Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales?
- Elinor OstromAffiliated withWorkshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana UniversityCenter for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University Email author
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The literature on global climate change has largely ignored the small but positive steps that many public and private actors are taking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A global policy is frequently posited as the only strategy needed. It is important to balance the major attention on global solutions as the only strategy for coping with climate change. Positive actions are underway at multiple, smaller scales to start the process of climate change mitigation. Researchers need to understand the strength of polycentric systems where enterprises at multiple levels may complement each other. Building a global regime is a necessity, but encouraging the emergence of a polycentric system starts the process of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and acts as a spur to international regimes to do their part.
KeywordsGlobal public goods Climate policy Collective-action theory
JEL ClassificationH4 Q2
- Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales?
Volume 49, Issue 2 , pp 353-369
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Global public goods
- Climate policy
- Collective-action theory
- Industry Sectors
- Elinor Ostrom (1) (2)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47408, USA
- 2. Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA