Skip to main content
Log in

Competitive screening in insurance markets with endogenous wealth heterogeneity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine equilibria in competitive insurance markets with adverse selection when wealth differences arise endogenously from unobservable savings or labor supply decisions. The endogeneity of wealth implies that high-risk individuals may ceteris paribus exhibit the lower marginal willingness to pay for insurance than low risks, a phenomenon that we refer to as irregular-crossing preferences. In our model, both risk and patience (or productivity) are privately observable. In contrast to the models in the existing literature, where wealth heterogeneity is exogenously assumed, equilibria in our model no longer exhibit a monotone relation between risk and coverage. Individuals who purchase larger coverage are no longer higher risks, a phenomenon frequently observed in empirical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong M., Rochet J.-C.: Multidimensional screening: a user’s guide. Eur Econ Rev 43, 959–979 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin A., Gottardi P.: Efficient competitive equilibria with adverse selection. J Polit Econ 114, 485–516 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway R., Leite-Monteiro M., Marchand M., Pestieau P.: Social insurance and redistribution with moral hazard and adverse selection. Scand J Econ 108, 279–298 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.R.: Private pensions, mortality risk, and the decision to annuitize. J Public Econ 82, 29–62 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.R., Finkelstein A.N.: The private market for long-term care insurance in the united states: a review of the evidence. J Risk Insur 76, 5–29 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon J., Hendel I.: Asymmetric information in health insurance: evidence from the national medical expenditure survey. RAND J Econ 32, 408–427 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawley J., Philipson T.: An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance. Am Econ Rev 89, 827–846 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chassagnon, A., Chiappori, P.: Insurance under Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection: The Case of Pure Competition. Discussion Paper, DELTA, Paris (1997)

  • Chetty, R., Saez, E.: Optimal Taxation and Social Insurance with Endogenous Private Insurance. NBER Working Paper No. 14403 (2008)

  • Chiappori P., Jullien B., Salanié B., Salanié F.: Asymmetric information in insurance: general testable implications. RAND J Econ 37, 783–798 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori P., Salanié B.: Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets. J Polit Econ 108, 56–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker K., Snow A.: The efficiency of competitive equilibria in insurance markets with asymmetric information. J Public Econ 26, 207–219 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meza D., Webb D.: Advantageous selection in insurance markets. RAND J Econ 32, 249–262 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey P., Geanakoplos J.: Competitive pooling: Rothschild–Stiglitz reconsidered. Q J Econ 117, 1529–1570 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engen, E.M., Gruber, J.: Unemployment insurance and precautionary saving. NBER Working Paper 5252 (1995)

  • Fang H., Keane M.P., Silverman D.: Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the medigap insurance market. J Polit Econ 116, 303–350 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A., McGarry, K.: Private information and its effect on market equilibrium: new evidence from long-term care insurance. NBER Working Paper 9957 (2003)

  • Finkelstein A., McGarry K.: Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev 96, 938–958 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D.: Equilibria and pareto optima of markets with adverse selection. Econ Theory 7, 207–235 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig M.: Some recent developments in the theory of competition in markets with adverse selection. Eur Econ Rev 31, 319–325 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemenway D.: Propitious selection. Q J Econ 105, 1063–1069 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemenway D.: Propitious selection in insurance markets. J Risk Uncertain 5, 247–251 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jullien B., Salanié B., Salanié F.: Screening risk-averse agents under moral hazard: single-crossing and the cara case. Econ Theory 30, 151–169 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T., Sappington D.: Countervailing incentives in agency problems. J Econ Theory 49, 294–313 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netzer N., Scheuer F.: Taxation, insurance and precautionary labor. J Public Econ 91, 1519–1531 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, N., Scheuer, F.: Competitive markets without commitment. SOI Discussion Paper No. 0814 (2009)

  • Rochet J.-C., Chone P.: Ironing, sweeping and multidimensional screening. Econometrica 66, 783–826 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M., Stiglitz J.: Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay in the economics of incomplete information. Q J Econ 90, 629–649 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart M.: Competitive insurance markets with two unobservables. Int Econ Rev 41, 153–169 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J.: The welfare implications of moral hazard and adverse selection in competitive insurance markets. Econ Inq 32, 193–208 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topkis D.: Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve B.: Concurrence et antisélection multidimensionelle en assurance. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 69, 119–142 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wambach A.: Introducing heterogeneity in the Rothschild–Stiglitz model. Journal of Risk and Insurance 67, 579–592 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C.: A model of insurance markets with incomplete information. J Econ Theory 12, 167–207 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Scheuer.

Additional information

We are grateful to Daron Acemoglu, Abhijit Banerjee, Felix Bierbrauer, Friedrich Breyer, Wolfgang Buchholz, Peter Diamond, Glenn Ellison, Oliver Fabel, Amy Finkelstein, Jon Gruber, Mathias Kifmann, Jim Poterba, Casey Rothschild, Harris Schlesinger, Arthur Snow, two anonymous referees and seminar participants at the Universities of Augsburg, Konstanz, MIT, Zurich and the 2007 Annual Meetings of the Risk Theory Society, the American Risk and Insurance Association, and the European Economic Association for valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Netzer, N., Scheuer, F. Competitive screening in insurance markets with endogenous wealth heterogeneity. Econ Theory 44, 187–211 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0481-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0481-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation