Abstract
In the study by Mawlankar et al. in Arch Microbiol 198:83–89 (2016), the phylogenetic position of strain “Bacillus cellulasensis” NIO-1130T based on 16S rRNA and gyrB genes was inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this study is to re-determine its taxonomic status using diverse genotypic approaches including single gene analysis, multilocus sequence analysis, and genomic analyses. The reconstructed phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene and six concatenated genes showed that “B. cellulasensis” NIO-1130T (=NCIM 5461T = CCTCC AB 2011126T) revealed the closest genetic relationship with type strain Bacillus altitudinis 41KF2bT, with 98.6–100 % similarities of 16S rRNA gene, gyrB, pycA, pyrE, mutL, aroE, trpB, and six concatenated housekeeping genes. The high similarities for gene(s) sequences between “B. cellulasensis” NIO-1130T and B. altitudinis 41KF2bT indicated that they should be conspecific. The DNA G+C content for strain NIO-1130T was determined to be 41.3 mol% and identical to that of B. altitudinis 41KF2bT. Moreover, 88.4 % of digital DNA–DNA hybridization and 98.7 % of average nucleotide identity values between two strains were much higher than the standard criteria for delineation of bacterial species, suggesting that they belonged to the same species. Therefore, the data from the combined genotypic analyses suggest that “Bacillus cellulasensis” should be classified as a member of Bacillus altitudinis.
Abbreviations
- MLSA:
-
Multilocus sequence analysis
- dDDH:
-
Digital DNA–DNA hybridization
- ANI:
-
Average nucleotide identity
References
Altschul SF et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402
Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM (2007) DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91
Kim OS et al (2012) Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721
Kwon SW et al (2007) Bacillus niabensis sp. nov., isolated from cotton-waste composts for mushroom cultivation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1909–1913
Lai QL, Liu Y, Shao ZZ (2014) Bacillus xiamenensis sp nov., isolated from intestinal tract contents of a flathead mullet (Mugil cephalus). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105:99–107
Liu Y et al (2013) Phylogenetic diversity of the Bacillus pumilus group and the marine ecotype revealed by multilocus sequence analysis. PLoS One 8:e80097
Liu Y, Lai Q, Du J, Shao Z (2015) Bacillus zhangzhouensis sp. nov. and Bacillus australimaris sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:1193–1199
Mawlankar R, Thorat MN, Krishnamurthi S, Dastager SG (2016) Bacillus cellulasensis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Arch Microbiol 198:83–89
Mehrshad M et al (2013) Bacillus halosaccharovorans sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium from a hypersaline lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:2776–2781
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 14:60
Richter M, Rossello-Mora R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131
Satomi M, La Duc MT, Venkateswaran K (2006) Bacillus safensis sp. nov., isolated from spacecraft and assembly-facility surfaces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1735–1740. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64189-0
Shivaji S et al (2006) Bacillus aerius sp. nov., Bacillus aerophilus sp. nov., Bacillus stratosphericus sp. nov. and Bacillus altitudinis sp. nov., isolated from cryogenic tubes used for collecting air samples from high altitudes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1465–1473
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739
Wayne L et al (1987) Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by National Infrastructure of Natural Resources for Science and Technology Program of China (No. NIMR-2016-9) and COMRA program (No. DY125-15-R-01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Lai, Q. & Shao, Z. Identification of “Bacillus cellulasensis” strain NIO-1130T as a member of Bacillus altitudinis and emendation of the latter. Arch Microbiol 198, 835–838 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1259-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-016-1259-8