Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of “Bacillus cellulasensis” strain NIO-1130T as a member of Bacillus altitudinis and emendation of the latter

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the study by Mawlankar et al. in Arch Microbiol 198:83–89 (2016), the phylogenetic position of strain “Bacillus cellulasensis” NIO-1130T based on 16S rRNA and gyrB genes was inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this study is to re-determine its taxonomic status using diverse genotypic approaches including single gene analysis, multilocus sequence analysis, and genomic analyses. The reconstructed phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene and six concatenated genes showed that “B. cellulasensis” NIO-1130T (=NCIM 5461T = CCTCC AB 2011126T) revealed the closest genetic relationship with type strain Bacillus altitudinis 41KF2bT, with 98.6–100 % similarities of 16S rRNA gene, gyrB, pycA, pyrE, mutL, aroE, trpB, and six concatenated housekeeping genes. The high similarities for gene(s) sequences between “B. cellulasensis” NIO-1130T and B. altitudinis 41KF2bT indicated that they should be conspecific. The DNA G+C content for strain NIO-1130T was determined to be 41.3 mol% and identical to that of B. altitudinis 41KF2bT. Moreover, 88.4 % of digital DNA–DNA hybridization and 98.7 % of average nucleotide identity values between two strains were much higher than the standard criteria for delineation of bacterial species, suggesting that they belonged to the same species. Therefore, the data from the combined genotypic analyses suggest that “Bacillus cellulasensis” should be classified as a member of Bacillus altitudinis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

MLSA:

Multilocus sequence analysis

dDDH:

Digital DNA–DNA hybridization

ANI:

Average nucleotide identity

References

  • Altschul SF et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM (2007) DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim OS et al (2012) Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon SW et al (2007) Bacillus niabensis sp. nov., isolated from cotton-waste composts for mushroom cultivation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1909–1913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lai QL, Liu Y, Shao ZZ (2014) Bacillus xiamenensis sp nov., isolated from intestinal tract contents of a flathead mullet (Mugil cephalus). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105:99–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y et al (2013) Phylogenetic diversity of the Bacillus pumilus group and the marine ecotype revealed by multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS One 8:e80097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Lai Q, Du J, Shao Z (2015) Bacillus zhangzhouensis sp. nov. and Bacillus australimaris sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1193–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawlankar R, Thorat MN, Krishnamurthi S, Dastager SG (2016) Bacillus cellulasensis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Arch Microbiol 198:83–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrshad M et al (2013) Bacillus halosaccharovorans sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium from a hypersaline lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:2776–2781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 14:60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter M, Rossello-Mora R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Satomi M, La Duc MT, Venkateswaran K (2006) Bacillus safensis sp. nov., isolated from spacecraft and assembly-facility surfaces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1735–1740. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64189-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shivaji S et al (2006) Bacillus aerius sp. nov., Bacillus aerophilus sp. nov., Bacillus stratosphericus sp. nov. and Bacillus altitudinis sp. nov., isolated from cryogenic tubes used for collecting air samples from high altitudes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1465–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne L et al (1987) Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by National Infrastructure of Natural Resources for Science and Technology Program of China (No. NIMR-2016-9) and COMRA program (No. DY125-15-R-01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongze Shao.

Additional information

Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Lai, Q. & Shao, Z. Identification of “Bacillus cellulasensis” strain NIO-1130T as a member of Bacillus altitudinis and emendation of the latter. Arch Microbiol 198, 835–838 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1259-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1259-8

Keywords

Navigation