Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. II. Agonist-induced antinociception and antagonist-induced suppression of fluid consumption

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

In an animal model for vulnerability to drug abuse, rats that are more reactive to a novel environment (high responders, HRs) are more sensitive to behavioral effects of psychostimulants than are less reactive rats (low responders, LRs). In a companion article, we reported that HRs and LRs differ in sensitivity to morphine-induced locomotor sensitization.

Objective

We tested whether LRs and HRs also differ in sensitivity to opioid-induced antinociception and opioid antagonist-induced suppression of fluid consumption.

Methods

LRs and HRs were categorized based on motor responses to novelty during a 30-min session. Responses to nociceptive stimuli of varied intensities were measured using the tail-flick and hot-plate tests alone or following cumulative doses of morphine (1.0–12 mg/kg), buprenorphine (0.025–0.6 mg/kg), or etorphine (0.25–6.0 μg/kg). Potential changes in endogenous opioid-mediated reward systems were tested using naltrexone-induced (0.01–30 mg/kg) suppression of drinking either water following 24-h deprivation or sweetened condensed milk in a non-deprived state. These effects were further examined following 2 weeks of daily access to sweetened condensed milk.

Results

At the lowest stimulus intensity tested, HRs had significantly shorter tail-flick response latencies than LRs. Additionally, HRs were less responsive to cumulative doses of morphine than LRs. There were no overall group differences in the hot-plate test. Following 2 weeks of daily access to sweetened condensed milk, HRs were more sensitive to naltrexone-induced suppression of consumption.

Conclusions

Under the proper conditions, differences in sensitivity to opioid drugs between HRs and LRs at least partially extend to antinociceptive and appetitive reward systems and are suggestive of more extensive differences in phenotype. As with the effects of repeated morphine exposure on locomotor activity, the effect of repeated exposure to appetitive reward associated with sweetened milk appears to be more robust in LRs than HRs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JU, Paronis CA, Holtzman SG (1990) Assessment of relative intrinsic activity of mu-opioid analgesics in vivo by using beta-funaltrexamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255:1027–1032

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agmo A, Galvan A, Talamantes B (1995) Reward and reinforcement produced by drinking sucrose: two processes that may depend on different neurotransmitters. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 52:403–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardo MT, Donohew RL, Harrington NG (1996) Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav Brain Res 77:23–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bevins RA, Klebaur JE, Bardo MT (1997) Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats. Behav Pharmacol 8:113–123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan K, Roberts DC, Anisman H, Merali Z (2001) Individual differences in sucrose consumption in the rat: motivational and neurochemical correlates of hedonia. Psychopharmacology 157:269–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DR, Holtzman SG (1979) Suppression of deprivation-induced food and water intake in rats and mice by naloxone. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:567–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conway CM, Martinez J, Lytle LD (1998) Maturational changes in the thermal nociceptive responses of developing rats. Dev Psychobiol 33:47–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook CD, Barrett AC, Roach EL, Bowman JR, Picker MJ (2000) Sex-related differences in the antinociceptive effects of opioids: importance of rat genotype, nociceptive stimulus intensity, and efficacy at the mu opioid receptor. Psychopharmacology 150:430–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amour FE, Smith DL (1941) A method of determining loss of pain sensation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 72:74–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellu F, Piazza PV, Mayo W, Le Moal M, Simon H (1996) Novelty-seeking in rats-biobehavioral characteristics and possible relationship with the sensation-seeking trait in man. Neuropsychobiology 34:136–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deroche V, Piazza PV, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Individual differences in the psychomotor effects of morphine are predicted by reactivity to novelty and influenced by corticosterone secretion. Brain Res 623:341–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey WL, Harris LS (1975) The tail flick test. Methods in narcotic research. Dekker, New York, pp 101–109

  • Emmerson PJ, Clark MJ, Mansour A, Akil H, Woods JH, Medzihradsky F (1996) Characterization of opioid agonist efficacy in a C6 glioma cell line expressing the mu opioid receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278:1121–1127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erb SM, Parker LA (1994) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:581–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gellert VF, Holtzman SG (1978) Development and maintenance of morphine tolerance and dependence in the rat by scheduled access to morphine drinking solutions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 205:536–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:191–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman ML, Basbaum AI, Fields HL (1982) Afferent and efferent connections of the rat tail flick reflex (a model used to analyze pain control mechanisms). J Comp Neurol 206:9–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman SG (1974) Behavioral effects of separate and combined administration of naloxone and d-amphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 189:51–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman SG (1979) Suppression of appetitive behavior in the rat by naloxone: lack of effect of prior morphine dependence. Life Sci 24:219–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991a) Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38:467–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991b) Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse 9:121–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks MS, Colvin AC, Juncos JL, Justice JB Jr (1992a) Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis. Brain Res 587:306–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks MS, Jones GH, Liem BJ, Justice JB Jr (1992b) Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43:815–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshaw BA, Lewis MJ (2001) Behavioral sensitization to ethanol in rats: evidence from the Sprague-Dawley strain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:685–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jodogne C, Marinelli M, Le Moal M, Piazza PV (1994) Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657:236–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinichev M, Easterling KW, Holtzman SG (2000) Periodic postpartum separation from the offspring results in long- lasting changes in anxiety-related behaviors and sensitivity to morphine in Long–Evans mother rats. Psychopharmacology 152:431–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinichev M, White DA, Holtzman SG (2004) Individualdifferences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity toopioid drugs in the rat I. Morphine-induced locomotor sensitization andtolerance. Psychopharmacology (in press)

  • Klebaur JE, Bardo MT (1999) Individual differences in novelty seeking on the playground maze predict amphetamine conditioned place preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63:131–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosten TA, Miserendino MJ (1998) Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60:785–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine AS, Billington CJ (1989) Opioids. Are they regulators of feeding? Ann NY Acad Sci 575:209–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke KW, Brown DR, Holtzman SG (1982) Effects of opiate antagonists and putative mu- and kappa-agonists on milk intake in rat and squirrel monkey. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:1275–1279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantsch JR, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Kreek MJ (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self- administration by rats under extended-access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 157:31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morley JE, Levine AS, Yim GK, Lowy MT (1983) Opioid modulation of appetite. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:281–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan JP, Holtzman SG (1975) Quantification of the analgesic activity of narcotic antagonists by a modified hot-plate procedure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 192:497–505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paolone G, Burdino R, Badiani A (2003) Dissociation in the modulatory effects of environmental novelty on the locomotor, analgesic, and eating response to acute and repeated morphine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 166:146–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paronis CA, Holtzman SG (1991) Increased analgesic potency of mu agonists after continuous naloxone infusion in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 259:582–589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511–1513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza PV, Rouge-Pont F, Deminiere JM, Kharoubi M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1991) Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 567:169–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza PV, Deroche V, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Corticosterone in the range of stress-induced levels possesses reinforcing properties: implications for sensation-seeking behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:11738–11742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinet PM, Rowlett J, Bardo MT (1998) Individual differences innovelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetaminein rats. Behav Process 44:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouge-Pont F, Piazza PV, Kharouby M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Higher and longer stress-induced increase in dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens of animals predisposed to amphetamine self-administration. A microdialysis study. Brain Res 602:169–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selley DE, Liu Q, Childers SR (1998) Signal transduction correlates of mu opioid agonist intrinsic efficacy: receptor-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding in mMOR-CHO cells and rat thalamus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:496–505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Gray JD (2001) Age-related differences in sensitivity to the antinociceptive effects of opioids in male rats. Influence of nociceptive intensity and intrinsic efficacy at the mu receptor. Psychopharmacology 156:445–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vitale MA, Chen D, Kanarek RB (2003) Chronic access to a sucrose solution enhances the development of conditioned place preferences for fentanyl and amphetamine in male Long–Evans rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 74:529–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Way EL, Loh HH, Shen FH (1969) Simultaneous quantitative assessment of morphine tolerance and physical dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 167:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Willner P (1984) The validity of animal models of depression. Psychopharmacology 83:1–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yaksh TL (1981) Spinal opiate analgesia: characteristics and principles of action. Pain 11:293–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by NIH grant DA11384 and Senior Scientist Award K05 DA00008 to S.G.H.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Rollins Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Road, NE, Suite 5074, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

    David A. White & Stephen G. Holtzman

  2. Behavioral Neurobiology, Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorders Research, Psychiatry CEDD, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Third Ave., Harlow, CM19 5AW, UK

    Mikhail Kalinichev

Authors
  1. David A. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikhail Kalinichev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen G. Holtzman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. White.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, D.A., Kalinichev, M. & Holtzman, S.G. Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. II. Agonist-induced antinociception and antagonist-induced suppression of fluid consumption. Psychopharmacology 177, 68–78 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1921-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1921-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation