.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection Metallomics with guest editors Uwe Karst and Michael Sperling.

Appendix

Appendix

All symbols used in Eqs. 17 are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5 Meaning of the symbols used in Eqs. 17

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, C., Rienitz, O., Swart, C. et al. Improving species-specific IDMS: the advantages of triple IDMS. Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 1913–1919 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6315-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-6315-x

Keywords

Navigation