Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Many attempts have been made to improve the predictive ability of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) which integrates bone mass and area. The addition of an extra variable derived from the hip dual-energy X-ray (DXA) image TR_σ, which describes distribution of mass within the scanned area of the trochanter, improved prediction of 15-year hip fracture probability in elderly women.

Introduction

Two-dimensional DXA imaging of the proximal femur to produce an aBMD is a clinically useful predictor of future fracture risk. Further analysis of the DXA image to produce an eight-variable hip structure analysis (Beck HSA) has been developed to improve understanding of structural factors determining hip bone strength at each of three proximal femur sites, the narrow femoral neck (NN), intertrochanter (TR) and shaft (S). Recently, data on four measurements derived from the currently used eight Beck HSA variables were used to capture population variation in bone structure at each site. These include two previously used variables, the localised aBMD and the sub-periosteal width (W) applying to 5-mm sections (at each sites), and two new variables, standard deviation of normalised mineral-mass projection profile distribution (σ), and displacement between centre-of-mineral mass and geometric centre-of-mineral mass of projection profile (δ).

Methods

Using a cohort of 1159 women, mean baseline age 75, who sustained 139 hip fractures over 15 years, we determined whether these measures significantly improved 15-year hip fracture prediction compared to current approach utilising age and total hip aBMD. To describe the most parsimonious model for hip fracture risk prediction, the 12 base measures (4 from each site), total hip aBMD and age were evaluated in stepwise logistic regression models.

Results

The final model included TR_σ, total hip aBMD and age and provided improved utility for hip fracture prediction compared to total hip aBMD and age alone (C-statistic 0.73 vs. 0.69, P = 0.009 and net reclassification improvement 0.164, P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

Addition of TR_σ to total hip aBMD and age substantially improved prediction of 15-year hip fracture risk in this cohort of elderly women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, Cauley J, Black D, Vogt TM (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in white women: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med 332(12):767–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M, Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG (2009) Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res 24(1):153–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE, Scott WW Jr, Rao GU (1990) Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. Invest Radiol 25(1):6–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Poole KE, Mayhew PM, Rose CM, Brown JK, Bearcroft PJ, Loveridge N, Reeve J (2010) Changing structure of the femoral neck across the adult female lifespan. J Bone Miner Res 25(3):482–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khoo BC, Brown K, Zhu K, Price RI, Prince RL (2014) Effects of the assessment of 4 determinants of structural geometry on QCT- and DXA-derived hip structural analysis measurements in elderly women. J Clin Densitom 17(1):38–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. LaCroix AZ, Beck TJ, Cauley JA, Lewis CE, Bassford T, Jackson R, Wu G, Chen Z (2010) Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone density? Osteoporos Int 21(6):919–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaptoge S, Beck TJ, Reeve J, Stone KL, Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR (2008) Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 23(12):1892–1904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rivadeneira F, Zillikens MC, De Laet CE, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, Beck TJ, Pols HA (2007) Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 22(11):1781–1790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Szulc P, Duboeuf F, Schott AM, Dargent-Molina P, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD (2006) Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study. Osteoporos Int 17(2):231–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prince RL, Devine A, Dhaliwal SS, Dick IM (2006) Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women. Arch Intern Med 166(8):869–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khoo BC, Beck TJ, Qiao QH, Parakh P, Semanick L, Prince RL, Singer KP, Price RI (2005) In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-centre clinical trials. Bone 37(1):112–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaptoge S, Dalzell N, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Khaw KT, Reeve J (2003) Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65. Bone 32:561–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gnudi S, Ripamonti C, Lisi L, Fini M, Giardino R, Giavaresi G (2002) Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 13(1):69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Partanen J, Jämsä T, Jalovaara P (2001) Influence of the upper femur and pelvic geometry on the risk and type of hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16(8):1540–1546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pulkkinen P, Partanen J, Jalovaara P, Jämsä T (2004) Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(4):274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Crabtree N, Loveridge N, Parker M, Rushton N, Power J, Bell KL, Beck TJ, Reeve J (2001) Intracapsular hip fracture and the region-specific loss of cortical bone: analysis by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 16(7):1318–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Bonfield W, Burgoyne CJ, Reeve J (2005) Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet 366(9480):129–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox KM, Magaziner J, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE, Kashner TM (1999) Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 54(12):M635–M640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA 288(15):1889–1897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff at the Data Linkage Branch, Hospital Morbidity Data Collection and Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages for their work on providing the data for this study.

Conflicts of interest

Keenan Brown is a stockholder of Mindways Software Inc. Benjamin CC Khoo, Joshua R Lewis and Richard L Prince declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. C. C. Khoo.

Additional information

BCC Khoo and JR Lewis are joint first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoo, B.C.C., Lewis, J.R., Brown, K. et al. Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events. Osteoporos Int 27, 241–248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3282-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3282-z

Keywords

Navigation