Abstract
We show that equilibria of a class of participation games (Palfrey and Rosenthal in Public Choice 41(1):7–53, 1983; Journal of Public Economics 24(2):171–193, 1984) exhibit minimal heterogeneity of behavior so that players’ mixed strategies are summarized by at most two probabilities. We then establish that, except for a finite set of common costs of participation, these games are regular. Thus, equilibria of these voting games are robust to general payoff perturbations and survive in nearby games of incomplete information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich J.: Rational choice and turnout. Am J Pol Sci 37(1), 246–279 (1993)
Borgers T.: Costly voting. Am Econ Rev 94(1), 57–66 (2004)
Campbell C.M.: Large electorates and decisive minorities. J Pol Econ 107(6), 1199–1217 (1999)
Coate S., Conlin M.: A group utilitarian approach to voter turnout: theory and evidence. Am Econ Rev 94(5), 1476 (2005)
DeSinopoli F., Iannantuoni G.: On the generic strategic stability of Nash equilibria if voting is costly. Econ Theory 25(2), 477–486 (2005)
Feddersen T.: Rational choice theory and the paradox of voting. J Econ Perspect 18(1), 99–112 (2004)
Feddersen T., Sandroni A.: A theory of participation in elections. Am Econ Rev 96(4), 1271–1282 (2006)
Ghosal, S., Lockwood, B.: Costly voting and inefficient participation. Working paper, University of Warwick (2004)
Goeree J.K., Grosser J.: Welfare reducing polls. Econ Theory 31(1), 51–68 (2007)
Govindan S., Reny P.J., Robson A.J.: A short proof of Harsanyi’s purification theorem. Games Econ Behav 45(2), 369–374 (2003)
Harsanyi J.C.: Games with randomly distributed payoffs: a new rational for mixed strategy equilibrium points. Int J Game Theory 2, 1–23 (1973a)
Harsanyi J.C.: Oddness of the number of equilibrium points: a new proof. Int J Game Theory 2, 235–250 (1973b)
Harsanyi J.C.: Rule-utilitarianism, rights, obligations and the theory of rational behavior. Theory Decis 12, 115–133 (1980)
Herrera H., Martinelli C.: Group formation and voter participation. Theor Econ 1(4), 461–487 (2006)
Kalandrakis T.: On participation games with complete information. Int J Game Theory 35(3), 337–352 (2007)
Keilson J., Gerber H.: Some results for discrete unimodality. J Am Stat Assoc 66(334), 386–389 (1971)
Krasa, S., Polborn, M.: Is mandatory voting better than voluntary voting? Working paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (2006)
Ledyard J.O.: The pure theory of large 2-candidate elections. Public Choice 44, 7–41 (1984)
Levine D., Palfrey T.: The paradox of voter participation: a laboratory study. Am Pol Sci Rev 101(1), 143–158 (2007)
Myerson R.: Population uncertainty and Poisson games. Int J Game Theory 27, 375–392 (1998)
Osborne M.J., Rosenthal J.S., Turner M.A.: Meetings with costly participation. Am Econ Rev 90, 927–943 (2000)
Palfrey T., Rosenthal H.: A strategic calculus of voting. Public Choice 41(1), 7–53 (1983)
Palfrey T., Rosenthal H.: Participation and the provision of public goods: a strategic analysis. J Public Econ 24(2), 171–193 (1984)
Palfrey T., Rosenthal H.: Voter participation and strategic uncertainty. Am Pol Sci Rev 79(1), 62–78 (1985)
Roemer, J.: Kantian allocations. Cowles Foundation Discussion paper No. 1582 (2006)
Taylor, C.R., Yildirim, H.: An analysis of rational voting with private values and cost uncertainty. Working paper, Duke University (2006a)
Taylor, C.R., Yildirim, H.: Public information and electoral bias. Working paper, Duke University (2006b)
van Damme E.: Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria. Springer, Berlin (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Thanks to participants of the 2006 MPSA conference for comments on an early version.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalandrakis, T. Robust rational turnout. Econ Theory 41, 317–343 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0396-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0396-y