Abstract
Campylobacter jejuni, a Gram-negative rod bacterium, is the leading causative agent of human acute bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide. Consumption and handling of raw or undercooked poultry are regarded as a major source for human infection. Because bacterial chemotaxis guides microorganisms to colonization and invasion in the host cells, proteins involved in chemotactic processes can be novel targets for vaccine development. In this communication, we report amplification, cloning and expression of the C. jejuni chemotactic proteins in an Escherichia coli expression system. A total of 15 chemotactic protein genes were successfully expressed. These recombinant proteins were confirmed by nucleotide sequencing, SDS-PAGE analysis and immunoblot analysis of six-His and hemagglutinin tags. Twelve recombinant chemotactic proteins were further tested whether they were antigenic using sera from broiler chickens older than 4 weeks. The immunoblot results show that each chicken serum reacted to a variety of the recombinant proteins, but all sera reacted to the Cjj0473 gene product (annotated as a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein), suggesting that anti-Campylobacter antibodies may be prevalent in the poultry population. These antibody screening results provide a rationale for further evaluation of the Cjj0473 protein as a potential vaccine for broilers to improve human food safety.
Introduction
Campylobacter jejuni, a Gram-negative flagellated, curve-rod bacterium, is an etiological agent of human campylobacteriosis worldwide (Janssen et al. 2008; Kubota et al. 2011; Zilbauer et al. 2008; Lawes et al. 2012). The clinical symptoms range from mild watery diarrhea, nausea and abdominal pain to severe Guillain–Barré syndrome and reactive arthritis (Hughes and Cornblath 2005; Hannu et al. 2002; Humphrey et al. 2007; Moore et al. 2005). Human infection is often associated with consumption and handling of raw or undercooked poultry where this microorganism is a commensal in the chicken gastrointestinal microbiota (Hermans et al. 2012; European Food Safety Authority 2010). Therefore, strategies for reducing abundance and prevalence of Campylobacter in poultry flocks to prevent contamination of human food supplies have been intensively investigated (Lin 2009; Hermans et al. 2011). Vaccination of broiler chickens with components of C. jejuni is an attractive approach. Because bacterial chemotaxis can guide bacteria to colonization sites and invasion in the host cells (Chang and Miller 2006; Hendrixson and DiRita 2004; Hartley-Tassell et al. 2010), proteins involved in chemotaxis can be targets for vaccine development.
Bacterial chemotaxis involves a cascade of signal transduction and needs a battery of proteins to carry out this process. The major components of this chemosensory system include chemoreceptors [also called methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs)], the CheA kinase, the CheY response regulator and the CheW coupling protein (Wuichet and Zhulin 2010; Lertsethtakarn et al. 2011). C. jejuni has 10 chemoreceptors of which seven are as integral membrane proteins and three are as soluble forms (Lertsethtakarn et al. 2011; Marchant et al. 2002). Among MCPs, the CetA and CetB chemosensory proteins work together to detect pyruvate and fumarate (Elliott and DiRita 2008; Hendrixson et al. 2001). In addition, Hartley-Tassell et al. (2010) identified the Tlp1 chemoreceptor (Cj1506c) for aspartate. Tlp1 is universally conserved among isolates regardless of the isolation source (Day et al. 2012). The Cj0019c/DocB and Cj0262c chemosensory proteins play roles in C. jejuni colonization of chicken ceca (Hendrixson and DiRita 2004).
The canonical CheA kinase is a dimer, and each subunit has five separate functional domains (P1–P5) (Bilwes et al. 1999; Mourey et al. 2001; McEvoy et al. 1996; Wuichet et al. 2007). However, C. jejuni does not have the P2 domain and has an additional REC domain at the carboxyl terminus (Lertsethtakarn et al. 2011; Marchant et al. 2002). After the CheA kinase phosphorylates the CheY response regulator, the activated CheY interacts with the FliM and FliN proteins and subsequently regulates the flagellar motor rotation (Wadhams and Armitage 2004; Alex and Simon 1994; Hess et al. 1988). The coupling protein CheW is a cytoplasmic protein with two β-sheet domains (Griswold and Dahlquist 2002; Vu et al. 2012). This protein interacts with both the chemoreceptor and the CheA P5 domain that the kinase activity of the latter is modulated (Boukhvalova et al. 2002; Vu et al. 2012).
In this report, the chemotactic genes of C. jejuni D1–39 were amplified, cloned, and their gene products expressed in E. coli. These recombinant proteins were also assayed as to whether they were antigenic using broiler chicken sera.
Materials and methods
Bacteria, growth conditions and genomic DNA isolation
Campylobacter jejuni D1–39, isolated from chicken feces in Georgia, USA, was propagated in Mueller–Hinton agar plates at 42 °C for 48 h in a microaerobic condition (5 % O2, 10 % CO2 and 85 % N2) as described previously (Hiett et al. 2008). Competent HI-Control™ 10G and BL21 (DE3) cells (Lucigen Corp., Middleton, WI) for propagation of plasmid DNA and expression of recombinant proteins, respectively, were cultured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. C. jejuni genomic DNA was isolated using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit in a QIAcube automation system (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and yield of genomic DNA were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry, respectively. The genomic DNA in 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0) was stored at −80 °C.
PCR amplification and construction of C. jejuni chemotactic protein expression plasmids
Chemotactic gene sequences were downloaded from GenBank as references for designing oligonucleotide primers, which were complementary to both ends of each open reading frame, but without the start and stop codon sequences at 5′- and 3′-end, respectively. In order to facilitate the downstream cloning, purification and quality control, a six-His-tag sequence (5′-CATCATCACCACCATCAC-3′) at 5′-end and a hemagglutinin (HA) tag sequence (5′-TGCATAATCTGGAACATCATATGGATA-3′) at 3′-end were included in the forward and reverse primers, respectively. The oligonucleotide primers were synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich Co. (The Woodlands, TX) and are listed in Table 1. These genes were PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of the C. jejuni D1–39 isolate as previously described (Yeh et al. 2013). The amplified products were examined by electrophoresis in 2 % agarose gels. To construct expression vectors, the Expresso ® T7 Cloning and Expression System kit (Lucigen Corp.) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
DNA sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
To confirm that the chemotactic genes were inserted in the appropriate direction for expression, at least five colonies from each gene were randomly picked for DNA sequencing as previously described (Yeh et al. 2013). The pETite T7 Forward and pETite Reverse primers provided in the kit were used in the DNA sequencing reactions. Sequence chromatograms were edited for quality and trimmed to remove vector sequences using Phred (Ewing and Green 1998; Ewing et al. 1998) and Lucy (Li and Chou 2004). Phylogenetic analysis of the chemotactic genes was carried out using the maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstructions with MEGA version 5.10 (Tamura et al. 2011) based on the results of amino acid sequences aligned with MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) with default parameters. Sequences for comparison were retrieved by sequence similarity searches using BLASTp against the GenBank database (Schäffer et al. 2001).
Expression of C. jejuni chemotactic proteins in HI-control™ BL21 (DE3) cells
The plasmids harboring desired inserts were purified from HI-control™ 10G cells and transformed into competent HI-control™ BL21 (DE3) cells (Lucigen Corp.). In the preliminary screening, at least four colonies were randomly selected to evaluate whether they were able to produce recombinant chemotactic proteins in small scales in the presence of 1 mM of isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). After 4–5 h induction, 100 μl of the cultures were solubilized in an equal volume of 2× Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), and proteins were separated in 10–20 % SDS-PAGE gels (see below). After identification of the positive clones, the corresponding E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells were stored in LB-kanamycin (30 μg/ml) broth supplemented with 20 % glycerol at −80 °C.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblot
Protein samples were solubilized in 2× Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and denatured for 5 min at 95 °C. Electrophoresis was carried out on 10–20 % SDS–Tris–HCl-polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories) (Hames 1990). After separation, proteins in the gels were stained with Bio-Safe Coomassie G-250 Stain™ (Bio-Rad Laboratories) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by washing with double distilled water.
For immunoblot, proteins in the SDS-PAGE gels were electrotransferred into Immobilon membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories) (Gershoni 1988). The membranes were incubated with appropriate primary antibodies, followed by appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and TMB peroxidase substrate (KLP, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). The six-His tag that was fused to the recombinant chemotactic proteins in the membranes was detected using a Nickel His Detection kit (KPL, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were documented and processed by an AlphaImager HP System (ProteinSimple™, Santa Clara, CA) and its associated software.
Antibodies
Sera from broiler chickens were withdrawn from the wing vein. Blood was clotted by incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, followed at 4 °C overnight. Sera were collected by low-speed centrifugation, aliquoted and stored at −80 °C. BacTrace anti-Campylobacter species antibody, which was purified pooled sera from goat immunized with heat-killed whole cells of various Campylobacter strains and recognizes 22 Campylobacter strains, was purchased from KPL. Goat anti-chicken IgG antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was purchased from KPL, Inc.
The experimental uses of broiler chickens were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens, GA (IACUC no. PMSRU-08-2013-A).
Nucleotide sequences
Nucleotide sequences of the chemotactic genes have been submitted to the GenBank database and assigned the accession numbers KC692481–KC692494.
Results and discussion
After searching the genome sequence of C. jejuni subsp. jejuni 81-176 (GenBank accession no.: CP000538), 22 genes potentially involved in the chemotactic system were identified, including many MCPs. Except for the Cjj0180 gene, 21 chemotactic protein genes were successfully PCR amplified and ligated into the expression vector pETite. The sequences of the gene inserts and pETite vector junctions of the recombinant plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing in both directions. The results show that (1) all nucleotide sequences were in-frame and (2) all expression frames contained start and stop codons at the 5′- and 3′-end junctions, respectively. Further, based on the BLASTing against the GenBank database, both the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the chemotactic protein genes from our D1–39 isolate were highly homologous to those of other C. jejuni deposited in GenBank.
The recombinant pETite plasmids containing the chemotactic protein genes were purified and transformed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells, followed by induction with 1 mM of IPTG. A total of 15 C. jejuni chemotactic protein genes were successfully over-expressed in E. coli after IPTG induction, and each recombinant protein had its relative mobility of relevant sizes and positions in the SDS-PAGE. Here depicted in Fig. 1, we showed six (cheA, cheB, cheR, cheV, cheW and Cjj1549-MCP) chemotactic protein genes over-expressed after addition of IPTG (even numbers in Fig. 1) as examples. Other nine genes (cjj0473, cjj0706, cjj1128, cjj1498, ctsD, ctsE, ctsG, ctsP and ctsX) could also be induced by IPTG to generate recombinant proteins that had their respective relative mobility of relative sizes and positions in SDS-PAGE (data not shown).
Six genes (cjj0046, cjj0289, cjj0842, cjj0975, cjj1205 and ctsF) were not expressed after IPTG induction. Two possible explanations for this discrepancy are: (1) these recombinant proteins may be toxic to the E. coli host cells, and/or (2) the codon use of these genes may differ significantly from that used by E. coli (codon usage bias). In the latter case, it is well known that codon usage affects heterologous protein production in other expression systems (e.g., Kane 1995; Fath et al. 2011; Burgess-Brown et al. 2008; and references therein). Our six non-expressed nucleotide sequences were subjected to further analysis by the Rare Codon Analysis Tool (www.genscript.com/cgi-bin/tools/rare_codon_analysis). We found that the codon usage in these sequences may play a role in their expression in E. coli from our preliminary analyses (Supplemental Table 1). In the former case, these phenomena have been observed in many proteins expressed in an E. coli expression system (e.g., Yeh and Klesius 2011; Bannantine et al. 2008b).
Because a six-His tag and an HA tag were included in recombinant genes during the expression vector construction, the recombinant proteins were further confirmed by immunoblot analysis. The IPTG-induced lysates were electrophoresized in SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to PVDF membranes. The HA tag was probed by mouse anti-HA monoclonal antibody, followed by incubation with goat anti-mouse antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase and development with TMB substrate, while the six-His tag was detected with a Nickel HisDetection kit. As illustrated in Fig. 2a, except for the CtsE protein, each recombinant protein showed one major dense band that corresponds to its respective expected protein size on the blot that was detected by the nickel-horseradish peroxidase conjugate. These recombinant proteins were also detected by anti-HA antibody (Fig. 2b), implying that these proteins are fusion proteins with six-His and HA tags. Together with nucleotide sequencing, SDS-PAGE analysis and immunoblot analysis, we conclude these recombinant proteins are very likely the C. jejuni chemotactic proteins. The CtsE protein (Fig. 2, lane 10) was barely detected by the nickel substrate, but strongly reacted to the anti-HA antibody. The reason of this discrepancy is not known, but may be due to the inaccessibility of the His-tag region in the CtsE protein for nickel binding after the protein transfer in the Towbin buffer. The purpose of double tagging the recombinant proteins is for future construction of an array of proteins that are able to be used as a tool for antibody detection. In our case, the six-His tag at the amino terminus binds the nickel coated glass surface, while the HA tag at the carboxyl terminus faces outside and can be used for quality control of the protein array on glass surface.
Previously, we demonstrated that sera from broiler chickens contained anti-FliD (flagellar capping protein) antibody (Yeh et al. 2014). We wanted to determine whether broiler chicken sera contained antibodies that reacted to these recombinant proteins. Twelve recombinant proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to PVDF membranes. Immunoblot analysis was carried out with sera from 19 broilers older than 4 weeks of age. The results of reactivity of chicken sera to the recombinant chemotactic proteins are summarized in Table 2. Each serum reacted to various numbers of proteins. All broiler chicken sera did not react to the recombinant CtsE and CtsG proteins, but all sera reacted to the Cjj0473 (annotated as MCP). This result implies that the Cjj0473 may be one of the important common immunoreactive C. jejuni proteins among broiler chickens. Because the Campylobacter status of those broilers was not determined, we are not sure whether this anti-Cjj0473 antibody was protective or not at this point. The reasons for each serum reaction to various numbers of recombinant proteins may be due to different immunogenicity of the C. jejuni proteins, differences in immune responses among broiler chickens or both. These phenomena have also been reported in other systems (e.g., Bannantine et al. 2008a; Nielsen et al. 2012).
This Cjj0473 MCP from the D1–39 isolate had 365 amino acids with the calculated molecular mass of 40.5 kDa. It is well known that the Campylobacter proteins undergo posttranslational glycosylation (Logan 2006; Guerry et al. 2006; Ewing et al. 2009; Howard et al. 2009). The deduced MCP amino acid sequence of C. jejuni D1–39 was subjected to analysis by the NetNGlyc 1.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/) to predict whether it had the potential N-glycosylation site. This protein had six potential N-glycosylation sites at Asn6, Asn19, Asn65, Asn110, Asn116, and Asn346. Because C. jejuni also undergoes O-lined glycosylation (Thibault et al. 2001), the amino acid sequence of Cjj0473 was analyzed by the NetOGlyc 4.0 program (www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetOGlyc/) (Steentoft et al. 2013). The result reveals that the Cjj0473 protein had three potential O-glycosylation sites Thr125, Ser291, and Thr322. Either glycosylation may contribute to antigen specificity. Whether this protein has N- or O-lined glycosylation needs further investigation. The phylogenetic analysis shows that this MCP from our D1–39 isolate fell in the well-segregated clade of C. jejuni (Fig. 3).
The broiler sera reacted to these recombinant chemotactic proteins indicate that the anti-Campylobacter antibodies may be prevalent in commercial broiler flocks. Because the broilers used in this study were older than 4 weeks, the involvement of maternal antibodies, which diminish within 2 weeks of age (Sahin et al. 2003; Wyszyńska et al. 2004), was ruled out in the reaction to these proteins. This also suggests that broiler chickens acquire this microorganism from the environment during their maturation, and these chemotactic proteins were expressed and recognized by host immune cells during the microorganism’s colonization and adhesion in the chicken ceca.
However, because our comparison of the C. jejuni Cjj0473 amino acid sequence with the counterpart from E. coli shows that they share 33 % identity each other, the possibility that broiler antibodies to this Cjj0473 and other recombinant proteins may have been elicited by other microorganisms cannot be ruled out.
Sahin et al. (2003) and Shoaf-Sweeney et al. (2008) used whole cell lysate of C. jejuni to identify a battery of proteins that reacted to chicken maternal antibodies. However, none of the chemotactic proteins were detected in their studies. The reason is not known, but it is possible that the amounts of these proteins are very low, which were not able to be detected, or these proteins are not expressed in standard in vitro cultures (Handfield et al. 2000; Hang et al. 2003; Harris et al. 2006; Rollins et al. 2008; Lowry et al. 2010; Alam et al. 2013).
In conclusion, 21 chemotactic protein genes were amplified, ligated in the expression vector pETite, and transformed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. A total of 15 recombinant genes were successfully induced by IPTG to express. The recombinant proteins were confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis, six-His tag and HA tag detection on Western blot analysis. Sera from broiler chickens older than 4 weeks were used to test the antigenicity of these recombinant proteins. The results show that each broiler serum reacted to various numbers of recombinant chemotactic proteins, but all sera reacted to the Cjj0473 protein, suggesting this protein has potential as a novel target for vaccine development.
References
Alam MM, Tsai LL, Rollins SM, Sheikh A, Khanam F, Bufano MK, Yu Y, Wu-Freeman Y, Kalsy A, Sultana T, Sayeed MA, Jahan N, LaRocque RC, Harris JB, Leung DT, Brooks WA, Calderwood SB, Charles RC, Qadri F, Ryan ET (2013) Identification of in vivo-induced bacterial proteins during human infection with Salmonella enterica serotype Paratyphi A. Clin Vaccine Immunol 20:712–719
Alex LA, Simon MI (1994) Protein histidine kinases and signal transduction in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Trends Genet 10:133–138
Bannantine JP, Bayles DO, Waters WR, Palmer MV, Stabel JR, Paustian ML (2008a) Early antibody response against Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis antigens in subclinical cattle. Proteome Sci 6:5
Bannantine JP, Waters WR, Stabel JR, Palmer MV, Li L, Kapur V, Paustian ML (2008b) Development and use of a partial Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis protein array. Proteomics 8:463–474
Bilwes AM, Alex LA, Crane BR, Simon MI (1999) Structure of CheA, a signal-transducing histidine kinase. Cell 96:131–141
Boukhvalova MS, Dahlquist FW, Stewart RC (2002) CheW binding interactions with CheA and Tar. Importance for chemotaxis signaling in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 277:22251–22259
Burgess-Brown NA, Sharma S, Sobott F, Loenarz C, Oppermann U, Gileadi O (2008) Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: a multi-gene study. Protein Expr Purif 59:94–102
Chang C, Miller JF (2006) Campylobacter jejuni colonization of mice with limited enteric flora. Infect Immun 74:5261–5271
Day CJ, Hartley-Tassell LE, Shewell LK, King RM, Tram G, Day SK, Semchenko EA, Korolik V (2012) Variation of chemosensory receptor content of Campylobacter jejuni strains and modulation of receptor gene expression under different in vivo and in vitro growth conditions. BMC Microbiol 12:128
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797
Elliott KT, Dirita VJ (2008) Characterization of CetA and CetB, a bipartite energy taxis system in Campylobacter jejuni. Mol Microbiol 69:1091–1103
European Food Safety Authority (2010) The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. EFSA J 8:1496
Ewing B, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 8:186–194
Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998) Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8:175–185
Ewing CP, Andreishcheva E, Guerry P (2009) Functional characterization of flagellin glycosylation in Campylobacter jejuni 81–176. J Bacteriol 191:7086–7093
Fath S, Bauer AP, Liss M, Spriestersbach A, Maertens B, Hahn P, Ludwig C, Schäfer F, Graf M, Wagner R (2011) Multiparameter RNA and codon optimization: a standardized tool to assess and enhance autologous mammalian gene expression. PLoS One 6:e17596
Gershoni JM (1988) Protein blotting: a manual. Methods Biochem Anal 33:1–58
Griswold IJ, Dahlquist FW (2002) The dynamic behavior of CheW from Thermotoga maritima in solution, as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance: implications for potential protein–protein interaction sites. Biophys Chem 101–102:359–373
Guerry P, Ewing CP, Schirm M, Lorenzo M, Kelly J, Pattarini D, Majam G, Thibault P, Logan S (2006) Changes in flagellin glycosylation affect Campylobacter autoagglutination and virulence. Mol Microbiol 60:299–311
Hames BD (1990) One-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In: Hames BD, Rickwood D (eds) Gel electrophoresis of proteins: a practical approach, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–147
Handfield M, Brady LJ, Progulske-Fox A, Hillman JD (2000) IVIAT: a novel method to identify microbial genes expressed specifically during human infections. Trends Microbiol 8:336–339
Hang L, John M, Asaduzzaman M, Bridges EA, Vanderspurt C, Kirn TJ, Taylor RK, Hillman JD, Progulske-Fox A, Handfield M, Ryan ET, Calderwood SB (2003) Use of in vivo-induced antigen technology (IVIAT) to identify genes uniquely expressed during human infection with Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8508–8513
Hannu T, Mattila L, Rautelin H, Pelkonen P, Lahdenne P, Siitonen A, Leirisalo-Repo M (2002) Campylobacter-triggered reactive arthritis: a population-based study. Rheumatology 41:312–318
Harris JB, Baresch-Bernal A, Rollins SM, Alam A, LaRocque RC, Bikowski M, Peppercorn AF, Handfield M, Hillman JD, Qadri F, Calderwood SB, Hohmann E, Breiman RF, Brooks WA, Ryan ET (2006) Identification of in vivo-induced bacterial protein antigens during human infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Infect Immun 74:5161–5168
Hartley-Tassell LE, Shewell LK, Day CJ, Wilson JC, Sandhu R, Ketley JM, Korolik V (2010) Identification and characterization of the aspartate chemosensory receptor of Campylobacter jejuni. Mol Microbiol 75:710–730
Hendrixson DR, DiRita VJ (2004) Identification of Campylobacter jejuni genes involved in commensal colonization of the chick gastrointestinal tract. Mol Microbiol 52:471–484
Hendrixson DR, Akerley BJ, DiRita VJ (2001) Transposon mutagenesis of Campylobacter jejuni identifies a bipartite energy taxis system required for motility. Mol Microbiol 40:214–224
Hermans D, Van Deun K, Martel A, Van Immerseel F, Messens W, Heyndrickx M, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F (2011) Colonization factors of Campylobacter jejuni in the chicken gut. Vet Res 42:82
Hermans D, Pasmans F, Messens W, Martel A, Van Immerseel F, Rasschaert G, Heyndrickx M, Van Deun K, Haesebrouck F (2012) Poultry as a host for the zoonotic pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 12:89–98
Hess JF, Bourret RB, Simon MI (1988) Histidine phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 336:139–143
Hiett KL, Stintzi A, Andacht TM, Kuntz RL, Seal BS (2008) Genomic differences between Campylobacter jejuni isolates identify surface membrane and flagellar function gene products potentially important for colonizing the chicken intestine. Funct Integr Genomics 8:407–420
Howard SL, Jagannathan A, Soo EC, Hui JP, Aubry AJ, Ahmed I, Karlyshev A, Kelly JF, Jones MA, Stevens MP, Logan SM, Wren BW (2009) Campylobacter jejuni glycosylation island important in cell charge, legionaminic acid biosynthesis, and colonization of chickens. Infect Immun 77:2544–2556
Hughes RA, Cornblath DR (2005) Guillain–Barré syndrome. Lancet 366:1653–1666
Humphrey T, O’Brien S, Madsen M (2007) Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: a food production perspective. Int J Food Microbiol 117:237–257
Janssen R, Krogfelt KA, Cawthraw SA, van Pelt W, Wagenaar JA, Owen RJ (2008) Host–pathogen interactions in Campylobacter infections: the host perspective. Clin Microbiol Rev 21:505–518
Kane JF (1995) Effects of rare codon clusters on high-level expression of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol 6:494–500
Kubota K, Kasuga F, Iwasaki E, Inagaki S, Sakurai Y, Komatsu M, Toyofuku H, Angulo FJ, Scallan E, Morikawa K (2011) Estimating the burden of acute gastroenteritis and foodborne illness caused by Campylobacter, Salmonella, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus by using population-based telephone survey data, Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, 2005 to 2006. J Food Prot 74:1592–1598
Lawes JR, Vidal A, Clifton-Hadley FA, Sayers R, Rodgers J, Snow L, Evans SJ, Powell LF (2012) Investigation of prevalence and risk factors for Campylobacter in broiler flocks at slaughter: results from a UK survey. Epidemiol Infect 140:1725–1737
Lertsethtakarn P, Ottemann KM, Hendrixson DR (2011) Motility and chemotaxis in Campylobacter and Helicobacter. Annu Rev Microbiol 65:389–410
Li S, Chou H-H (2004) LUCY (2): an interactive DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal tool. Bioinformatics 20:2865–2866
Lin J (2009) Novel approaches for Campylobacter control in poultry. Foodborne Pathog Dis 6:755–765
Logan SM (2006) Flagellar glycosylation—a new component of the motility repertoire? Microbiology 152:1249–1262
Lowry JE, Goodridge L, Vernati G, Fluegel AM, Edwards WH, Andrews GP (2010) Identification of Brucella abortus genes in elk (Cervus elaphus) using in vivo-induced antigen technology (IVIAT) reveals novel markers of infection. Vet Microbiol 142:367–372
Marchant J, Wren B, Ketley J (2002) Exploiting genome sequence: predictions for mechanisms of Campylobacter chemotaxis. Trends Microbiol 10:155–159
McEvoy MM, Muhandiram DR, Kay LE, Dahlquist FW (1996) Structure and dynamics of a CheY-binding domain of the chemotaxis kinase CheA determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry 35:5633–5640
Moore JE, Corcoran D, Dooley JS, Fanning S, Lucey B, Matsuda M, McDowell DA, Mégraud F, Millar BC, O’Mahony R, O’Riordan L, O’Rourke M, Rao JR, Rooney PJ, Sails A, Whyte P (2005) Campylobacter. Vet Res 36:351–382
Mourey L, Da Re S, Pédelacq JD, Tolstykh T, Faurie C, Guillet V, Stock JB, Samama JP (2001) Crystal structure of the CheA histidine phosphotransfer domain that mediates response regulator phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis. J Biol Chem 276:31074–31082
Nielsen LN, Luijkx TA, Vegge CS, Johnsen CK, Nuijten P, Wren BW, Ingmer H, Krogfelt KA (2012) Identification of immunogenic and virulence-associated Campylobacter jejuni proteins. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:113–119
Rollins SM, Peppercorn A, Young JS, Drysdale M, Baresch A, Bikowski MV, Ashford DA, Quinn CP, Handfield M, Hillman JD, Lyons CR, Koehler TM, Calderwood SB, Ryan ET (2008) Application of in vivo induced antigen technology (IVIAT) to Bacillus anthracis. PLoS One 3:e1824
Sahin O, Luo N, Huang S, Zhang Q (2003) Effect of Campylobacter-specific maternal antibodies on Campylobacter jejuni colonization in young chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5372–5379
Schäffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, Shavirin S, Spouge JL, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Altschul SF (2001) Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2994–3005
Shoaf-Sweeney KD, Larson CL, Tang X, Konkel ME (2008) Identification of Campylobacter jejuni proteins recognized by maternal antibodies of chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6867–6875
Steentoft C, Vakhrushev SY, Joshi HJ, Kong Y, Vester-Christensen MB, Schjoldager KT, Lavrsen K, Dabelsteen S, Pedersen NB, Marcos-Silva L, Gupta R, Bennett EP, Mandel U, Brunak S, Wandall HH, Levery SB, Clausen H (2013) Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through SimpleCell technology. EMBO J 32:1478–1488
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739
Thibault P, Logan SM, Kelly JF, Brisson JR, Ewing CP, Trust TJ, Guerry P (2001) Identification of the carbohydrate moieties and glycosylation motifs in Campylobacter jejuni flagellin. J Biol Chem 276:34862–34870
Vu A, Wang X, Zhou H, Dahlquist FW (2012) The receptor–CheW binding interface in bacterial chemotaxis. J Mol Biol 415:759–767
Wadhams GH, Armitage JP (2004) Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:1024–1037
Wuichet K, Zhulin IB (2010) Origins and diversification of a complex signal transduction system in prokaryotes. Sci Signal 3:ra50
Wuichet K, Alexander RP, Zhulin IB (2007) Comparative genomic and protein sequence analyses of a complex system controlling bacterial chemotaxis. Methods Enzymol 422:1–31
Wyszyńska A, Raczko A, Lis M, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK (2004) Oral immunization of chickens with avirulent Salmonella vaccine strain carrying C. jejuni 72Dz/92 cjaA gene elicits specific humoral immune response associated with protection against challenge with wild-type Campylobacter. Vaccine 22:1379–1389
Yeh H, Klesius PH (2011) Over-expression, purification and immune responses to Aeromonas hydrophila AL09-73 flagellar proteins. Fish Shellfish Immunol 31:1278–1283
Yeh H, Hiett KL, Line JE, Oakley BB, Seal BS (2013) Construction, expression, purification and antigenicity of recombinant Campylobacter jejuni flagellar proteins. Microbiol Res 168:192–198
Yeh H, Hiett KL, Line JE, Seal BS (2014) Characterization and antigenicity of recombinant Campylobacter jejuni flagellar capping protein FliD. J Med Microbiol. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.060095-0
Zilbauer M, Dorrell N, Wren BW, Bajaj-Elliott M (2008) Campylobacter jejuni-mediated disease pathogenesis: an update. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 102:123–129
Acknowledgments
We thank Susan Q. Brooks of Poultry Microbiological Safety Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens, GA for the excellent technical support. We also thank Dr. Brian E. Scheffler and his Bioinformatics Group at the USDA ARS Genomics and Bioinformatics Research Unit in Stoneville, MS for sequencing and bioinformatics. This study was supported by the USDA Agricultural Research Service CRIS Project No. 6612-32000-060-00 and the U.S. Poultry and Egg Association Project No. 679. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yeh, HY., Hiett, K.L., Line, J.E. et al. Characterization and reactivity of broiler chicken sera to selected recombinant Campylobacter jejuni chemotactic proteins. Arch Microbiol 196, 375–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-0969-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-014-0969-z