Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative efficacy of parathyroidectomy and active surveillance in patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Counseling for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and mild hypercalcemia without indications for surgical intervention requires accurate estimates of the potential benefits of parathyroidectomy. We aim to summarize the available evidence regarding the benefits of parathyroidectomy that patients with mild PHPT without indications for surgery experience compared to observation. We searched multiple databases from inception to August 2015. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies that evaluated changes in bone health, quality of life or neuropsychiatric symptoms, or in the risk of nephrolithiasis, cardiovascular events, or death between patients undergoing parathyroidectomy or active surveillance. Eight studies were eligible. Risk differences were not significant, in part due to lack of events (fractures, nephrolithiasis, cardiovascular events, or deaths). No significant differences were observed across measures of bone health, quality of life, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. A single RCT evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) changes at 5 years found a small statistically significant effect favoring parathyroidectomy. Patients with mild PHPT without indications for surgery experience a limited number of adverse consequences during short-term follow-up limiting our ability to estimate the benefit of surgery during this timeframe. This information is helpful as these patients consider surgery versus active surveillance. Long-term data is warranted to determine who benefits in the long run from surgical intervention and the extent to which this benefit affects outcomes that matter to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Griebeler ML, Kearns AE, Ryu E, Hathcock MA, Melton LJ 3rd, Wermers RA (2015) Secular trends in the incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism over five decades (1965-2010). Bone 73:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilezikian JP, Brandi ML, Eastell R, Silverberg SJ, Udelsman R, Marcocci C, Potts JT Jr (2014) Guidelines for the management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: summary statement from the Fourth International Workshop. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(10):3561–3569. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-1413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sankaran S, Gamble G, Bolland M, Reid IR, Grey A (2010) Skeletal effects of interventions in mild primary hyperparathyroidism: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(4):1653–1662. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Udelsman R, Akerstrom G, Biagini C, Duh QY, Miccoli P, Niederle B, Tonelli F (2014) The surgical management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(10):3595–3606. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverberg SJ, Bilezikian JP (1996) Evaluation and management of primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81(6):2036–2040. doi:10.1210/jcem.81.6.8964825

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maraka S, Kennel KA (2015) Bisphosphonates for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Bmj-Brit Med J 351. doi:Artn H3783 10.1136/Bmj.H3783

  7. Sackett WR, Barraclough B, Reeve TS, Delbridge LW (2002) Worldwide trends in the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in the era of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Arch Surg 137(9):1055–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wermers RA, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Grant CS, Melton LJ 3rd (2006) Incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism in Rochester, Minnesota, 1993-2001: an update on the changing epidemiology of the disease. J Bone Miner Res 21(1):171–177. doi:10.1359/JBMR.050910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen H, Wang TS, Yen TW, Doffek K, Krzywda E, Schaefer S, Sippel RS, Wilson SD (2010) Operative failures after parathyroidectomy for hyperparathyroidism: the influence of surgical volume. Ann Surg 252(4):691–695. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f698df

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruda JM, Hollenbeak CS, Stack BC Jr (2005) A systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism from 1995 to 2003. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(3):359–372. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sejean K, Calmus S, Durand-Zaleski I, Bonnichon P, Thomopoulos P, Cormier C, Legmann P, Richard B, Bertagna XY, Vidal-Trecan GM (2005) Surgery versus medical follow-up in patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a decision analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 153(6):915–927. doi:10.1530/eje.1.02029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Udelsman R, Lin Z, Donovan P (2011) The superiority of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy based on 1650 consecutive patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg 253(3):585–591. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208fed9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wermers RACBL (2015) Epidemiology of primary hyperparathyroidism. In: The parathyroids, vol 3 edition. Academic Press, pp 291-308

  14. Singh Ospina NM, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Maraka S, Espinosa de Ycaza AE, Jasim S, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Gionfriddo MR, Al Nofal A, Brito JP, Erwin P, Richards M, Wermers R, Montori VM (2016) Outcomes of parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3514-1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269, W264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guyatt GMV, Devereaux PJ, Schunemann H, Bhandari M (2004) Patients at the center: in our practice, and ir our use of language. ACP J Club 140(1):A11–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells G SB, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2013) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses

  19. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McGough JJ, Faraone SV (2009) Estimating the size of treatment effects: moving beyond p values. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 6(10):21–29

    Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Copenhagen RmRCPV (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014)

  23. Bollerslev J, Jansson S, Mollerup CL, Nordenstrom J, Lundgren E, Torring O, Varhaug JE, Baranowski M, Aanderud S, Franco C, Freyschuss B, Isaksen GA, Ueland T, Rosen T (2007) Medical observation, compared with parathyroidectomy, for asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective, randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(5):1687–1692. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grey AB, Stapleton JP, Evans MC, Reid IR (1996) Accelerated bone loss in post-menopausal women with mild primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol 44(6):697–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao DS, Phillips ER, Divine GW, Talpos GB (2004) Randomized controlled clinical trial of surgery versus no surgery in patients with mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(11):5415–5422. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rao DS, Wallace EA, Antonelli RF, Talpos GB, Ansari MR, Jacobsen G, Divine GW, Parfitt AM (2003) Forearm bone density in primary hyperparathyroidism: long-term follow-up with and without parathyroidectomy. Clin Endocrinol 58(3):348–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lundstam K, Heck A, Mollerup C, Godang K, Baranowski M, Pernow Y, Varhaug JE, Hessman O, Rosen T, Nordenstrom J, Jansson S, Hellstrom M, Bollerslev J (2015) Effects of parathyroidectomy versus observation on the development of vertebral fractures in mild primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100(4):1359–1367. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-3441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Edwards ME, Rotramel A, Beyer T, Gaffud MJ, Djuricin G, Loviscek K, Solorzano CC, Prinz RA (2006) Improvement in the health-related quality-of-life symptoms of hyperparathyroidism is durable on long-term follow-up. Surgery 140(4):655–663. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.016, discussion 653-654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Okamoto T, Kamo T, Obara T (2002) Outcome study of psychological distress and nonspecific symptoms in patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism. Arch Surg 137(7):779–783, discussion 784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perrier ND, Balachandran D, Wefel JS, Jimenez C, Busaidy N, Morris GS, Dong W, Jackson E, Weaver S, Gantela S, Evans DB, Grubbs EG, Lee JE (2009) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of parathyroidectomy versus observation in patients with “asymptomatic” primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 146(6):1116–1122. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tremollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Drewniak N, Laparra J, Ribot CA, Dargent-Molina P (2010) Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX Tool. J Bone Miner Res 25(5):1002–1009. doi:10.1002/jbmr.12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mihai R, Sadler GP (2008) Pasieka’s parathyroid symptoms scores correlate with SF-36 scores in patients undergoing surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg 32(5):807–814. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9509-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Webb SM, Puig-Domingo M, Villabona C, Munoz-Torres M, Farrerons J, Badia X (2013) Development of a new tool for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11:97. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 306(6890):1440–1444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 306(6890):1437–1440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 27(1):191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ (2015) Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 68(6):617–626. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mullan RJ, Flynn DN, Carlberg B, Tleyjeh IM, Kamath CC, LaBella ML, Erwin PJ, Guyatt GH, Montori VM (2009) Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor. J Clin Epidemiol 62(2):138–142. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Silverberg SJ, Shane E, Jacobs TP, Siris E, Bilezikian JP (1999) A 10-year prospective study of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery. N Engl J Med 341(17):1249–1255. doi:10.1056/Nejm199910213411701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Abdelhadi M, Nordenstrom J (1998) Bone mineral recovery after parathyroidectomy in patients with primary and renal hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83(11):3845–3851. doi:10.1210/jcem.83.11.5249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Almqvist EG, Becker C, Bondeson AG, Bondeson L, Svensson J (2004) Early parathyroidectomy increases bone mineral density in patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective and randomized study. Surgery 136(6):1281–1288. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nakaoka D, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi T, Yamaguchi T, Kobayashi A, Chihara K (2000) Prediction of bone mass change after parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(5):1901–1907. doi:10.1210/jcem.85.5.6604

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Silverberg SJ, Shane E, Jacobs TP, Siris E, Bilezikian JP (1999) A 10-year prospective study of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery. N Engl J Med 341(17):1249–1255. doi:10.1056/NEJM199910213411701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yeh MW, Zhou H, Adams AL, Ituarte PH, Li N, Liu IA, Haigh PI (2016) The relationship of parathyroidectomy and bisphosphonates with fracture risk in primary hyperparathyroidism: an observational study. Ann Intern Med. doi:10.7326/M15-1232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu N, Donnan PT, Leese GP (2011) A record linkage study of outcomes in patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism: the Parathyroid Epidemiology and Audit Research Study (PEARS). Clin Endocrinol 75(2):169–176. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2010.03958.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ambrogini E, Cetani F, Cianferotti L, Vignali E, Banti C, Viccica G, Oppo A, Miccoli P, Berti P, Bilezikian JP, Pinchera A, Marcocci C (2007) Surgery or surveillance for mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(8):3114–3121. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Okamoto T, Gerstein HC, Obara T (1997) Psychiatric symptoms, bone density and non-specific symptoms in patients with mild hypercalcemia due to primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic overview of the literature. Endocr J 44(3):367–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hoffmann TC, Montori VM, Del Mar C (2014) The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. JAMA 312(13):1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Gionfriddo MR, Ospina NS, Maraka S, Tamhane S, Montori VM, Brito JP (2016) Shared decision making in endocrinology: present and future directions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00468-4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the authors who responded to our request for further information: Drs. Okamoto T, Bollerslev J, Rao S, Grey A, and Nordentrom J.

This publication was made possible by CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Montori.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Naykky Singh Ospina, Spyridoula Maraka, Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Ana Espinosa De Ycaza, Sina Jasim, Michael Gionfriddo, Ana Castaneda-Guarderas, Juan P Brito, Alaa Al Nofal, Patricia Erwin, Robert Wermers, and Victor Montori declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Specific remarks

Patients with mild PHPT without indications for surgery experience a limited number of adverse consequences during short-term follow-up. This information is helpful as these patients consider surgery versus active surveillance. Long-term data is warranted to determine who benefits in the long run from surgical intervention.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Table 1

Risk of bias in the included randomized clinical trials on parathyroidectomy versus active surveillance in mild uncomplicated primary hyperparathyroidism (DOCX 12.1 kb)

Supplemental Table 2

Risk of bias of the included observational studies in mild uncomplicated primary hyperparathyroidism (DOCX 14.0 kb)

Appendix

(DOCX 29.1 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh Ospina, N., Maraka, S., Rodriguez-Gutierrez, R. et al. Comparative efficacy of parathyroidectomy and active surveillance in patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 27, 3395–3407 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3715-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3715-3

Keywords

Navigation